Dude just loves riling himself up into a frenzy, doesn’t he? I guess he was mad that Hasan was going to interview Obama, which never even happened, and now he thinks Hasan is a “genocide supporter” because a random YouTube clip he came across that said “Hasan supports Kamala’s policies”, which he never even watched and was most likely just clipped. Hasan isn’t perfect, but fuck, you think at least him going to the DNC as a journalist would be considered fair from BE. Wild.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      all I will say regarding this is that my brother started watching Hasan a year ago and he’s gone from a biden supporter to a kamala-despising communist, so if Hasan’s role is funnelling disaffected people back into liberalism, anecdotally, he’s very much failing at that shrug-outta-hecks

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        72
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This is the reason I am in general fine with whatever Hasan’s shenanigans are. Honestly my biggest reason that I do not hate his nepo-baby existence is because he is the anti-Vaush, whereas Vaush’s pipeline is anarchist to natoist, Hasan’s is clearly democrat to communist.

        It’s all still very fucking stupid and I wish the kids would get their politics elsewhere, from like actual lived experiences, but I will settle.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          3 months ago

          I just wish people could sit down and read, for their own sake. I’m guilty of doing very little reading myself (only read a couple modern theory books and 2 Marx and Lenin books lol) but the fact that everything complex has to get simplified into videos and clips just makes it incredibly hard to transmit a whole different worldview.

        • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s all still very fucking stupid and I wish the kids would get their politics elsewhere, from like actual lived experiences, but I will settle.

          Could you expand on this?

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            A better, and more helpful way for young leftists to ‘do politics’ when you are young is not through media consumption, but through actual participation in politics. In particular, a very interesting breeding ground for these experiences is school politics, where you will begin, if you can even run a successful campaign in the first place (which is a learning experience itself) how systems of power actually influence the world, like how a 'democratic institution" is actually completely at the whims of an undemocratic bureaucracy.

            For example, when I was a young rad-lib in high school, I was treasurer for two years in a row, with one of the major projects that happened in our first year being the development of a subsidized after-school study program for under-performing students that would actually pay kids to be there (we could only afford 5 dollars an hour a day, but it was better than nothing). This was because most of the kids I knew that were struggling in school also had other money problems this would require not doing expensive dances, but we felt that if we could get students even a little extra time, it could potentially get us more government money for the school in general. Surprisingly, most of the student government was on board with it. After running it through a bunch of different things, we eventually were able to vote on a version of the program that would run for only one month before standardized testing. Not great, but again, better than nothing.

            After the vote, we went to the administration to iron out the details with them, and they immediatly put the kai-bosh on it, killing the program in the womb and telling us we were interfering with academic programming and that it was illegal. To be fair, it might not be legal to pay kids to go to school, but we didn’t know that.

            The next year we were allowed to spend a bunch of money on a huge new American flag and huge dance venue on a military base, being strictly monitored throughout our voting process. You know, things that only benefit rich kids and subsidize costs that the administration themselves should be spending.

            It was one of the eye-openers for me and really started me down the path of radicalization, more so than any event that was mediated (the Iraq war etc.) in particular it taught me not to trust what I believed at the time were ‘so-called liberal administrators’. My full turn toward M-L theory and communism came after watching and participating in the Bernie campaign, but I likely would have never done that without those formative experiences in actual student politics.

            Meanwhile, almost every radical anarchist kid I knew in school (we didn’t have any commies at the time), that didn’t participate in student government because it was ‘lame and pointless’ (which, ya know, fair) has become some form of hyper-online right-wing libertarian or anarcho-natoist in their thirties. It’s one of those things where I feel like because they never actually are where the rubber hits the road, their politics are almost purely reactionary, as opposed to attempting to be forward thinking, program oriented and analytical. The real ones were big in Food Not Bombs, and aren’t as online.

        • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s all still very fucking stupid and I wish the kids would get their politics elsewhere, from like actual lived experiences

          this is the point users in here seem to miss

          but I will settle.

          I won’t

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Scolding the kids will only get you so far. They have to have time to grow up. That being said, I do not take the political convictions of teenagers very seriously, much like I don’t take the political convictions of academics very seriously, because neither are fully engaged with the life experience of the industrial proletariat.

              • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Parenti absolutely was an academic. And he’s a good one. A great one even. That said, it wouldn’t have shaken my personal political convictions of he had suddenly denounced the entirety of his work and endorsed the democrats, or suddenly decided the USSR was bad actually, and that anarchist Catalonia was the one true leftist movement. He’s just an observer, not a participant, in revolution.

                This is opposed to someone like Trotsky, who I take far more seriously, who for me has taken many years of exposure and reading to understand what elements of his criticism of the USSR are valid, and what parts are cuckoo-bananas ideological hallucinations given the period of time he lived in. And for Trotsky, his criticisms got more outlandish the less involved and responsible he was with the actual process of government. Another example, someone like Gorbachev should be taken seriously, but given his cowardice to publicly oppose Stalin’s popularity with the people of the USSR after his death, it is difficult to treat him as acting in good faith.

                I take revolutionaries and their histories and ideas very seriously. Half the reason I take Marx seriously is because Mao, Lenin, and Ho Chi Mihn take him seriously, and understanding revolutionary theory in the 20th century is impossible without understanding him.

            • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              this is why having a Twitch Streamer celebrity as a “pipeline” to being “leftist” is completely irrelevant and not a point in streamer’s favor. Oh so the kids online are consuming a different flavor of brainrot content? So what? It’s all a fake online game if this is your avenue of approach and I suspect people in this thread take umbrage with that analysis because they also approached from this angle and to some extent, it’s a fake online game to them too

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        all I will say regarding this is that my brother started watching Hasan a year ago and he’s gone from a biden supporter to a kamala-despising communist, so if Hasan’s role is funnelling disaffected people back into liberalism, anecdotally, he’s very much failing at that

        Hasan repeatedly shutting down anti-“tankie” rhetoric is the source of this.

        Everyone that either silently allows that shit or vocally supports it funnels people back into the dems.

        Everyone that does not allow that shit funnels people into further radicalisation.

        It’s that simple.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          BE does this with his insufferable ultra shit. If he did anything but sit in his gamer chair and spend half his time punching left I wouldn’t hate him as much.

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hasan has lib moments but he’s good on >90% of issues. He has a massive audience to which he spreads leftist ideas, like it’s honestly so lucky that one of the biggest streamers on twitch is pro-China and singlehandedly normalizing Xi chad memes on the platform. He also reaches a lot of non-political people thanks to being friends with people like Ludwig, Valkyrae or pokimane, introducing them and their audiences to expressly political figures like Felix Biedermann and Brace Belden.

    Good luck starting the revolution by hissing at everyone who doesn’t already agree with you.

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dialectical materialism is me wanting to shit on Hasan for being a sheepdog millionaire living in a mansion vs me wanting to shit on BadEmpanada for being a deranged sexpat gringo holed up in Argentina

  • gueybana [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Unless you’re just some dude in the Gobi desert who doesn’t even have internet, there is zero merit to being this absolutist

  • We need to stop purity testing and seeing if people are “good” and start seeing if people are useful instead. Hasan might be a bit cuddled up with libs(bad) and is a millionaire(owns a house) but he provides a useful service and pipeline for the left, making him useful. Norman Finkelstein is a transphobe(bad), but his analysis is invaluable and is tremendously useful to the left. I don’t care if a person is good or moral. I care if they help the left. BE occasionally produces valuable content and I applaud him for that, but this is nonsensical, idealist, individualist drivel from him.

    • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I dislike both of them but I fucking HATE bad empanada for acting like the most smartest leftest boy in the room all the time while being nothing more than a streamer just like Hasan. At least Hasan is honest about what he is.

      • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t watch either but I think this is the distinction that I see as well, with the addition that I only ever really hear about BE when he’s trying to start some clout-chasing fight with somebody else. I guess maybe that’s because Hasan doesn’t need to chase clout but it’s definitely the most lame thing about BE.

    • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hasan is generally extremely treat-brained, and he isn’t as harsh on liberalism or as supportive of AES as us. The difference in opinion is whether he serves the purpose of radicalizing liberals, or preventing further radicalization.

      I’m of the opinion that he generally works more for radicalization than against it.

    • fossphi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe it’s just an artefact of the inherent tribalism in any active movement. I haven’t really made up my mind fully on this, but it does seem more and more true that “in group” fighting over differences is more vitriolic than out group?

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        In-group fighting can seem more intense because mutual understanding is assumed, vs outgroup. Marxists can laugh at liberals but tend to take other Marxists seriously enough to get upset, as an example

      • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Its not in group out group fighting its indovidualism. Individuals thinking they know the way and need to attack others for not thinking that way, instead of being systematic about pushing everybody forward.

        • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          defending treatbrained streamers as your vanguard of systematic “pushing everybody forward” is actually an extremely capitalist-realist analysis. the way forwards is not twitch streamers, stop trying to make capitalist entertainment products into your friends and also the revolution.

          • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even Hasan would agree with this analysis lol.

            That being said, he did say in a recent stream that “you aren’t going to vote the revolution in” so I’d say he’s more then a “treatbrained streamer”.

          • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 months ago

            We live in capitalism. Whatever method we use, capitalism will be involved. If someone makes money on Twitch while helpfully radicalizing more people in the right direction, I see that as a good thing. It’s definitely worked in the opposite direction to make reactionaries, and there’s no reason to give up those methods.

            It’s like how electoralism won’t save us but by running and being crushed Bernie helped radicalized a lot of people. He definitely did more good doing that and introducing socialist ideas, making more future anarchists and socialists than basically every socialist I know of, than every every podcaster or reading circle I’ve seen since.

            • usa_suxxx [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              3 months ago

              If someone makes money on Twitch while helpfully radicalizing more people in the right direction, I see that as a good thing.

              I mean, the 2024 election year is very dead. You had at least Bernie Sanders sheep dogging people into the Democratic Party in 2016 and 2020. Now, there’s not even a need for a sheep dog. You’re a Trump supporter if you bring up anything. Like, I don’t really think a lot of people are radicalizing as stated. Something isn’t working as believed.

              • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s not great, especially materially, but narrative-wise things look better than when I was a kid in the 90’s: the USSR had fallen, and everyone agreed communism had failed. You couldn’t even say the word “socialist” let alone “communist” when I was younger, let alone anyone admit they were one. I think there’s just been a liberal backlash to these changes as they try to reconstitute control and power of the narrative, but there’s been progress.

                The main problem as I see it is just we’re not organizing fast enough for the problems capitalism are causing, like climate change, and also foreign policy is still dog shit among most progressives. Also, I worry that this revolutionary atmosphere happened in the 60’s too and was dismantled by the police state, so I’m hoping we learned some lessons from that time somehow.

                • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The main problem as I see it is just we’re not organizing fast enough for the problems capitalism are causing

                  Wonder if that has anything to do with kids sitting inside watching a guy be “radical” on their behalf and feeling like they’ve done something?

              • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Dude I don’t even watch Hasan. I’ve learned more about him here on hexbear than I have anywhere else lol. But the point is that I now see more kids complain about modern imperialism and talk about other concepts I would’ve never imagined could’ve pierced the liberal media bubble who mention him than at any other time in life (since maybe peak Chapo?). You’ve got to adapt to the times and environment we have, and start somewhere.

                Or you could let that whole audience get scooped up by Tim Pool, Destiny, Joe Rogan, Vaush, don’t know who else is popular on the streaming circuit but you get my point. Because, believe it or not, consumed media does make a HUGE difference. It’s half the reason this current fight is so damn hard right right now, because of manufactured consent in the media.

          • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 months ago

            Im not talking about streamers i mean on the left in general. Before there was twitter there were 400 groups writing position papers on each others position papers and getting nothing done

              • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yea good thing the first world had all those successful communist revolutions that definitely werent impacted by individualism to the highest degree. I dont give a fuck about any of these internet people so i dont know why ur so aggressive.

                • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m aggressive because it’s frustrating having to deal with 500 eternal waves of radlib children who repeat the same dumb lib shit over and over to defend what are essentially celebrities.

  • Edamamebean [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t even disagree with BE on much (this is one of the things) but I just had to stop watching him because it made me so miserable. I don’t think that man has ever had a positive thought, or if he ever has he certainly hasn’t ever made it apparent. Just constant rage and hostility. Not to say it’s unwarranted, ruthless criticism etc etc, but it does get incredibly exhausting and depressing to watch.

    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Watching Hasan usually makes me feel better about negative events. If I stick to my own thoughts and whatever media and shitposting I see, I spiral into depression but Hasan seems to always give a good perspective where you can stay mad but not let it ruin your entire mood. IDK maybe he is just sexy and calms me down

    • amphibian [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      his anger is absolutely for the right reasons but he cares way too much about the wrong things and its exhausting how every day theres a new lefty hes ruthlessly (and usually rightfully) upset at. hes a smart guy for sure but dude is like the greek god of negativity

    • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hasan is just following in the footsteps of AOC

      Deeply unserious lol

      Like someone on here comparing PSL to trots.

      • Barx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        PSL does have a Trot genealogy, though is ML. Socialist Workers Party -> Workers World Party -> PSL. SWP was Trot. WWP were an OG tankie split and the origin of Marcyism, literally led by Marcy. They adopted more ML stances but didn’t shed all Trotskyist thought. So many people handing out little papers and making unrealistic proclamations about what organized labor would do in the imperisl core. Then PSL split off of that over internal organizational disputes. PSL seems to have been on the right side of that and is obviously now even cooler and more ML, and explicitly so.

        But I do think see echoes of its Trotskyist parentage from time to time. For example, putting so much energy into electoral vanguardism, aping Bolshevik structures, and coming across as detached from the community when it comes to local work. To me, one of the more salient failures of Trots is in how they tend to aesthetically go through the motions of an idealized canon of What Trotsky Said To Do, which is often just what Lenin et al developed for their conditions, and generally fail to do the science of revolution. Much time spent self-congratulating, picking bad fights with others while repeating boilerplate lines, and then launching into the Next Big Thing that is Very Communist because leadership made A Great Speech. This does not describe PSL, but I do think you can see legacy bits of that kind of thinking pop up on occasion.

    • ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We won’t know what he was going to do with an interview with Obama now, unfortunately, but it would have been very telling.

      I have a degree of respect for journalists who curry favour to gain access in order to really press issues and do the actual job of (adversarial) journalism. There’s a fine line to walk if you want to do this because it’s extremely easy to get blacklisted, especially these days.

      I think one good example of being behind enemy lines like this for the sake of journalism is Abby Martin going to Israel to interview average Israelis on the streets to get them to indict themselves via vox pop. It would be uncharitable to denounce Martin for going to Israel and speaking with Israelis given what she went there for and what she achieved.

      Whether Hasan had intended a similar angle w/interviewing Obama or any other big figure in the Democratic Crime Syndicate idk but I think there’s an argument to be made that simply rubbing shoulders with them does not necessarily mean that you are a Compradorpoints-esque figure.

      The other side of the argument is that he was allowing himself to be coopted and he was betraying his principles for cash and clout. This is where a conflict emerges between the more liberal-oriented model of the “objective” or politically-neutral journalist and the person who has an overtly political platform (but I don’t really buy into that paradigm personally) however what Hasan was doing was the inverse; rather than starting from the place of journalistic inquiry and becoming politically partisan, he started from the place of political partisanship and was intending to pursue a journalistic endeavour. I think this makes the issue so much more complex because we are going to view his actions as politics-first, even if he is attempting to do something journalism-first, but to stand on ground for your political beliefs only to rescind them to start pursuing journalistic endeavours does give a strong impression of reneging on your politics.

      For me I absolutely cannot be fucked trawling through hours of streams in the lead up and the aftermath to glean some insight into what he had planned to do because he just isn’t that important to me. So that leaves me feeling cautious about Hasan until I get some good info shedding light on this from a trustworthy source but I personally don’t think that this alone is sufficient for me to consider him persona non grata as it stands.

    • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hasan is just following in the footsteps of AOC where he spends some time critiquing Democratic policies but then spends every waking moment trying to get cozy with the Democratic party.

      AOC supports Kamala for president, Hasan does not. Before Kamala’s speech, Hasan said “I’ll wait and see” with respect to whether he supports Kamala, but now, he is very vocal about the fact that he does not support Kamala for president.

      Or maybe you meant Hasan is following in AOC’s footsteps in some other way?

        • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hasan can’t have it both ways where he’s an “outsider” that gets kicked out of the Convention for saying some stuff on stream that made the DNC or Donors angry, but then also had spent all that time trying to get into the Convention in the first place so he could stream from the Convention and attract as many Democratic party hogs who wanted to watch the convention via Twitch.

          What is wrong with advocating for Palestinian emancipation with other protestors outside the DNC, inside the DNC, and with the Uncommitted movement outside the DNC, and then getting kicked out for it?

          The statement is pretty vague, do you have a specific example of something Hasan did or said at or outside of the DNC that you take issue with?

          • don’t bother their analysis is purely vibes based and completely uninformed. theres a huge difference between AOC stanning for kid killer kamala and Hasan literally trying to infiltrate the DNC to provide a single pro-palestinian voice on the inside, and getting kicked out for interviewing the excluded protestors and uncommmitted movement. literally just watch a single stream or video of his, he is CONSTANTLY criticizing democrats, more often than republicans. its not just some kind of ‘’‘triangulation’‘’ thing, hasan is literally doing what a journalist is supposed to do in this situation, bringing the pro palestine anti genocide message to people who would otherwise not have heard it. idk what idiot footfaults got this opinion from because it sure as shit didn’t come from actually watching hasan.

              • Philosophosphorous [comrade/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                he explicitly says all the time that he is overly nice to people on camera even when he disagrees with them so that he can hopefully deprogram their followers. its like you don’t understand the concept of media or propaganda, or are being intentionally obtuse.

                • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  also, i think there’s a fundamental disconnect from Hasan and his fans who see the DNC libs as annoying and misinformed but fundamentally OK people.

                  I, and other hardline communists, see the US as a fourth reich and the DNC as little Nazi genocidal fucks. When I see someone who is supposed to be “on my side” cozying up with them and hugging them, I don’t think “wow so glad he is de-radicalizing those fascists” I think “what the fuck is this rich shithead doing? Is he a traitor to our cause like all the other people who schmooze up to the nazis have been historically”

            • Walk_On [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t take issue with him because he’s constantly attacking the dems, raising money for Palestine, was a guest on the Deprogram, and straight up said in a recent stream that “the revolution won’t be voted in”.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          3 months ago

          lmao bro he’s just a streamer. At least, unlike badempanada he doesn’t spend half his time being insufferable and punching left and hating on every still standing socialist government while being an expat living a cushy life in south America by pandering to self hating western anti-communists that want to also act like the smartest most ultra left children online.

          fuck them both but fuck BadEmpanada more for larping like the most principled leftist ever while basically just being a whiny little twerp on the internet all the time.

          • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            lmao bro he’s just a streamer.

            tell that to his defenders here, because half the comments are about how he is the vanguard of the revolution and doing heckin praxis

            You want your cake and eat it too. Is Hassan a serious political subject? Then he is open for criticism for being a radlib DNC bootlicker. Is he just a silly streamer? Then why are people here making these dumbass arguments about how he is working towards communism with twitch characteristics?

            • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              half the comments are about how he is the vanguard of the revolution

              what vanguard? there’s no vanguard in the anglosphere. Communism has no foothold in America. 0.000% of Communism has been built here dubois-depressed

              • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                tell that to the users in here talking about how much epic praxis he’s doing (including you, who say he’s a “pipeline”). If he’s a “pipeline” then where that pipeline is dumping people out to is open to criticism. I don’t see the point of moving people from one radlib camp to another, it’s just celebrity parasocial shit combined with all the identitarian flavors of ideology to feel special. It’s all radlib shit and it’s actually damaging to any forming left because you have a bunch of would-be leftists in here making zionist-adjacent arguments filled with credulity like “He was on the fence about Kamala”.

                Anybody who is “on the fence about Kamala” isn’t a Marxist or is lying. Anybody in here defending that shit is so attached to his dick they can’t think straight and are shrinking into a DNC progressive corncob

            • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t give a fuck about either of these people. It is you motherfuckers that have an unhealthy parasocial relationship with a dipshit settler streamer.

              • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                my “unhealthy relationship” is i want them to go away and for you people to shut the fuck up about them and stop posting drama about them here and stop embarrassing yourself making arguments on their behalf

                • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I want them both to go away. You defending the one is why you are so fucking cringe. I am not defending Hasan I literally never watch him, I am begging you people to stop defending the shit stirring clout chasing settler expat. Fuck off.

      • usa_suxxx [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Before Kamala’s speech, Hasan said “I’ll wait and see” with respect to whether he supports Kamala, but now, he is very vocal about the fact that he does not support Kamala for president.

        to be fair, wait and see is a deeply unserious position on Kamala. I think it is fair to say that is triangulation. There was plenty of information on Kamala’s stances.

      • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Before Kamala’s speech, Hasan said “I’ll wait and see” with respect to whether he supports Kamala

        Oh so he was on the fence about genocide and if she said enough nice words he would support the genocidal party? This is why people on this site hate Hassan and his defenders, it makes you say dumb ass shit like this. He cozies up to the DNC, and you cozy up to him, and by association you are now making quasi-pro-genocidal arguments. Like your parasocial attachment has made you 35% more zionist.

          • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            then he’s stupid, and he should know better, because she was never going to do that. What she might have done, if she wanted to appeal to youth voters, is give lip service to holding Israel accountable, like Obama and Reagan other presidents have done in the past. And if she did that he would be giving her kudos and promoting her.

            This level of incredulity and naivety is frustrating to deal with. You and I and Hassan should all know Democrats are never ever going to fucking stop supporting Israel. If Hassan doesn’t know that, he’s a stupid radlib. If he does, he’s a networking grifter. There’s no good world where someone smart and marxist holds out hope Kamala will become anti-imperialist randomly.

            • Barx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              I suppose it depends on whether he had any real expectation that she would be anything other than a supporter of Zionism to the hilt. If he thought she was anything else, he was foolish. But if he just wanted to set up his lib followers for radicalizing disappointment, that is not a bad strategy for a humble Twitch streamer lol. It’s the same basic steps that netted us a bunch of new commies when Bernie (a Zionist socdem!) was ratfucked.

              • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                But if he just wanted to set up his lib followers for radicalizing disappointment, that is not a bad strategy for a humble Twitch streamer lol.

                Why are you attributing this 5d chess to him? If Kamala had been tactical and instead offered lip service to ‘hold israel accountable’ or some shit he’s pitched a slowball to the DNC to hit it out of the park. They just didn’t even swing, because they don’t care about youth voters whatsoever. Hasan was trying to give the DNC the path out, telling them exactly how to sheepdog his viewers back in, and they scorned him - but if they had instead accepted his offer and given lipservice to the anti-zionists then they would have eaten it up

                • Barx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Why are you attributing this 5d chess to him?

                  I don’t think it’s 5D chess to go, “let the libs prove to my audience that they will do the bad things” instead of “I will tell my audience the libs will do bad things”. Do you think this is a complex strategy?

                  If you re-read my comment, you will also find that I offered two scenarios and did not attribute anything to him.

                  If Kamala had been tactical and instead offered lip service to ‘hold israel accountable’ or some shit he’s pitched a slowball to the DNC to hit it out of the park.

                  Either way he has pitched himself content to criticize. And there is no difference in that regardless of whether he would say “wait and see” vs. “they won’t oppose the genocide”.

                  They just didn’t even swing, because they don’t care about youth voters whatsoever. Hasan was trying to give the DNC the path out, telling them exactly how to sheepdog his viewers back in, and they scorned him - but if they had instead accepted his offer and given lipservice to the anti-zionists then they would have eaten it up

                  Their version of lip service is what they got. Feigned regret about death “on both sides” and then a clearly Zionist position. They said it was yime to end the “war”. It sounds like you’re imagining they bring out a Palestinian comprador to say “ceasefire” and condemn Hamas, but I don’t think that would have the result you imagine.

            • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              What she might have done, if she wanted to appeal to youth voters, is give lip service to holding Israel accountable, like Obama and Reagan other presidents have done in the past.

              Reagan and Obama held Israel on a tighter leash, which would not have been an unreasonable expectation at all of Kamala. Nobody expected her to put on a Hamas headband and invade Tel Aviv, but compared to the uniquely fanatical zionist Biden it would not have surprised me to see Kamala do the bare minimum and actually take action to stop Israel’s current onslaught.