A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.


As is tradition, at around this time of year, we discuss the latest developments in the communist plan to destroy Christmas and everything festive and jolly - including that bastard kulak Santa Claus. Down with holly and myrrh, and up with historical materialism!

This year, I’m highlighting the economic trend of de-Decemberization, as the world struggles to break free from the seasonal hegemony imposed by the North Pole. Some regard it as a rather overhyped phenomenon, stating that the chains of Christmas are too frozen for any country to thaw and break in the current environment. Others are more optimistic, and assert that perhaps an alternative world holiday could be established to outright replace it, or maybe a series of smaller holiday traditions can bring it down like a pack of wolves bringing down a moose.

To return to seriousness, as this year draws to a close, I hope everybody here - yes, also you, the person reading this - has a 2026 that was better than 2025, and that the efforts of the United States and their proxies are foiled at every turn. One day, humans will live in a world free from empires, and it would be nice if as many of us as possible lived to see that world’s birth.

At the very least, I’d like to live to see an aircraft carrier sink beneath the waves.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    how’s the blockade going, son? https://archive.ph/ngZUt

    US Coast Guard lacks forces to seize Venezuela-linked tanker for now, sources say

    • Bella 1 tanker refuses Coast Guard boarding attempts
    • Potential boarding likely falls to elite Coast Guard unit
    • Coast Guard lacks resources for large-scale oil tanker seizures
    • Trump ordered blockade of sanctioned tankers near Venezuela
    more

    The U.S. Coast Guard is waiting for additional forces to arrive before potentially attempting to board and seize a Venezuela-linked oil tanker it has been pursuing since Sunday, a U.S. official and a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. The ship, which maritime groups have identified as the Bella 1, has refused to be boarded by the Coast Guard. That means that the task will likely fall to one of just two teams of specialists - known as Maritime Security Response Teams - who can board vessels under these circumstances, including by rappelling from helicopters. The days-long pursuit highlights the mismatch between the Trump administration’s desire to seize sanctioned oil tankers near Venezuela and the limited resources of the agency that is mainly carrying out operations, the Coast Guard.

    Unlike the U.S. Navy, the Coast Guard can carry out law enforcement actions, including boarding and seizing vessels that are under U.S. sanctions. Trump earlier this month ordered a “blockade” of all sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, in Washington’s latest move to increase pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. The Coast Guard has in recent weeks seized two oil tankers near Venezuela. After the first seizure, on Dec. 10, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi posted a 45-second video showing two helicopters approaching a vessel and armed individuals in camouflage rappelling onto it. A Saturday social media post by the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Coast Guard, showed what appeared to be Coast Guard officers aboard the Gerald Ford aircraft carrier getting ready to depart and seize the Centuries tanker, the second of the ships boarded by the U.S. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Coast Guard officials on the Ford were from a Maritime Security Response Team and at the time too far from Bella 1 to carry out a boarding operation. “There are limited teams who are trained for these types of boardings,” said Corey Ranslem, chief executive of maritime security group Dryad Global and previously with the U.S. Coast Guard.

    The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment and Reuters could not determine what, if any other reasons, have led to the Coast Guard not seizing the vessel yet. The administration could ultimately choose to not board and seize the vessel. The White House said that the United States was still in “active pursuit of a sanctioned dark fleet vessel that is part of Venezuela’s illegal sanctions evasion.”

    LIMITED RESOURCES

    The U.S. Coast Guard is a branch of the armed forces but a part of the Department of Homeland Security. The United States has assembled a massive military force in the Caribbean, including an aircraft carrier, fighter jets and other warships. Ospreys and additional MC-130J Commando II aircraft arrived in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico in recent days, according to a separate source. The Coast Guard has far fewer resources in place. The service has long said that it lacks the resources to effectively carry out a growing list of missions, including search and rescue operations and drug seizures. In November, the Coast Guard announced that it had seized about 49,000 pounds of drugs worth more than $362 million in the eastern Pacific. “The Coast Guard is in a severe readiness crisis that is decades in the making,” Admiral Kevin Lunday, who leads the Coast Guard, told lawmakers in June. For the fiscal year ending September 2026, the Coast Guard requested $14.6 billion in funding. It will receive an additional $25 billion through a sweeping spending and tax legislation, known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” “Our Coast Guard is less ready than in any other time in the past 80 years since the end of World War Two. The downward readiness spiral we are on is not sustainable,” Lunday said earlier this year.

    this whole thing feels like a joke, “limited resources”?! what’s the point of all these deployments if you still have “limited resources” in the end? like, sure, these fancy special-forces teams are indeed limited, but you’re telling me that the administration which has just been blatantly murdering civilians in random boats is now worried about doing things “the right way” with the proper teams who have legal authority as part of the Coast Guard instead of just, you know, sending in some Marines, who have boarding teams of their own? (but not necessarily the legal authority)

    is this some kind of stalling tactic since they’re actually not willing to really seize the tanker? what’s going on here puzzled

    • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      6 days ago

      The MIC and pentagon regularly feign incompetence or lack of strength to maximize wartime funding.

      War is a racket to these people and they need to milk it for all its worth given that the real climate change wars will start very soon.

    • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 days ago

      you’re telling me that the administration which has just been blatantly murdering civilians in random boats is now worried about doing things “the right way” with the proper teams who have legal authority as part of the Coast Guard instead of just, you know, sending in some Marines, who have boarding teams of their own? (but not necessarily the legal authority

      Manufacturing consent for sending Marines. Show they couldn’t do it the right way so they can do it with military units.

      • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        6 days ago

        Manufacturing consent for sending Marines

        Do they care about manufacturing consent at this point though? Again, this is coming on the heels of them already doing blatantly illegal strikes on boats - if it wasn’t for that, I would have been more amenable to the manufacturing consent angle. Or did pushback on the strikes actually rattle them and now they’re starting to attempt a better job of consent-manufacturing?

        • Are they manufacturing the consent for the libs to allow the military option (which they have proven they will do anyway) or are they escalating in a controlled manner to avoid spooking the shipping insurance industry?

          Insurance as a system is built on a LOT of risk, by definition, and the assumption that such risks won’t be claimed against. Seems like an area the US admin would be very careful in navigating, because if rates spike over some preventable gaffe they’re compounding it across their entire export-driven economic plan.

          This is, of course, against the common knowledge that the empire is driven by short term bullshit and nepotism masquerading as intellect.

          • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            avoid spooking the shipping insurance industry

            Hmm, interesting, I hadn’t considered that aspect of it thinkin-lenin

            I guess Trump, as a real estate guy (even if not necessarily a particularly competent one) might be more sensitive to insurance and other financial fuckery like this, and there’s plenty of other business ghouls he’s brought into the admin.

      • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        6 days ago

        I already see the libs getting mad because the incompetent Trump admin can’t hold the blockade and they will rush a $50 billion relief military funding bill to “get it done”.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      With this tanker, it has no crude oil onboard, it’s sailing empty and the tanker is effectively a stateless vessel. This gives the US the unique opportunity to seize the tanker “legally”. But for it to be of any use, it must be captured undamaged. The way this was done so far is via helicopter raids, but this requires compliance from the tanker, to slow down enough to make it safe for helicopters to hover, and special forces to rappel down and commandeer the vessel. If the tanker keeps it’s speed up, even a very modest 10 knots, it makes helicopter led operations difficult. There are of course a bunch of things the US could do to slow down or stop the tanker, but that would either damage the vessel or lead to casualties amongst the crew and US forces (helicopter rappel gone wrong onto moving vessel), not things that the US wants for now.

      Saying that the coast guard is doing the seizing of tankers is mainly a formality. In all the seizures so far, helicopters have been dispatched from the USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier, with special forces elements onboard, accompanied by some coast guard units. I don’t think that the Coast Guard operates aircraft carriers…