• lime!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168 hours ago

    the return dislike plugin is just stupid. it’s a community database now, so rather than being based on the actual number of dislikes on youtube it’s based on the dislikes of the people who have the plugin.

    it used to be that it actually got the real numbers but youtube removed that endpoint so now it’s just a misanthropic echo chamber.

    • @HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 hours ago

      It’s better than nothing. Also I’d probably weigh the opinion of people who have the extension higher than of those who don’t.

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 hours ago

        Is it? personally, when i think of “people who want to see the dislike bar” my mind equates that to “people who want to dislike”, and that’s not a group of people i want to interact with.

        • @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          73 hours ago

          To me it wrings more of "people who want to know before they waste 20 minutes whether this video is clickbait, just actually false, rightwing conspiracy theories, or has some massive editing flaw that makes the video pointless.

    • Lucy :3
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      It’s honestly relatively representative afaik

      Even though it, SponsorBlock etc. could just be neglected by using piped or just federated alternatives.

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        how can we even know that though? there’s no stats anymore.

        also, if peertube et al got bigger, surely sponsorblock would be useful there as well? if creators would use those services because people were on them, sponsors would contact those creators because they got the views.

        • Lucy :3
          link
          fedilink
          36 hours ago

          It subjectively feels right, and instances where creators leaked the numbers the RTYTD stats matched pretty closely.

          Until peertube grows to that size, it’s still a long time. Then it would be useful.

    • @Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 hours ago

      I love my pie hole and I love the functionality of being able to access a VPN and use on my home network stuff on the go it’s pretty good

  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4311 hours ago

    Consent-o-matic instead of cookies and adnausem instead of ublock origin.

    Consent-o-matic will actively opt out of popups.

    Adnausem is built on top of ublock origin and will silently “click” on the ads behind the scenes to mess up your advertising profile and cost the advertisers money.

  • Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 hours ago

    Not sure that its a must have and possibly uBO could handle it if I could be bothered to check but I like LocalCDN too.

    • @yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      128 hours ago

      Being a chromium based browser, they’re fixing to loose access to the same features that’s killing Ublock. So in the near future, the Brave CEO is still going to be a cunt, but your ad-blocking is going to be forever inferior.

    • @Spoilt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3510 hours ago

      Are you talking about the browser that added its own referral codes in cryptocurrency sites?

      (Yeah, maybe I’m a bit vindictive…)

      • @10_0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        410 hours ago

        People can hate, but the shield is more convenient than uBlock. I know because I had uBlock origin and noscript back I’m the day. Too bad I tend to separate the app from its creator because it’s beneficial for me.