I see stories about how election is rigged or that there are security vulnerabilities and lots of people don’t believe the outcome. Why don’t they just open source everything so that anyone can look at the code and be sure the votes are tallied correctly?

  • neon_cat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are probably two reasons:

    1. It wouldn’t change how the public thinks about them. People wouldn’t understand how voting machines work, even if they were open source. Do you expect normal people to look at and understand code? Also people who have lost hope in democracy and want to believe that the election was a hoax will continue to do so anyway.

    2. It’s probably more comfortable for the manufacturers of those machines to keep them closed source. Why would they show the world how they work? That would disclose potential flaws which is bad for their reputation. And it would make it easier for competition to emerge.

    p.s. I agree that voting machines are bollocks.

    • dhdds@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. People will be mean at anything. There’s a fact.
      2. You can manufacture your eletronic urn with an Arduino or somethink alike