• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s hard but not impossible, as even ‘retail displays’ run an OS in the background to control input switching, image settings etc.

      Honestly the best thing to do is buy whatever TV you want (we have a couple of the LG OLEDs in our household), and don’t ever plug them into your network (or WiFi). Otherwise, with updates OS and apps become sluggish, with more ads crammed in.

      Instead, use a seperate media player (e.g. Apple TV if you’re already on the iOS ecosystem, Nvidia Shield or similar for Android, HTPC if you’re so inclined etc.) - they’re more powerful, arguably more secure & private, and portable between displays if/when you upgrade.

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately EtherNet over HDMI exists so your your TV can still access the Internet if the Apple TV or Nvidia Shield has Internet access. To prevent that you have to make sure use older HDMI cable less then HDMI 1.4.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Then you turn around and return it. Don’t encourage that behavior by just letting it happen.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If your retailer has a generous enough policy to let you return an opened TV because simply because you don’t like it. I spent $1,200 on a Sony TV with backlight bleed issues that were so bad that half the screen was tinted blue. I tried to return it or get a replacement but was told by both the retailer and Sony support that half the screen being blue was “normal for LED TVs and within acceptable parameters” and to go fuck myself.

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s what chargebacks are for. You don’t have to rely on shitty retailers return policy.

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                You’re not going to win a chargeback determination in this case either.

                You will be, as I was, shit out of luck.

                • teft@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If your credit card doesn’t let you do a chargeback for defective equipment then you need to get a better card provider.

                  TVs not working after purchase would qualify as defective in my opinion.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              In my Country, you can Return within 1 month if you are not satisfied.

  • ftbd@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    FYI for those using DNS-based adblocking: I discovered that my AndroidTV box asks 8.8.8.8 when my local DNS server blocks a request.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      What a shower of twats. Don’t block the request in that case, just redirect it to your local server that returns a 1x1 transparent png for all requests.

      • sanguinet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wouldn’t mind doing it. I run my own DNS so it wouldn’t affect me, but I figure if they’re already trying 8.8.8.8 they may as well try 8.8.4.4 and perhaps more, so it’d require a bunch of firewall rules.

        Now, all of that is moot point cause I hate the whole “smart TV” thing, so they’d never be connected to the internet.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have an old 60 inch 1080p TV from the early days of smart tvs. It has a built in app for plex and youtube, a remote that works as a pointer, it’s insanely slow but it has zero ads and I’m never ever getting a newer model.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup. My 58" 4k LG TV has a bunch of apps (we only need Netflix and Jellyfin), and the only ads I’ve seen are in their apps, which don’t need to be opened. It’s a little slow and apparently can’t even handle Jellyfin over HTTPS, but it works well.

      My SO wants a bigger TV, and I’m dreading looking through the current market to find a decent replacement. I’d really like OLED and for it to be a few inches bigger, but it seems everything has ads and spyware out of the box. Screw that…

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t ever connect them to the internet. Period.

    If it’s required, buy a different tv. It’s not difficult to look that up beforehand.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I suspect in the near future it will be impossible to buy a TV without spyware/adware. The only option will be to not connect it to the internet and run your own Raspberry PI/SBC based solution.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

        The super budget/sold at a loss TVs will absolutely be gutted for spyware.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

          I have a feeling premium TVs won’t escape adware/spyware either. They can get their margin on the hardware and earn some more money on spyware; I don’t see what incentive they have to not do both. I hope I am wrong though.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re not wrong, there are a number of videos from Louis Rossman (right to repair advocate) on YouTube lambasting LG for doing this very thing on their high-end G-series OLED TVs; including defaulting to opt-in to marketing and providing PIR data after an automatic update.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Looks at the top of the line Samsung Odessey 49"/54" ultrawide monitor. Looks at specs. Reread this comment.

          Uhuh

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now all you need is a built-in camera to prove Orwell was right… only off by a few decades, really.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone know of a reasonably priced OLED/QLED, >60", 4k TV without smart features?

    I really don’t want the spyware and adware that come with newer smart TVs, and I’m willing to pay a bit of a premium for it. I’d also be happy with a unicorn smart TV that doesn’t have any of those anti-features.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      What about just not connecting it to the network? Then put a video device on it like Roku or Apple tv or whatever.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        just not connecting it to the network?

        Some TVs require connecting to the network to set it up, and I’m concerned TV manufacturers will get more brazen going forward. If there’s a company that doesn’t do this nonsense, I’d rather reward them for being good instead of working around misfeatures in popular brands.

        Roku

        Has ads that can be disabled, at least as-of last year. Not sure how long that’ll last…

        Apple TV

        Apple also seems interested in ads.

        Any other option will likely degrade to having ads at some point. I could probably get rid of them w/ a PiHole or something, but that could end up being a game of whack-a-mole.

        I’ll probably end up w/ a Raspberry Pi or something running Kodi or similar, which is really annoying because that’s yet another thing I have to self-host just to avoid this stupid obsession with ads.

        • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know this isn’t purely TV-related, but there used to be a secret menu for Roku where you could disable home screen ads. That stopped working for me several months ago. So I recently bought an Onn box (which is basically Android TV, but had as very cluttered UI) and side-loaded one of the open source launchers onto it. It’s been a much better experience than Roku, not least because there’s are no more home screen ads.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            there used to be a secret menu for Roku where you could disable home screen ads

            That’s the first link. If it no longer works, I guess Roku isn’t an option anymore. 😟

            • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I should clarify: the secret menu can still be navigated to and the options there set. But ads now appear regardless. I went back into the menu and verified the options hadn’t changed (they hadn’t). It’s like Roku has gotten wind of the exploit and ‘fixed’ their OS to ignore those options.

      • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yah, as much as I hear people looking for non-smary TVs for this reason, that’s the correct answer. Mine is connected for convenience, and I’d rather save every mb of space on my xbox, right now there’s occasionally the small ad tucked into the input selection menu, but if it starts showing me full screen ads I’ll deny it internet and install streaming services on Xbox.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I hooked mine up to wifi once to download an update to fix a bug. Then immediately removed the network settings.

          The performance on most of these TV apps is terrible anyway. And Samsung has been caught listening to mics before. Baffles me that people would leave these connected.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not good enough. Any OTA updates your TV can get over the web will eventually be trying to circumvent your IP blacklists to shove in any ad-riddled garbage they can.

      Literally just blacklist your TV’s MAC address, and use a dedicated set top box of some kind to avoid this shit. My current choice is my NVIDIA Shield Pro 2019, which I installed a 3rd party WOLF launcher (there’s also F-Launcher) and turned off auto-updates so I could avoid NVIDIA and Google doing the same.

      At some point, I will probably need to switch to a NUC or other HTPC with some flavor of Linux on it, as eventually the Shield may succumb to this shit as well.

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seeing this just makes me want a tv that is just a monitor, no crap you just plug in your own thing whatever you want.

    • Lexam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Done! Take any Smart TV, factory reset it. And never let it connect to the Internet again .

    • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Look into commercial monitors like the Samsung BET-H series. I bought a 43” one years ago, plugged an Apple TV into it, and haven’t really thought about the screen ever since.

      According to the specs it runs Tizen, but I haven’t had to look at a menu since I got the settings dialed in, i.e. years, so I completely forgot. Don’t even know where the OEM remote is, it works with the HDMI-CEC commands sent by the Apple TV.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    normal people can’t just… grab a single board PC and… install Linux on it! What are they supposed to do!?

    I dunno, suffer, I guess. Pass the keyboard. I’m feeling Friends.

    edit: my cousin and his wife came over about four months ago and saw we used a keyboard and the TV was just a computer and he went “why the fuck haven’t we just done that?”. He doesn’t know know Linux, but he has a Steam Deck and got by alright.

    Sometimes, they just need the idea, a little push.