[Bug] "This helps protect our community." · Issue #4734 · iv-org/invidious
github.com
Update 21/09/2024: #4734 (comment) EDIT by @unixfox: The Invidious team is aware of this issue. It appears that it affects all the software using YouTube. Please refrain from commenting if you have...

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22423685

EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io. Please don’t abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      17·
      3 months ago

      To answer the “why”, it’s because the word “content” is kinda meaningless. Instead of making films, documentaries, talk shows, reference guides, cartoons… it’s all just this generic “content” slop that’s just there to feed the machine

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.eeEnglish
            5·
            3 months ago

            I mean, you don’t call it whatever you like, but content is the technical definition of it.

          • arglebargle@lemm.eeEnglish
            4·
            3 months ago

            I agree with this a lot. I really do not like the term “content”. It is like going to a recipe for some “slop”, like using a term that is just a catch all for everything tossed on a plate.

            Art is great. Movies, music are also fine terms. And so is simply saying they made a video. Watering it all down to the term “content” is just so boring and mind numbing.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          3 months ago

          Not really. The term “content creator” is corporate speak. Google’s ad-based business model has a binary classification: content and ads. It’s not an inaccurate term, but using it implicitly endorses the corporation’s binary world view.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.eeEnglish
        11·
        3 months ago

        Showman/woman refers to a pretty specific type of performer, I.E someone who is on stage typically.

        Entertainer isn’t a label I’d necessarily apply to educational content, for example.

          • Tja@programming.devEnglish
            16·
            3 months ago

            Yes it’s much better to use

            “comedians/teachers/musicians/educators/entertianers/phonereviewers/sportscommenters/singers/journalists/programmers/documenters/analysts/lawyers/lockpickers/politicians/presenters/trolls”

            … than…

            “content creators”.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.eeEnglish
            8·
            3 months ago

            What do you have against creators as a label? I don’t really see these difference myself.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            4·
            3 months ago

            Or just call them Content creators, recognize they don’t really produce value for anyone but YT’s grab on the attention economy and start living in the real world.

      • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
        9·
        3 months ago

        Not all content is entertaining. Someone who makes tutorials I wouldn’t call an entertainer. That’s why “content creator” is used as a catch all term to cover all of it.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.eeEnglish
        3·
        3 months ago

        That’s pretty insulting, a lot of what YouTube creators do takes real skill, and it’s a full time job for many.

        • borgertwo@ani.socialEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          In the past maybe, but certainly not these days. It’s overglorified corporate money grab propaganda, that goes around shamelessy guilt tripping viewers when truth is spoken. Much of these so-called content creators do not much else than making face react videos to something they saw and just talk about their likes or dislikes. They get paid lots just to make a soy-jack face and shitty clickbaits. The amount of money some them get paid is large sums insane for little efforts in proportion to what worth it actually ought to be. There people out there putting real efforts and labor to contributions to society to keep it running that paid squat in comparison. Its sad really. Go ahead downvote me, it doesn’t change the truth i speak.