Israel’s government approved on Sunday a proposal by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi that mandates any government-funded body refrain from communicating with Haaretz or placing advertisements in the paper. The proposal was approved by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The decision, according to the government’s explanation, is a reaction to “many articles that have hurt the legitimacy of the state of Israel and its right to self defense, and particularly the remarks made in London by Haaretz publisher, Amos Schocken, that support terrorism and call for imposing sanctions on the government.”

The proposal did not appear on the government’s agenda published ahead of the weekly cabinet meeting. The Attorney General’s office, unaware of the intention to bring the proposal to a vote, did not review it at all and did not present its opinion, as customary. The resolution was presented to ministers during the discussion without any legal opinion.

In a speech at the Haaretz conference in London last month, Schocken said “the Netanyahu government doesn’t care about imposing a cruel apartheid regime on the Palestinian population. It dismisses the costs of both sides for defending the settlements while fighting the Palestinian freedom fighters, that Israel calls terrorists.”

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hamas targets were military targets. More than 33% killed were active IDF soldiers.

    “Only two-thirds of the people killed were civilians!” is quite the defense. Impressive.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The US had a civilian casualty rate of 12/13 in Iraq.

      The IDF with 70% women and children killed would have a higher civilian casualty rate than Hamas even if literally every single man they killed was an active duty Hamas fighter.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        OK, and? You’re seriously trying to defend 66% civilian casualties because 70%+ is worse?

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I am. Killing civilians is bad, and I don’t care who does it. Only on Lemmy do we see galaxy-brains decrying Palestinian deaths while brushing off 66% civilian casualties on the Israeli side.