Jesus fucking Christ this post is about killing Hitler. The leader of the Nazi movement and head of the genocidal state.
Also this is ahistorical. Even at the height of fascism in Nazi Germany, in 1945 where the population had decreased and Nazi party membership was at its peak, 8 million people were members of the Nazi party and the total population in Germany was almost 70 million. Obviously it was possible to not be a member of the party. And this was after over a decade of indoctrination, youth programs, and mass murder on the part of Nazi party members from the top down to the rank and file. People did not have the freedom to identify as anything they wanted, but apart from those who had a literal or figurative gun held to their heads if they didn’t join, they didn’t have to be Nazis.
You have to draw the line when it comes to murder, on all sides, if you care about human life.
Yes, and if you care about human life you must draw the line somewhere after killing fascists. This is the obvious solution to the “paradox” of tolerance. If you want a society tolerant and safe for everyone possible, you must exclude those who make it intolerant and unsafe. And in this example, if you value human life, you must be willing to resist fascism by all means.
![[Cw: hitler getting a Nuremberg necktie] Absolute cinema. Edit: lib in the comments! Get'em before I ban'em](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/cf316ce1-e0d1-40c5-a200-9ebb40455d02.jpeg){kind=link}
OK so killing Nazi children and their parents is self-defense?
You realize many people in these social movements do not have the freedom to identify as anything they want?
You have to draw the line when it comes to murder, on all sides, if you care about human life.
Jesus fucking Christ this post is about killing Hitler. The leader of the Nazi movement and head of the genocidal state.
Also this is ahistorical. Even at the height of fascism in Nazi Germany, in 1945 where the population had decreased and Nazi party membership was at its peak, 8 million people were members of the Nazi party and the total population in Germany was almost 70 million. Obviously it was possible to not be a member of the party. And this was after over a decade of indoctrination, youth programs, and mass murder on the part of Nazi party members from the top down to the rank and file. People did not have the freedom to identify as anything they wanted, but apart from those who had a literal or figurative gun held to their heads if they didn’t join, they didn’t have to be Nazis.
Yes, and if you care about human life you must draw the line somewhere after killing fascists. This is the obvious solution to the “paradox” of tolerance. If you want a society tolerant and safe for everyone possible, you must exclude those who make it intolerant and unsafe. And in this example, if you value human life, you must be willing to resist fascism by all means.
Removed by mod