America sucks. Israel sucks. Capitalism is collapsing. Kill all slave owners. Fuck the police. Fuck centrists. Fuck landlords. McDonalds tastes like piss. I think rich people should be in gulags. Crackers can’t cook. The Dems let Trump win. You probably can’t even read this because your education system is gutted.

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    5 days ago

    The shock liberalization of the Russian economy caused a massive drop in the quality of life that lead to millions of deaths and created the conditions for a strong arm man like Putin to come to power.

  • hotspur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    5 days ago

    The frequency of “HEXBEARS BAD, plz defederate” posts I’ve seen from some of the libbier instances has been higher the last week or two.

    Amusingly most of them, once you review their post history to see what the unpleasant interaction they had was, seem to just be weird blue maga trolls. I still don’t get the concept of centrist trolls, like it just doesn’t compute.

    Silver lining, all the defed posts reminded me that I don’t have to suffer having .world in my feed thanks to instance blocking.

    • egonallanon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      5 days ago

      I still find it funny that the majority of anticommunist posts I’ve seen are from people on instances who aren’t federated with hexbear but they’re just upset hexbear has fixed it’s federation issues which is very funny to me.

      • Future_Honkey [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        There’re a few wannabe power mods railing against hexbear et al who really want to grow the fediverse to be the next big thing so they can feel important. Specifically their instances. I feel like those guys don’t hate commies, they hate the fact they don’t have any power on those servers. Without us around, they wouldfind a reason to hate every instance that they didn’t directly control

      • hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, in most of the ones I’ve seen, they’re just pissed Hexbear exists it seems. Most of them also have no interest in discussion, they seem to only want internet community for mirroring their convictions.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      5 days ago

      I still don’t get the concept of centrist trolls, like it just doesn’t compute.

      Centrists make sense when you realize they’re just right-wingers in denial, purposefully or not.

      You never hear shit from them that’s remotely left-wing, it’s always right-wing radio shock jockey bullshit disguised as “I’m a centrist, but

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I bet it’s every accusation a confession. Like they assume we have an ahistorical stance that isn’t tempered with theory because they don’t. They probably graft things that feel good, things they heard on TV, and anecdotes over uncomfortable situations. If we’re saying “the world would be more or peaceful with WITHOUT I MEANT WITHOUT Israel and the US” they probably think saying something like “tariffs are what happen when you don’t vote for Kamala” has equal sting and edginess. The fact that you come back and disagree with them defies their sense of the terminal nature of mud slinging. There’s no Liberal Manifesto. What are they going to read? Kierkegard? You going to debate a communist with some shit written by Kissinger or something? You going to misunderstand Martlin Luther King Jr? No! You said something mean and the lefties were ready to talk about it and that’s bewildering.

      • hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah ok your point about “there’s no liberal manifesto” neatly describes what I think I was trying to articulate. Which is, I understand more extreme behaviors from left and right—they’re farther from the cultural setpoint, and the farther you are from where you think you should be, the sorta stronger your rhetoric and convictions need to be in order to have a hope of moving things closer to a world you want. But for the liberal it’s basically just I mostly support the status quo (with small incremental changes to social issues at home!), and because of that, anything that’s not roughly the status quo represents a threat immediately.

        Also I wonder in some cases, if it actually requires more mental gymnastics and cognitive dissonance to maintain a pure liberal viewpoint, than to reside in the right or left. At least when you’re on either side of the spectrum, you have clear thoughts about how you disagree with the present and the direction things need to move, but if you are a status quo enjoyer, you have to somehow discount and explain away internally any thing that is ugly or not working, which is how we saw tons of these liberals urging us to tolerate an actual genocide in favor of preventing a hypothetically worse future genocide under Trump. And certainly, Trump will most likely be as bad or worse for Palestinians, but it was just shocking to see people claiming to hold progressive tendencies accepting what happened to Palestinians over the last year + of the Biden regime.

        Clearly there were no actual red lines in terms of what actions were acceptable to undertake, instead it was: no matter how horrible our actions are, they are at least going to be slightly better than the opposition.

        • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          5 days ago

          David Adler, from the University of Oxford’s Department of Politics & International Relations, published a study in 2018, that demonstrated that in surveys of their views “centrists” were meaningfully, contrary to conventional rhetoric, more anti-democratic, least supportive of democratic institutions, and most supportive of what he classifies as “authoritarianism”.

          (That catch-all term again, I know) debord-tired

          It’s not very long (it’s mostly survey results and graphs) and you can read it here.

          I do think that you could argue that this is a manifestation of their ideology being predicated not on a fixed ideology or particular material reality, but on an almost gnostic belief in their own position as being simply ‘the right one’ and therefore all others being inherently worthless or even malevolent. It’s essentially the divine right of kings but for self-defined superior wonks.

          The benefit of having an ideology that’s so rootless and immaterial is that you can shift to whatever position is neccessarily to maintain the status you create for yourself. The downside is that its immateriality means that it’s a mirage, an illusion of a position, and so any alternative beyond its current makeup cannot be valid, but also the illusion cannot exist without defining itself against them.

          All outside perspectives become an existential threat and can only be proclaimed to be untrue and from bad actors. Your material experience of the economy is wrong, everything’s great! Views beyond my centerist consensus can’t be real people, it must be disinfo spread by bots! Jewishness is definied by my narrow defininition the ‘correct’ amount of support for Israel in this moment! Yes, we wrote articles for 20 years about the worrying influence of neo-Nazism in Ukraine, but they’ve all just stopped being Nazis and are democratic patriots! History is sacrosanct until it differs with the personally beneficial version I was taught! We believe in science until listening to scientists on the climate or Covid would negatively influence my lifestyle or stock portfolio! And so on.

          • hotspur@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            Always a pleasure to see concepts well-explained. Thanks for this, much more precise than whatever stumbling articulation I was trying to get to haha.

              • hotspur@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                Yeah i always regret interacting with Lemmy only via my phone, I feel like it limits how well I’m going to be able to express/ articulate, but in any case I appreciated how you framed it—was useful to improve / expand my thinking on it.

          • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            I do think that you could argue that this is a manifestation of their ideology being predicated not on a fixed ideology or particular material reality, but on an almost gnostic belief in their own position as being simply ‘the right one’ and therefore all others being inherently worthless or even malevolent. It’s essentially the divine right of kings but for self-defined superior wonks.

            Here’s a relevant George Carlin joke/quote about this exact psychological concept that has always stuck with me:

            Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?

              • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                I’m glad you liked it. Unfortunately, I feel that it’s broader than that and speaks to general human nature. I think the issue becomes when some people weaponize this conviction that they are at just the right level of whatever scale they’re measuring against.

        • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          5 days ago

          But for the liberal it’s basically just I mostly support the status quo (with small incremental changes to social issues at home!), and because of that, anything that’s not roughly the status quo represents a threat immediately.

          The Kingdom of Conscience will be exactly as it is now. Moralists don’t really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child’s toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn’t change – not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth.

          • hotspur@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah I think this why I’m always sorta weirded out by rabid behavior from centrists. There’s a tacit subconscious understanding somewhere that tells me they don’t have significant beliefs, so how could they be so invested? But this and some of the other replies make a good case for why this might be so; they’re fighting for control and the maintenance of status, and any change, whether forward or backwards, must necessarily represent, by virtue of their constructed reality, a diminishment of their power and status.

        • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ll one-up you: the Harry Potter series. This configuration of government was talked about in Harry Potter 4: Deathly Hollows when Harry had to demean a dementor:

          blahblahlblahablaalhabalhalabalhabalh

  • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 days ago

    America sucks. Israel sucks. Capitalism is collapsing.

    This doesn’t trigger them nearly as much as saying “China does some things well.” Or any non US aligned state. Liberals are much more willing to concede that domestic policy is bad but never cross the foreign policy party line.

    • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Look I’m not going to sit here and say the US doesn’t have a whole lot of problems, but I do hope the state department and NATO achieve all of their goals and continues to project power and untold misery across the globe because the Chinese or anyone outside of international-community-1 international-community-2 would be even worse smuglord

    • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think people instinctively understand that foreign policy is largely managed by unelected three-letter agency bureaucrats who couldn’t care less about who happens to be president in a given year. So foreign policy is outside of electoral politics and therefore outside of the concern of most Americans. Not to mention so much information is classified that the public can barely hold an informed opinion.

      All of the above makes it easy to believe that somehow American foreign policy is immune to the clown show tendencies that pervade domestic electoral politics. We are also in the afterglow of Hoover’s FBI which was wildly successful in shaping the image of the government as a set of elite organizations run by the brightest people in the country.

        • kmaismith@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          As an American who cares about things which don’t directly affect me i must admit the cultural apathy is an intense beast to overcome. i, for one, appreciate the perpetual chastising that comes from this community

          • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            5 days ago

            Same. Socialism without internationalism is still barbarism and Hexbear doesn’t usually forget it. I peruse /r/deprogram when things are getting spicy in the world and they have a bad impulse for American exceptionalism and chauvinism.

  • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    crackers can’t cook

    Talk to me when you’ve had my midwestern mother-in-laws cheesey salmon casserole.

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 days ago

        Many westerners come to socialism not out of necessity, but out of disillusionment. We are raised with the idea that Liberal Democracy is the best system of political expression humanity has devised. When confronted with the reality of its shortcomings, rather than narrowly discard liberalism or electoralism, the western anti-capitalist tends to draw sweeping conclusions about the inadequacy of all existing systems. Curiously, though it would at first seem that such denunciations are more principled and severe, they are in fact more compatible with existing and widespread beliefs about the supremacy of the western system. That is to say, when a Marxist-Leninist asserts the superiority of existing socialist experiments, they are directly challenging the idea that westerners are at the forefront of political development. By contrast, the assertions from anarchists and social democrats that we need to build a more utopian future out of our current apex are compatible not only with each other, as discussed earlier, but also do not really offend bourgeois society at large. They in fact end up not sounding too different from the arch-imperialist Winston Churchill holding forth on how ours is the worst system, except for all the others which have been tried. Western chauvinists, consciously or unconsciously, struggle with the idea that they should study and humbly take lessons from the imperial periphery. [15] It is much easier for the chauvinist, psychologically, to position oneself as at the very front of a new vanguard.

        from https://redsails.org/why-marxism/

    • VOLCEL_POLICE [it/its]@hexbear.netB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The VOLCEL POLICE are on the scene! PLEASE KEEP YOUR VITAL ESSENCES TO YOURSELVES AT ALL TIMES.

      نحن شرطة VolCel.بناءا على تعليمات الهيئة لترويج لألعاب الفيديو و النهي عن الجنس نرجوا الإبتعاد عن أي أفكار جنسية و الحفاظ على حيواناتكم المنويَّة حتى يوم الحساب. اتقوا الله، إنك لا تراه لكنه يراك.

      volcel-police

  • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Y’all need better hobbies.

    But them again, all of your points are true (except there are plenty of crackers outside of the US that can cook)