European New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) — an independent and well-regarded safety body for the automotive industry — is set to introduce new rules in January 2026 that require the vehicles it assesses to have physical controls to receive a full five-star safety rating.

While Euro NCAP testing is voluntary, it is widely backed by several EU governments with companies like Tesla, Volvo, VW, and BMW using their five-star scores to boast about the safety of their vehicles to potential buyers.

“The overuse of touchscreens is an industry-wide problem, with almost every vehicle-maker moving key controls onto central touchscreens, obliging drivers to take their eyes off the road and raising the risk of distraction crashes,” said Matthew Avery, director of strategic development at Euro NCAP, to the Times. To be eligible for the maximum safety rating after the new testing guidelines go into effect, cars will need to use buttons, dials, or stalks for hazard warning lights, indicators, windscreen wipers, SOS calls, and the horn.

The Euro NCAP’s safety guidelines aren’t a legal requirement, however, car makers take safety ratings pretty seriously, so any risk of points being docked during such assessments is likely to be taken into consideration.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The button might be 1c, but you gotta wire it, install it, warranty it etc etc. It’s not as inconsequential as you might think. And there’s a lot of them.

    A screen is the screen and the wiring to the computer.

    It’s a couple skus to maintain instead of dozens. It’s 1 warranty item instead of dozens.

    Also if one piece of that dash isn’t available, one button, one wire etc, it can slow production. So a single screen can be a smoother production line experience

    edit: Also all cars are already required to have a screen for the backup camera, so there’s already a mandatory cost there. It’s not like they can just forgo a screen entirely.

    It might not be a good idea, but it absolutely will save a noticeable amount of money per vehicle.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      it absolutely will save a noticeable amount of money per vehicle.

      I don’t believe that.

      Monroe has talked about how they removed some bolts that weren’t absolutely necessary from the vehicle, saving them hundreds of thousands of dollars. In that case, it’s fine. In this case I think it’s the same situation except they don’t care about driver safety. If the driver is fucking with touchscreens and crashes, that’s gonna be on the driver.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        You’re contradicting yourself LOL

        I don’t believe that.

        Monroe has talked about how they removed some bolts that weren’t absolutely necessary from the vehicle, saving them hundreds of thousands of dollars. In that case, it’s fine.

        Its okay if you don’t like it, but come on dude, a screen is going to be cheaper by 10s or maybe a hundred dollars a car. Were talking 10s of millions or more saved with any company doing this at scale.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          You’re contradicting yourself LOL

          No I’m not ROFLCOPTER. We were discussing “per vehicle”.

          a screen is going to be cheaper by 10s or maybe a hundred dollars a car

          10s, yes. Like maybe 15 or 20 bucks in BOM and labor. Hundreds, no.

          Were talking 10s of millions or more saved with any company doing this at scale

          Money saved to the company, not the end user. The end user just receives a severely degraded and unsafe experience.

          I mean shit, let’s just remove all the seats, that’ll save THOUSANDS per car, right!?

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You don’t genuinely believe anyone is installing and wiring up individual buttons in a car, do you? That whole row of buttons is delivered as a single unit just like the screen is and will have a single connector just like the screen does. Sure, you then have to install and test two units (screen and buttons) but that is about it in terms of extra work.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Lol of course not, but it’s assembled somewhere (with people or expensive robots) which is why it has a cost more than the simple cost of the button itself. It’s a bespoke piece of hardware specifically designed for the vehicle instead of a commodity LCD screen which can be mass produced for multiple vehicles, (edit and as I said, is already required in the vehicle for a backup camera at a bare minimum, so it’s just the upgrade cost for a slightly more expensive screen, not a screen vs no screen)