WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Tuesday he wants the U.S. to take ownership of the Gaza Strip and redevelop it after Palestinians are resettled elsewhere.
“We will own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site,” Trump said a start of a joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Yes, it was definitely the fault of the people protesting genocide and telling the democrats the things they’re doing are incredibly unpopular, stop trying to be republicans, and not the democrats who told us to fuck off.

      Really, if nobody protested, genocide would have been super popular and Kamala definitely would have won.

      Sure are lot of liberals feeling smug about the most marginalized people in society being harmed these days. Something about scratch a liberal?

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

        Protestors made a poor decision. Despite protesting for the right reasons the consequences will be more harmful to those they sought to stand up for.

        This was not an unforeseen consequence, everyone with a brain was screaming it from the rooftop, and now here we are.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

          Most of them never had good intentions, and hardly any of them gave a shit about the Palestinians at all. The rest were fools.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I really don’t think the protestors should be the ones worried about their immortal soul for their behavior regarding the genocide debate.

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Why not?

            If you think about this from an individual perspective, if you go out to a protest, and by doing so block an ambulance from getting to a patient leading to their death. Morally, that death is on you.

            This isn’t any different, by protesting you caused an electoral result that led to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Being part of a group does not absolve you of the results that group causes.

            Again, The road to hell is paved with good intentions. That saying exists for a reason. People do things for the right reasons, but they turn out to have bad consequences all the time.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Protestors made a poor decision

          How else were they supposed to get the democrats to stop driving the bus off the cliff?

          This was not an unforeseen consequence, everyone with a brain was screaming it from the rooftop, and now here we are.

          If it was unforeseen, why do I keep seeing liberals blaming the people who spent 4 years screaming what would happen from the rooftop, while the democrats spent 4 years either trying to be republicans or whining about how powerless they were instead using every measure at their disposal to do what the people whose votes they need are telling them to do?

          It took trump all of a day to enact hundreds of life-changing policies. Don’t give me some horseshit about how the president of the united states was powerless.

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            How else were they supposed to get the democrats to stop driving the bus off the cliff?

            You can’t always get what you want, and sometimes you get what you don’t want. Knowing when is the right time to take action is just as important sometimes as taking action.

            All this protest did was end up with Palestinians in an even worse spot.

            I said it was NOT unforeseen. People knew that these protests would suppress democratic voters, and would be unlikely to sway the current administration. They protested anyways knowing that could cause a Trump victory. Now by the time the next election comes around, there may not be a Palestinian people for the Democratic party to support.

            This situation is the textbook definition of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              People knew that these protests would suppress democratic voters

              The notion that the reason the genocide was unpopular because of the protestors is absurd. The protesters were responding to an incredibly unpopular thing, not causing it to be incredibly unpopular.

              would be unlikely to sway the current administration

              The previous administration stopped running and put Kamala in when they saw they had no pathway to victory, so they’re capable of making changes when they know they have no alternative. It was only the “vote blue no matter who” crowd who allowed them to live under the delusion they could win while trying to be republicans.

              • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                It’s not the genocide that was unpopular because of the protestors, it was voting that was unpopular because of the protest. The protests brought far more attention to the situation, and people stayed home on voting day because of it.

                If you think that the only difference between Democrats and Republicans was their support for the Israeli situation then you’re completely delusional.

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  4 years from now, when democrats are running on building the wall, mass deportations, getting tough on crime, banning trans people from public spaces, and continuing whatever war Trump starts, you will be telling anyone telling the democrats that this is unpopular “shut up, this really is super popular and the democrats really can win by adopting the republican platform from 4 years ago”.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Really, if nobody protested, genocide would have been super popular and Kamala definitely would have won.

        So instead, you decided to vote for the guy campaigning on putting the genocide on a speedrun. That was bright. You sure sent a message. Yesiree. Message was heard loud and clear. Genocide is bad, but super-speed genocide is A-OK! I’m sure the soon-displaced people of Gaza are gonna thank you so much for your support.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I voted PSL, I don’t live in a swingstate.

          If anti-genocide voters are powerful enough to sway the election, you should listen to us.

          Even weeks after October 7th, I had libs demanding I pledge to vote blue whether they stop the genocide or not, even though the election was a year and a half away, instead of standing with us and demanding they stop the wildly unpopular thing they’re doing.

          I think deep down, you all understood that the democrats will never do what the people want, even if they know it will cost them the election.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            If anti-genocide voters are powerful enough to sway the election, you should listen to us.

            The good news for the “We told you so crowd” is that by the next election, we won’t have to. Either it’ll be so far away that none of us will live to see it, or it’ll happen as scheduled but there won’t be a Gaza/Palestine for you to use as justification for letting the worse candidate win.

  • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This will take US to a war, which is even bigger shitshow than Iraq and Afghanistan. It will mean boots on the ground for next 50 years.

    He said that Biden/Kamala will take US to a war, but projection is what he always does.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    “bOTh sIDez ArE thE saME!!!1!” amirite?

    If anyone reading this is one of those “undecideds” or were banging the third party drum and are tired of hearing “we told you so”, well, bad news, buckaroos: You better buckle up because I’m just getting started.


    commented this elsewhere, but the general idea is that by showing that an important contingent of the left won’t vote for a pro genocide president, the democrats will have no choice but to run a candidate that is electable in the future.

    this means that trump might be president in 2024. That sucks, but most of the damage has already been done (supreme court, senate, etc). Might as well show the dems that they have to run a candidate that supports the rights of civilians all around the globe

    @fart@sh.itjust.works This you? How’s that attitude working out for you now, huh? Hope your moral purity eases your conscious because this is partly on YOU.

    Backup links since the post was deleted:

    • fart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      i felt powerless because the dems were supporting genocide, so i tried leveraging what little power i had months out before the election to bluff and say i wouldn’t vote unless they stopped doing genocide in gaza. how is that not CLEARLY the best option?

      why are you blaming anyone but the people fucking killing civilians in gaza? Biden had the ability to end the whole thing with a phone call and didn’t

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Maybe the Dems shouldn’t have ran on “supporting Israel”.

      They could have distinguished themselves on this issue: they chose not to.

      Trump winning is a DIRECT result of how the Democrats campaigned, and how those here, made apologies for their obviously losing choices.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Trump winning is a DIRECT result of how the Democrats campaigned

        How the Democrats campaigned was not the sole cause of Trump winning. Anti-democracy oligarchs, some foreign and some not, some of which control social media, had more to do with it. In my view, whoever the Dems fielded as a candidate, we would have seen a very similar result unless those other causes were very decisively addressed.

      • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You are absolutely wrong. The Democrats were the best case scenario for Gaza and Trump just proved that. You can cry all you want about imperfections with the Democrats but the perfect candidate and the perfect scenario simply does not exist and will not exist. Ever. Do you want to change the Democrats? Then fucking vote in every election, ESPECIALLY the local ones, not just the big ticket ones.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah and they needed to fucking win you oblivious chode. They CHOSE to run a losing campaign, and apologists like yourself defend their incompetence.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            They CHOSE to run a losing campaign

            And how did you discern this? Did you consult your Magic 8-Ball?

          • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            18 hours ago

            They chose to run a losing campaign? Whatever dude… Enjoy the fascism. If you get a chance to ever vote again, maybe think it through a little better.

            • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              They chose to run a losing campaign?

              Yes, pretty clear when they would pivot to the opposite of whatever increased their poll numbers.

              And if they weren’t intentionally trying to lose they ran one of the worst campaigns in recent memory

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Trump winning is a DIRECT result of election interference and years of gerrymandering and voter suppression.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Biden won in 2020. He did so by appealing to the left, bringing the left into the DNC coalition, and growing a coalition to win.

          Harris pivoted to the right from the positions of the 2020 Democratic platform. She picked Liz Cheney as the person to bring into stage, and to give a DNC five minute talking spot to a Republican war hawk instead of a Gazan, actual DNC delegate.

          Harris MADE these decisions. And it was fucking stupid. And it was stupid then. It was obvious where the voters were. She CHOSE not to go get them.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Bruh they couldn’t even get their own voters out. The ones who voted for them in 2020.

              That’s not voter suppression. It’s a failure of leadership on the part of Democrats for the duration of the Biden presidency, and a refusal on the part of Harris to acknowledge and chart a new course.

              The DNC campaigned to fail in 2024, and it was obvious the entire time.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                19 hours ago

                If they make it physically harder to go out and vote, such as closing polling stations, if they use misinformation campaigns those will affect the turn out. Yes Kamala not having a Palestinian go on to talk was deplorable, she should have done more. However trump said he would be a dictator on day one, deport immigrants, and tons of other fascist shit and those same people you said couldn’t even turn up to vote for their own party were ok with what trump was going to do.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Literally genocide.

    As opposed to the fake over exaggerated genocide the Free Palestine protesters were uppity about. Let’s raise you a real fucking Genocide.

    Both sides tho.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      fake over exaggerated genocide

      Libs going mask off. Genocidal denial won’t reverse the dem’s complete failure.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        54 minutes ago

        Free Palestine going full mask off. They don’t even bother protesting over Trump or recent actions as things get worse. It was all bullshit.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      That was genocide too. This is just a faster and more ruthless genocide. Those were the options offered to American voters, and they chose Nazism, extra genocide, and plunder by billionaires.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        It’s revealing how libs cry far more about the very few people opposing genocide than about the millions of people in an extremely racist society calling for more genocide.

  • ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Lol thanks for your vote (and non votes) suckers! Just don’t call it genocide. Watch netanyahu’s face during the press conference. Trump is a useful idiot and he and other leaders know it.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      There are no leopards eating faces. But people are literally being genocided in palestine. Maybe find something real and worthwhile to cry about.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Well if there is, they will send you to checks notes El Salvador. El Salvador? That shit came out of left field. Is it nice there? Any extra judicial killings or what not?

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The right loves him because he reduced the rates of crime in El Salvador.

          Problem is that his approach was to just throw everything that moves in a slightly funny way in jail. This does admittedly reduce crime, but in a similar way to how a nuclear bomb really is the most effective crime reduction tool - if you kill everyone on the planet, no one can commit any crimes, hence the crime rate will be 0.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            because he reduced the rates of crime in El Salvador

            According to his own government’s statistics.

            He has also offered to house (which probably means “neglect, enslave and torture”) immigrants sent to El Salvador by the Musk/Trump junta.