Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days ago

On trees...

mander.xyz

message-square
182
fedilink
1.38K

On trees...

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 days ago
message-square
182
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    theres also a definition of a what a tree in the sense , its develops wood, many things are tree like, but not trees: such as palms(just overgrown herbs), dracaena( aka cabbage tree, they have something dracenoid thickining.) extinct plants like giant lycophytes and ferns

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Same for roots, btw, just earlier.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    There are fern trees, conifer trees, and flowering trees. Where are my moss trees?

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/dendrolycopodium/dendroideum/

      https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/204198-Dendrolycopodium-obscurum

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Except clubmoss isn’t moss iirc? They’re vascular and more of a fern than moss.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Shhhh hahaha

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I wasn’t ready for how weird this comment section turned out to be…

    • EstonianGuy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Based on your username, you should be used to weird shit.

      • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t mean I can’t still be awe’d though!

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Arborization !

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Concentrated sun energy sinks

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    So if you look at a tiny blade of grass and a gigantic tree its like looking at a Chihuahua and a brachiosaurus. And there are smaller things and bigger things in the aminal kingdum!

    • Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s also mindblowing that chihuahua and tibetan mastiff belong to the same species even tho they look entirely different.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        also that humans did that is wild

  • Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I always liked the idea of being a tree like life form.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Imagine looking down at a bunch of cute little things crawling all over you for hundreds of years and then one day one of them shows up with an axe

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Or maybe the microorganisms and food sources that life forms are exposed to have more of an effect on how the macroorganisms evolve than is currently talked about, which would explain why so many things in similar environments evolve similar traits.

  • andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, I’m just a product of my environment.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    By the logic we are not humans…

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      no, we didn’t have mice and also ants evolve into humans… there’s one distinct line of ancestors…
      it’s called convergent evolution. check out wikipedia

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      logic

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Are at least all woody plants related?

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      As far as they are all vascular plants, but that’s like, basically everything that isn’t moss iirc.

      The evolution of wood is common because it’s simple for cellulose to get denser in response to a need to grow taller to outcompete your neighbors.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        So trees are the “evolve to crabs” meme and wood is like a crab shell. Or, I guess just exoskeleton, because things that aren’t crabs also have hard shells.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Kinda! But the shell isn’t what the carcinization memes are referring to. I’d say the biggest part of carcinization is the loss of crustacean tails. Basically every false crab is in the process of losing their tail in favor of a rounder body plan

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I was under the impression that structural lignin was what really made trees a viable style of growth, and that seems like an odd chemical for a bunch of unrelated plants to all evolve. Is there something I’m missing? Is lignin actually present in all vascular plants?

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I wasn’t being specific enough. Cell walls in plants are composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Lignin IS one of the structural polymers that plants produce, and yea, every single vascular plant has and uses lignin to provide structure. Iirc its a polymer produced by every plant, including mosses and other nonvascular plants, it’s just not used to the same extent.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            AH, I see. So, it already existed, but until trees evolved, it wasn’t used to such an extreme extent.

            • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yea, the evolution of vascularity in plants let them get off the ground in the first place (meaning being taller than a few inches). Vascularity is the first big jump plants made after leaving the water. From there, being taller means outcompeting your neighbors and spreading your babies further. When you have that double whammy of more food + more babies, you get a selective pressure for taller that never really goes away. This is why multiple families have species that have arborized and have continuously done so over their evolutionary history. If the niche is empty, something will jump into it, often sooner rather than later (on a deep time scale) which is basically the whole idea of convergent evolution as a whole.

  • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    8 days ago

    Had to look it up because I didnt beleive

    sure enough its correct

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Scishow had an episode about it a week ago. It’s a strategy, not a species.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      ·
      8 days ago

      Something poetic and quaint about a link to a Wikipedia article titled “Tree”

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        7 days ago

        reddit has broken me. I was expecting it to point to weed.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          7 days ago

          Here you go.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            7 days ago

            Reddit has broken me. I was expecting a rickroll

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              7 days ago

              sooo glad I wasn’t alone.

              anyhow, here’s a fun song.

        • Rusty@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I was expecting an undirected acyclic graph.

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yo momma so fat she sat on a binary tree and squashed it into a linked list in O(1) time.

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              is a binary tree equivalent to a 2D KD-tree ?

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              That happens to me constantly

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Also cool that for a period of like 60 million years, nothing decomposed dead trees. As they would die or fall over, they’d just stay there, piling up. This is where most oil came from. The massive amounts of trees stacking up before bacteria and fungus evolved to decomposed them. Imagine 60 million years worth of trees just lying around.

    *Thought I’d add an edit, since this post got quite a few eyes on it: It was mostly coal that all those trees turned into. Not oil.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mushrooms are the great undertaker, the great decomposer. The Langoliers. They are just waiting to eat you, and they’re happy to share their fruits in the meantime. They’re fattening you up. They can wait.

      • voracread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That Langoliers reference spotted in the wild!

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Now we do the dance of joy!

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I remember a flimsy tv film with even flimsier CGI spherical creatures eating the planet

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I was struggling to explain the plot of this one to my gf just the other day. Had to pull out screenshots of the TV movie to make it make sense.

    • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      I thought that was coal

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      I imagine dead trees were flammable, even back then. And oxygen levels were 15% higher. Can you imagine the forest fires?

      • Crassus@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fire wasn’t invented back then

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          And after it was invented, it was only in black and white until the 1950s

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      7 days ago

      Didn’t those trees become coal, not oil?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes. I made mention of this in a reply to someone else as well. I’m not sure if my teacher (like 30 years ago) told us wrong or if I simply remembered it wrong.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I think near water they became oil and far from water they became coal

        • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          55
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, most coal comes from plants in swamps, because the water helped preserve the organic matter.

          Plants in swamps die -> organic matter on the bottom of the swamp -> peat -> brown coal -> black coal.

          Oil apparently comes mostly from plankton.

          On the different origins: https://www.carboeurope.org/how-are-fossil-fuels-formed-the-science-behind-oil-coal-and-natural-gas/

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            Cool

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oil was effectively plankton and other sea stuff.

          Coal was forests.

          • Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Brother I finally found you.

            We come from the same place you and me. Remember that barn?

    • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I love this fact, and am curious where you learned it?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        7 days ago

        I learned it nearly 30 years ago in school. I just did a search and found a link about it, though.

        Also, seems that either I remembered wrongly, or my teacher made a mistake, but it seems it was most of the worlds coal; not oil, that came from all the piles of trees from that period.

        https://www.thorogood.co.uk/treevolution-how-trees-came-first-and-rot-came-later-in-earths-deep-past/

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Correct. In theory, we could make more oil in the lab. We cannot make more coal, because the wood will get broken down by bacteria far before it turns to peat, lignite, sub-bituminous, or bituminous coal, and much less anthracite.

  • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m a billion years, crabs will start turning into trees and trees into crabs. merging into the ubercreature

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I imagine it’ll look like paras

      • multifariace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Paras is a fungus. Totally different thing.

        • Atlas_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ah you’re right. Torterra then

          • bpev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Torterra is a tortoise. Totally different thing.

            • DUMBASS@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Maybe Pantera?

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Pantera is large cats

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m a billion years

      Damn. You look good for your age.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’d argue, but I agree. I don’t need to know how they look, if they’re a billion years and capable of communicating, whatever state they’re in looks good. Even if its a fungus posessed rot monster.

        • ladicius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          Like a tree, for example.

          • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I wish, I’m only a crab, trying to become a tree

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      “ubercreature” excuse me, lichen would like a word with you

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        lichen is the shit

        • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          appreciate when a symbiote becomes it’s own thing.

          the tree of life isn’t meant to merge branches,

          Eukaryotes, corals, lychens, probably the same with chlorophyll.

    • VernetheJules [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      you may not like it but Ms Crabtree is what peak performance looks like

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 816 users / day
  • 5.23K users / week
  • 9.15K users / month
  • 22.1K users / 6 months
  • 98 local subscribers
  • 14.7K subscribers
  • 4.68K Posts
  • 120K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org