This randomly popped into my head from my childhood, I searched for it online, and apparently it’s not even that uncommon of a Christian take today.

  • vegeta1 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Its idolatry to protect the world created by your God. You need to desecrate and accelerate extinction event faster than even cyanobacteria. I’m starting to wonder if these fundies really worship God or fenrir and jorgumandr

  • semioticbreakdown [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    the contrarian in me wants to take up gaia worship because i think it’d be pretty wholesome actually. i think i could make a pretty good go of it with some modern cognitive science, a splash of new age babble, and a dab of whiteheadian panpsychism.

    but no i’ve never heard this specifically but i do remember hearing a lot about al gore

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Even when they’re saying stuff that’s mostly good we still get this shit

      homophobic papal garbage

      He observed that the world cannot be analysed by isolating one of its aspects, since “the book of nature is one and indivisible”, and includes the environment, life, sexuality, the family, social relations, and so forth. It follows that “the deterioration of nature is closely connected to the culture which shapes human coexistence”.

      papists go in The Apparatus imo

      • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        He observed that the world cannot be analysed by isolating one of its aspects, since “the book of nature is one and indivisible”, and includes the environment, life, sexuality, the family, social relations, and so forth. It follows that “the deterioration of nature is closely connected to the culture which shapes human coexistence”.

        That seems totally correct to me. Just not in the way they want it to be.

  • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    I didn’t grow up Christian but I haven’t heard that argument, that is just absurd to me. Aren’t we supposed to respect and have love for God’s creatures and the world made for us? How do they even arrive at that conclusion?

  • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I never heard that specifically, which is weird because I was surrounded by similar ideas, but the evangelical position was “God gave the earth to us and told us to multiply, so by not using our resources we would be spitting in god’s face” - this completely ignores the idea that god is supposed to have given us the earth and told us to take care of it, because he’s coming back in X many years, but hey nobody in this circle was known for their logic.

  • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Not specifically environmentalism as a whole but taking too much care, enacting those bad government regulations which hurt businesses, that type of thing. I suppose it’s because my parents had money issues so they adopted certain environmentalist stances because they were cheap. Don’t use too much of things because they cost money but that doesn’t sound great or make you feel good so they say oh for the environment, don’t use too much for the environment (but they’d burn down 10 acres of rain forest in a heartbeat to save $5).

    It was a personal responsibility issue and good Christians™ had a responsibility to be stewards BUT also because of the Genesis “dominion” clause it means we have a right and almost a duty to exploit nature, animals, etc as god has given them to us for our use and thus using them is not defiling them and this world is disposable anyways as god is going to rapture the faithful and destroy it any day now™ so it’s fine to trash it a bit because we’ll be moving onto some place better. So it was kind of mixed messaging but it came down to the EPA was bad, government was bad, man was given charge of this for a reason, yes some people were bad and irresponsible and good Christians™ had a duty to give at least a moment’s thought about the more egregious environmental crimes but could do most of them anyways especially if they saved money.

    That dominion clause does a lot of heavy lifting for a lot of garbage opinions but it’s a pretty strong clause so I wouldn’t say they’re stretching it on a textual basis just that the whole thing is way past its best by date and should have been discarded oh many centuries ago.

  • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sort of, more like vague allusions to environmentalism being “bad” because atheists and leftists were for it, and it was type of idolatry, but they never really got into the details of that one.

  • ...m...@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    …never heard that specifically but fourty years ago my parents ambushed me with their pastor telling me that i’d go to hell for becoming vegetarian; something about god creating animals for exploitation and to reject that was forsaking his will…

    …then they tackled me to the ground, pried my jaws open, and shoved chunks of chicken down my throat: nice people…

  • PurrLure [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Hoy boy you’re digging up some repressed childhood memories here.

    So like 25 years ago or so my old childhood Christian church that had a strong focus on missionary work decided to run a children’s play on how cool and good Christian missionaries are and how we should all grow up to be little missionaries in our own little ways. popuko-hammer

    But it wasn’t good enough to just focus on their own American version of colonialist Christianity during the play, no no no, they just had to made kids dress up in other religion’s fake sterotype outfits, go up to the stage in a line, and a light would fall individually on each kid as they read their memorized lines about how stupid everyone else’s religions are. They wanted every religion shown on stage to be as dumbed down and silly as possible, so I think either gaia worship or paganism was included with a shitty hippy costume. I wish I could remember the name of the play, because it wasn’t just something the pastor’s mom made up on the spot. Nah, it had a whole ass merch line, apparently this was a play our old church bought the rights to. I know this because my youth group got to go to a Christian convention shortly after and vendors were selling books, shirts, and paper advertising for it. If I remember right the advertising had like a fake precious memories art style mixed with 90’s world peace themed cheap looking clip art where everyone smiles and holds hands because Jesus loves them? If you’re a former American Christian maybe you know what I’m talking about, my memory is foggy.

    Anyways, now that I’m an adult and can look back just to laugh at this, if anyone could let me know what that church play was called that would be very poggers. I want to look up cursed youtube footage of it to make my partner cringe, ok thanks bye. agony-yehaw

  • veganbtw@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Woah no, this take is wild. I was taught environmentalism was halal and required by god lol