A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of the three leaders of the constitutive states of the Alliance of Sahel States (Mali’s Assimi Goïta, Niger’s Abdourahamane Tchiani, and Burkina Faso’s Ibrahim Traoré) marching together in Bamako, Mali.


At the start of last week concluded the Summit of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES in French), in which, among other significant news, was the announcement of the creation of a unified military force for the alliance - called, rather straightforwardly, the Unified Force - which currently consists of about 5000 soldiers. Strictly speaking, joint military operations between the three countries had already been taking place for over a year before this point, but I imagine this organization streamlines the internal processes and makes it truly official.

Mali’s Goïta delivered a speech during the summit in which he stated there were three main threats to the alliance: military, economic, and media. While this new military force is a major effort to combat military threats, the three countries have also mutually launched television, radio, and print media organizations to combat disinformation and psychological warfare. The economic aspect is the most tricky aspect of all, as (albeit decaying) American hegemony is not friendly to states which seek an independent economic path, most especially if that path does not directly benefit Western international corporations. Nonetheless, the three countries are doing what they can; they mutually launched an AES passport earlier in 2025, and this month, Mali has taken a bold move, recovering $1.2 billion after renegotiating mining deals with mining corporations after a comprehensive audit. Gold mining in Mali is a major sector of the economy, comprising about 20% of annual government revenue.

The three countries have also withdrawn from ECOWAS. The remaining countries consist of a small collection of West African countries, most significantly among them Nigeria and Côte d’Ivoire. ECOWAS is increasingly seen by the AES leadership - quite rightfully - as an organization which seeks to contain the radical shift in West Africa and return the region to the neocolonial French-governed status quo. As I talked about in a semi-recent news megathread, Nigeria is experiencing its own suite of internal problems, so perhaps in the coming years, ECOWAS will crumble from within and the AES can push back the terrorist organizations threatening them.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


    • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      Doing this shit to Colombia is real accelerationist hours. Whatever about Venezuela, but if Trump kidnaps Petro then Brazil is getting nukes. They already had a nuclear program, and still retain a lot of that knowledge and infrastructure.

      • sempersigh [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        There’s US troops/assets on the ground throughout Colombia and a big ass US Embassy in Bogata. This leaves numerous targets for retaliation unlike in Venezuela so I’m not sure how this is going to work?

        Maybe he’ll target ELN or FARC dissidents but it sounds like he wants a direct attack on the Colombian government which tbh I straight up don’t think is going to happen because if it does what the fuck that’s actually really dumb; personnel/assets would need to be removed from the country before any of this happens.

        • ColombianLenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 days ago

          Attacking ELN or FARC would be dumb considering that would actually help the state lol.

          Either way I agree with you, the US has a large presence in Colombia and I think an attack in the country will have gringo residents and tourists getting killed in the cities. That would be a new escalation ladder, but it is a possibility.

          spoiler

          Also FFS its ColOmbia

      • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        They already had a nuclear program, and still retain a lot of that knowledge and infrastructure.

        This is true, same for Argentina, unfortunely neoliberaism and captain incest probably destroyed all of that.

        The Brazilian army (like the Argentine Army with Patagonia) really thinks that the US is planning to occupy VZ or Guyana so they can invade and colonize the Amazon Rainforest. If they attack Colombia or Brazilian territory I can see Brazil going on full alert.

      • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Can Brazil afford this though? They spend 1% of GDP on the military and GDP per capita only recently went above $10 000, with it being around 6000-7000 previously. Pakistan spent between 7-10% of GDP on the military for decades to develop nuclear weapons, delivery systems, etc, from the 70s to the late 90s, after which military spending as a share of GDP sharply declined. Even if Brazil only needs to spend half of that in terms of a % of GDP, that’s still tripling quadrupling the military budget for over a decade. (This will be extremely unpopular). A proper nuclear deterrent is extraordinarily expensive and would take a long time to actually develop everything needed, even if building off of existing technologies from previous experience, you still need to test missiles, warhead designs, etc.

        • I_Hate_AmeriKKKa [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          (This will be extremely unpopular)

          even assuming your numbers are 100% correct, if the US shows that venezuela isnt just a one off and they’re willing to do it to anyone in the americas are you really so sure it would remain that unpopular?

        • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          I imagine they could get missile and warhead designs from Russia rather easily, given their history and BRICS. Still enormously expensive, but Brazil can’t be sanctioned and economically isolated like Pakistan was. And Brazil was ruled by a military dictatorship like Pakistan for many years, even if it was unpopular if the Brazilian military decides to get nukes they’re gonna do it regardless.

    • ColombianLenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      He’s been saying that Mexico, Greenland, and Colombia are all next. Probably misdirection about which is the real next target.

      Either way, pick your poison, you will fail, you sack of shit.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Colombia has elections coming up this year, so I think the US will try influence those. If the candidate from Petro’s party wins though and is not complaint with the United States, then US military operations are a more serious threat.