Youtube video

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That 2003 PC probably does not receive firmware updates from the manufacturer, and hasn’t for over a decade.

    It might still function, but that doesn’t mean it is still supported. At this point, many operating systems won’t even install due to the x86-64bit requirements.

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of that matters. No company can say what your hardware can do. Apple’s policies are disgustingly anti-user.

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nothing else matters except privacy and security for me. Apple provides that in their phones.

        PCs from 2003 are full of vulnerabilities, use legacy instruction sets, lack power efficiency, lack manufacture support, do not support UEFI, have no IOMMU hardware isolation, have no modern VM capabilities, probably have no TPM, etc etc etc.

        If Apple is anti-user, then we need to also start blaming every single hardware manufacturer that doesnt support their products anymore. Manufacturers of phones, motherboards, TVs, SSDs, displays, mice, keyboards, printers, network equipment, etc etc etc.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok then those that can’t afford Apple can shop other brands. They just won’t get the Apple support, and will have to rely on community efforts to keep their machines running.

            What exactly do you want Apple to do here?