Five Microsoft employees were removed during a company town hall meeting after staging a protest against the company’s contracts supplying Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cloud computing services to the Israeli occupation military.

The demonstration took place on Monday, following an Associated Press (AP) investigation that revealed Microsoft and OpenAI’s advanced AI models had been utilised by the Israeli occupation military to select bombing targets in recent attacks against Gaza and Lebanon.

  • nocteb@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isn’t that nice! Having a moral dilemma to decide which hospital to bomb? Just let AI decide! It’s not your fault anymore just press the button!

  • RalziTech@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t blame them for protesting. Yeah, admittedly AI is cool n’ all, but you don’t need to encourage an entire military to get in on it.

  • Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Only five people at Microsoft gave enough fucks to protest. It should have been all of them. They should strike for fucks sakes.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      In my experience the majority of tech workers don’t give a fuck about the moral implications of their work. They often justify it with “if I don’t do it someone else will.”

      Source: am tech worker, see it all the time

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    No matter where you are in an organization, unless you’re csuite, you’re nothing. Always remember that. You do not get a say, your opinion is tolerated at best. I’ve known people at MSFT for decades and they think they’re opinion matters. It doesn’t. Tomorrow some exec will come in and stomp on you. Work to live, don’t live to work. Them saying this is good, but I like to remind people that they won’t care. Money talks.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      as long as people are applying to MS position jobs, the employees protesting means very little. and you see what companies did to the job review sites, sued them into being astroturfed.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plenty of moral people work for immoral companies all the time. This isn’t some big gatcha as much as it is a complete dismissal akin to the way a C-Suite exec might completely dismiss your opinion.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        People have families to feed. How long are you willing to go without income before you consider Amazon or Meta? How long do your morals hold up before you’re facing eviction. It’s super easy to hold to them and judge others when you’re fully employed, but buddy I gotta tell you, I’ve been laid off twice in 3 years, and I stared down losing my house or taking a job at big tech. I was lucky that a smaller company came in last second and I landed there, but I hold zero ill will to those who work there.

        Most of them have no assumptions to what they do, but individuals need to feed their families, to provide a roof over their heads, they have kids who need college paid for or medical insurance. You judge them, but I question what you would do in the same position. If you were facing losing your home and you had Amazon sitting there offering more money then you’ve ever made - how long would you hold onto those morals?

        I don’t even expect an answer. I don’t expect it to be truthful.

        • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Is the fact that you’re so defensive over my comment not an indication for you to do a little introspection?

          You can’t claim the moral high ground if you’re enabling the very thing you’re complaining about.

          I don’t comprehend why people find this controversial other than that they may be uncomfortable with their own choices and dislike when some random on the internet has pointed it out to them.

          If I worked for Microsoft I wouldn’t wear a shirt complaining about my work being used to kill kids because I would have the presence of mind to realise that I would be a hypocrite if I did that.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It doesn’t seem controversial at all. People seem to pretty consistently say your take sucks and that you’re wrong.

            • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              People on Lemmy (and the tech community) also skew heavily to tech industries so I’m not surprised they are shocked and disagree that saying you work for Microsoft is a bad thing.

              • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                No one disagreed that it’s a bad thing. (Go ahead, reread it) But it’s an understandable thing. That’s the point you’re not getting.

      • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah fuck the 2+ million people working for big tech. They don’t deserve work unless it’s for a genuine, good-hearted startup.

        • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          I took the hit to my overall earnings by not working for a corporation that kills the planet/tramples on workers rights/engages in war crimes.

          Have you?

            • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Yes, yes, yes, no.

              If your point is that I engage in immoral practices; of course I do.

              That wasn’t my initial argument though.

              As I have said in another comment, if I worked for Microsoft I wouldn’t wear a shirt complaining about my work killing people in a foreign country because I would realise that makes me a hypocrite.

              In the same way I wouldn’t be vegan, work for an abattoir and complain to my CEO that killing animals is wrong.

              • ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                23 hours ago

                so what’s the argument? I’ve been vegan since Obama was president and bike or transit to my job at a public institution; are you just not on my level? personally I’m relieved some of the people stuck at microsoft actually give a shit, probably not enough of them, but it’s still a good thing. I’m not in the tech sector but I can appreciate the fact that change has to come from individuals who are toiling within our current system - and that most definitely includes people willing to speak up against the awful shit the c-suite is responsible for choosing to engage in.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I’m not just talking about employment. At some point, we all engage in something that leads to something immoral and unethical.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Company Town Halls are “we listen to you” theatre.

      Modern large companies behave towards their employees the same way they behave towards their customers: they use marketing to influence them into doing what’s best for the C-suite, the Board and (usually) shareholders.

      In Tech specifically this kind of crap has been common since the 90s even in Startups (as part of the “pay them with hope, sense of belonging and pride rather than money” technique), though the big Tech companies are the most extreme in this kind of stuff.

    • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      At most large companies, this isn’t too uncommon. Town Halls are not the same as town halls elected officials might stage.

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think that should be expected given the governing structure of almost all large companies, because they’re dictatorships. Employees have no say over who’s in leadership, and can be fired more or less without recourse. You wouldn’t expect a town hall in Russia or North Korea to allow dissent, would you?

        • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          100% correct.

          When you work for a corporation, you are working for a dictatorship. You have the power to choose which dictatorship you’d like to work for, but you only have whatever power they let you have.

          Power that can be snatched away any time of their choosing.