• Sovereign@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      This place is pretty far left dude lol. You wont find anyone pro israel here.

  • Cadenza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Well everybody already knows that. Like… The power dynamics of “vote lesser evil, vote for minority candidate, vote for a compromising pseudo-progressive party because it’s still something, abstain and stay pure, better face true fascists than traitors, etc.” has been around since representative regimes emerged. Yet everyone has to find his/her political and moral stance in this shitshow. And answers will differ, sometimes for legitimate reasons, sometimes because of total bs. That’s all there is to it and it’s not exactly news.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Running a feckless campaign that refused to break with Biden’s admin on genocide is why we got this living hell. And running the most unlikeable woman in the country in 2016 is what made 2024 even a possibility.

    Dems have fucked up terribly.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That about sums it up.

      I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

      But fuck me, I’d love to vote for something else. And I’ll be honest, I have no idea how we get anything better.

      I hear people saying to organize, but I can’t even imagine what that takes. I wonder if most Americans feel as helpless as I do in the face of this absolute bullshit.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

        Unfortunately, much of what the Democrats represent is fascism.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Depends on what you mean by “much”? I’d argue the Democrats, on the whole, are liberals, not fascists.

          I’d certainly prefer progressives and leftists though.

          The support for Israel whole they genocide Palestine, thought… ugh. That can certainly be viewed as fascism, although where you draw the distinction between fascism and imperialism is up for debate. Not that imperialism is good either, just saying.

          • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            Liberals are the only people in history to vote for fascists to prevent class solidarity, and they’ve done it every time.

            If you scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets. They have completely given up their agency and just accept this impotent logic of “we’ll take whatever the most obvious/most apparently easy option is, that isn’t a Republican”. It’s a cyclical problem, the voters don’t care enough to force politicians to be good, and the politicians don’t care enough to court voters.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

          Perhaps it would be more accurate to say “you get what you fight for, and if you don’t fight you get what you get.”

          I… haven’t really fought for anything. I believed the right things. I voted as best I could. But that clearly didn’t stop this.

          I want to protect my ego and say I’m not a coward. Is there a distinction to be made between cowardice and simply not knowing what to do? I don’t know. I just know I’m trying my best, but maybe that’s just not enough.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Democratic Party as a whole is like milk in your fridge that’s a week past its “best by” date.

    The Republican Party is milk that a dog vomited on a Texas in July sidewalk.

    We’re drinking one of them, because no alternative is possible in the near term.

    It’s possible to vote for Democrats in 2026 and '28 and '30 and '32 while we build an alternative that can have electoral success, or takeover the Democratic Party from within or heck turn the Republican Party into a party worth supporting…

      • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Great. Now you’re dying of thirst and the only milk left is the dog throw up vomit.

        You can’t game the system by just saying you would do it better. That’s not how it works.

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          So keeping with your analogy, you’re going against ever bit of legitimate survival advice from every single person that has any knowledge on survival, and you think you’re still making the right choice?

          In any situation where clean water isn’t an option you still don’t drink things that will sicken you.

          You can work to purify whatever liquid you have (which can be the easiest or worst option), you can leave the area and try to find safer sources of water, or you can piss in your own mouth for a while and try to do one of the other two things in the mean time.

          Voters like you, however, drink the spoiled milk, diarrhea in your own mouths, while promising if you keep doing it you’ll get around to purifying your own milk laden shits if you just keep funding genocide.

          You can’t change a rotted system from within anymore than you can survive on contaminated water. At best you’re making your life so much worse while deluding yourself into thinking you’re doing the right thing.

    • dx1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      80 million Dem voters (depicted as “crowd of NPCs” meme): “We are voting for Democrats in the near term because there is no other option”

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “average at democracy” is when you aggressively expand the world’s largest police state while persuing a policy of genocide.

    • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Most people wanted to stop sending money for wars, and Democrats kept sending money for wars. Most people wanted to defund the police and democrats tripled the police budget. That is not a democracy. That is the total opposite of a democracy.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ll keep saying it, the DNC is a sunk cost. You will keep trying to get them to stand up for you; get them to care; get them to fight. They will keep taking your energy; taking your money; and taking your vote and do nothing with it.

    Big donors have recognized it. It’s time for the people to recognize it too. That means you.

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The blue MAGA types are moooostly on .world, but they have the most users, so… .ml are mostly CCP with the same degree of dedication, and blahaj is that but with Likud. I just block .world and blahaj because they are right wingers beyond saving.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    For sure, about %90 of them voted No to Sander’s stop weapon sale to Israel resolution. They are worthless pieces of shits which would switch to the republican party at the blink of an eye had they thought their position in the Democrat party was insecure.

    If I thought that the democrat party was the only viable option to defeat Trump would I vote for democrats instead of say, voting a third party? Without a second of doubt, yes. We don’t even need to debate whether the Democrat party is marginally better than the Republican party or not. The main important difference is that if Trump wins (which he did) half of the country is going to cheer for every vile shit he does (which they do) and this will enable them to carry this vile shit into their personal lives (which they also do).

    On the other hand if Kamala were to do such vile shit (granted there is imo %0 chance she could be this worse on almost all matters) at least she would get booed by the people who voted for her. There is a very big difference between how much these reactions enable a president to do even more extreme shit or not and whether if people are encouraged to replicate such behaviour on a local level or not.

    So instead of waiting until the last 90 days and then suddenly going “DON’T VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS LETS CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY WOHOO”, start working from now to make the third options more viable. Then it will be more sincere and useful.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The Democratic Party on the whole is captured by the donor class as a direct result of Citizens United. This has led to the hollowing out of the grassroots movements that are necessary for a large coalition of diverse interests to compete against the oligarchic cabal that makes up the GOP. This decimated the rank and file operatives that used networking within their communities to create political action and replaced it with endless fundraising emails, even as the primary process was corrupted (Hillary v Bernie, Biden v Bernie) to remove clout from the progressive wing of the party.

    This led to the disillusionment of many Democratic voters that they have any say in the nomination process (the last time we had a real primary was Obama 2008 - almost 20 years ago), and the result is a slate of weak centrist candidates that for the most part play lip service to liberal cultural issues while blocking any real progressive economic progress.

    The purpose of the Democratic Party apparatus as it exists in 2025 America is to capture and dilute revolutionary energy, so that people don’t take to the streets and demand real change. Yes, there are some independents and good folks within the Democratic Party trying to make a change (AOC, Jasmine Crocket) but the power players (Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries) are still refusing to stand up to the overt fascist takeover of our country.

    The system as it exists will not change, and without change, we’re barreling into a fascism induced depression and possible civil war that will likely ravage the planet.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You would think committing a genocide would’ve settled the whole “lesser evil” thing, but the Blue MAGA cult insists there’s a way to commit lesser evil genocide now.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The problem with people with like you is you listen to what the Dems say they’re doing, and don’t bother to confirm what Dems are actually doing. It’s why you’re all terrified of Trump’s immigration policies, and have no clue that Obama & Biden deported way more people.

        You’re in a cult.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Does the way in which they are deported matter?

          Is it better when they target people who are undocumented and provably so vs just checking out everyone tanner than a Mainer in the winter?

          Do you see a difference between the specific policies of the two administrations?

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Youre going to keep doing this lesser evil bit until the dems have you seig heiling while the republicans drain your blood for the ritual to begin Armageddon.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Hold up. You believe the Dems & GOP are swapping out frontline ICE and CBP agents during power transitions?

            • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              No, I think the administrators on top are switched and they give different marching orders. They enforce policy differently based on who is in the Oval office and that administration’s decisions. That is why there is a difference in how these deportations were carried out.

              Do you think the top agents determine policy for an agency?

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                7 hours ago

                This is why no one takes Dem voters seriously. Y’all believe the press releases matter more than the material actions.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  the only voters that aren’t taken seriously in the USA are leftists and if you doubt that for a second please point out the progressive party that controls anything in this shithole.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  My whole point is the material actions of the two administrations do differ. Trump is targeting anyone not white whereas Biden at least targeted people with legal violations. One policy puts all immigrants in fear while the other theoretically should not.

                  The fact that you can’t see the difference isn’t something I can help you with.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        If you somehow managed to reduce all of American politics into two sides, neither democrats nor republicans would be on yours.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The Democratic Party got wallopped in the last election because they stood up for marginalized. They got trounced in 2010 because they fought to provide access to healthcare to those who couldn’t get it. Biden tried to forgive student loans and young people couldn’t bother to show up to the pols in 2022. Lazy edge lord potheads don’t show up to vote

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They lost in 2024 because they couldn’t address the economy and kept sending billions to Israel as it was committing a very public genocide lol, not because they stood up for people.

      • Hikermick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah that’s probably why the GOP ran non stop ads about transvestites playing in school sports.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The largest plurality (29%) of people who voted for Biden in 2020 but stayed home in 2024 said that Gaza was their biggest reason for not voting. The Democrats aren’t considering pulling their support for Israel, but they have been fighting internally over being less supportive trans people. The idea that they lost because they just wouldn’t stop fighting for marginalized people is just not connected to reality, and it’s very possible they’ll be standing up for even less people by 2026.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        We had Hitler under control! Everything was going according to plan!

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Obama and Biden said they’d legalize weed. They didn’t. They failed to put abortion rights into the constitution. I mean I can go on these are just off the top of my head.

    They are not immune to legit criticism, however it seems like people get the idea that if you criticize democrats that means you are a die hard Trumper or something…

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Didn’t close gitmo. Didn’t end the war on terror. Created the same border camps democrats cry at the gates of for political points. Bailed out the perpetrators of one of this countries most high profile and damaging financial crimes because they held rich peoples stock portfolios hostage. Made pointless concessions on the ACA to republicans who never once cross the isle for even the things they want to pass because they’d rather take the credit themselves.

      Those are the ones I’m pulling off the top of my head.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Probably because two political parties isn’t enough to truly represent the population.

        People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world’s smallest box.

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Countries with more parties such as those in Western Europe are also electing fascists. The answer doesn’t lie in more parties. China has a majority party and it doesn’t get people doing the Sieg Heil

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Duverger’s Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we’re going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that’s what you’re looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            The major political parties may have only changed names once, but the most common stance in modern political science is that we are in the 6th political party alignment in US history.

            • Centralization 1796-1824
            • Jacksonians 1828-1852
            • Republicans 1856-1892
            • Progressives 1898-1928
            • New Dealers 1932-1972
            • Neoliberalism 1980-Present