Context: He’s in the files

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    People have been getting taller over time. Hawking didn’t book a big enough venue.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    the reason we don’t have time travelers is that the past is no more concrete than the future. [Current science disagrees with the idea that] just like there are infinite potential futures, there are an infinity of potential pasts that could have evolved into the present [instead insisting that the entire past is fully embedded in the present]. [It’s not supported by any current theories that] the probability of reaching a particular past is essentially zero.

  • draco_aeneus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel? I’d much rather go look at dinosaurs, or visit the construction of the pyramids, or go listen to Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech.

    Even if my goal was to meet a single scientist, I think I’d personally pick any other. Pliny the Elder, Marie Curie, Albert Einstein…

    Not to be rude to Mr. Hawking (well, maybe he deserves it, I don’t know what got him in to the Epstein files…), but a thorougly average party is simply not likely to attract very many time travellers.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel?

      Not only that, apparently the machine he used to speak was rather difficult to use quickly, and drafting responses could take hours or days depending on how much needed said. Pretty much all of his appearances after he was unable to use his voice were heavily scripted ahead of time.

      So unless you’re visiting Steven Hawking when he still could talk, it’d be pretty boring as you couldn’t have a proper back-and-forth conversation

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think his party would attract at least a few curiosity seekers.

      On the other hand, it would likely include time travellers from various future eras, perhaps hundreds, or even thousands of years apart. Future time travel would have to be heavily regulated, to keep unauthorized people from screwing up the time line. So perhaps future time travellers are expressly forbidden from having contact with other time travellers, making Hawking’s party the one place that time travellers are NOT allowed to visit.

  • WonderRin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Honestly, even if time travel were theoretically possible to be invented, there’s also a high chance that we’re just going to destroy ourselves before we get to that point anyway.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also, what if it uses a lot of resources and potential time travelers didn’t want to waste them to go to parties (thus further progressing your hypothetical conundrum)?

  • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have thoughts.

    It was ridiculous that Hawking thought a time traveler would make it to his party for several reasons. There are a few models of time travel, and only one of them has an internal logic that allows for traveling without paradoxical consequences; multiversal divergence.

    Our version of the time traveler party was one of an infinite amount of time traveler parties that hawking hosted throughout the multiverse. A time traveler would be traveling to that time like picking a grain of sand on a beach, where each grain of sand is a near identical party to the last.

    As our version of the party diverges from the realities with time travelers who chose to travel to the hawking party, there would be a diminishing set of infinities containing time travelers that were attempting the journey.

    Thus while the chances of a time traveler going to the party are 100%, the party being our version of the party approach 0 infinitely fast.

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hawking knew no one was going to show up. It was done as a sort of proof against it. He just thought it was more likely then the existence of god.

    • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      You’re missing the point completely.

      You do not actually know if “paradoxical consequences” are a thing. Logic might, like everything we believe right now, turn out not to be how the world works.

      Stopping yourself from doing an experiment because “current knowledge makes it seem impossible” is how science never advances.

      • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I have no idea what you’re arguing against, or what point you think I’ve missed.

        Have you assumed that I have discounted other models because of the model I chose for my comment? Bah! You assume too much.

        I did not state that doing the experiment was a bad thing; my comment was in humor even!

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You can spend your entire life thinking about it and you Will never reach a definitive answer. Or, you can spend a day to set up an experiment and throw a party.

  • RustyShackleford@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Now, I’m speaking hypothetically, legally, and for educational purposes only… you fast-forward a few decades and suddenly certain names appear in court documents and flight logs, not convictions, not proof of wrongdoing, just… associations. Enough to make a careful chrononaut say, ‘You know what? I’m not popping back in time to shake hands and eat shrimp.’

    The absence at that party wasn’t evidence that time travel failed. It was evidence that it worked, and everyone who could come already knew how the story looked later.

    History doesn’t just judge actions. It judges proximity. And no self-respecting time traveler shows up early to something that turns awkward in hindsight.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      More pragmatically, time travel for a casual party would be risky because you’re carrying germs many generations apart. Time travelers would wear full-body suits or risk dramatically altering history. They could not drink or eat anything.

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The issue for me is that, let’s say that one day a magical device does allow time travel, it would also have to do teleportation relative to some point since everything is in motion. What would all of time and space use for a relative location? Can’t be the earth or sun since those are moving. Even our galactic cluster is moving. So if you went back in time a year, the earth wouldn’t be at the same point in space even though it’s done a full revolution. I’m no space scientist but I don’t imagine we have a solution.

      • DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        May I introduce you to the concept of time travel in the time machine, where you are in a gravitationally bound dimensional pocket

      • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Uh, why can’t it be relative to the Earth’s surface? We’re already trapped in that gravity well after all, we don’t drift off it because of normal time travel in real time.

    • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Okay yes but there’s also a bit of dissonance, if I learned that Vlad the impaler had a time travel party to prove it and I had the capability to do so, I wouldn’t give a shit, would go see him and also take a gun just to keep myself safe. Safe. But it’s somebody from hundreds of years ago, why do I care about any of that?

      Sure. This statement seems harsh but I’m playing devil’s advocate here, the further you get away from the situation, the less it really matters

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Is it because our solar system is hurdling through space at over 1.5 million miles per hour, so anyone who time travels will find themselves alone in an empty void?

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      There’s no universal frame of reference. Any theoretical time travel would likely need a beacon of some sort to calibrate their arrival point, meaning you couldn’t travel back beyond the point time travel was established.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You can easily cross calculate between various, inertial frames of reference. The problem is that earth isn’t sitting still in an inertial frame. We spin around the sun, and we orbit the center of our galaxy. We also get nudged about by the pull of other stars.

        Tracking a time jump (or technically a time-space jump) would be easy, if you just wanted to be within the solar system. With measurements the earth-moon gap would not be too hard. Hitting a surface exactly would be another story. Miss by a meter and your cut in half by a wall or floor.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You know what they say: the best time to build a time machine is 50 years ago.

        I think that’s basically the movie Primer too, they’d turn the machine on, go hide in an apartment for X amount of time, then go back to the machine and emerge 5 minutes after they turned it on and just walked away.

        But gravity effects time, sticking close to a planet isn’t going to be hard.

        Ironically enough the first (if we ever get them) time machines are going to be a hell of a lot like modern “UFOs” are described. You couldn’t risk landing on the planet, elevation changes are what’s really a nightmare to account for. Show up and hour early and everything is a foot higher because of how fast we’re spinning.

        So you’d want a space craft, because space is big and empty. And realistically it’s going to take something bigger than a telephone booth or even the 1980s embodiment of Florida on four wheels with a hood designed to do cocaine off of to house a time machine.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Show up and hour early and everything is a foot higher because of how fast we’re spinning.

          Any actual process for doing it would probably be continuous in some way. Even if it’s just the machine making that part of the trip. Just leaving existence at some time and arriving at a different one doesn’t make a lot of sense.

          So, just more reason to do it in space.

          • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Imagine your time machine has spiders at the time of your arrival, because it had a small defect that grew into an opening after several years.

            “Ha ha, I can’t see anything, but it seems like time travel tickles”

          • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            thermogoddamics

            Bless you for furthering this meme

            Arbeit macht Frei… but also, Arbeit is the energy transfer that occurs when a force is applied to move an object over a distance

          • UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            So if I was going to correct you by referencing the thermodynamic law that forbids “never stopping” but upon further inspection determined that was the joke in the first place, does that mean I have created an example of the zeroth law?

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ve seen this take a lot it feels like and it boggles the mind why. If someone figures out time travel they ipso facto will have figured out the space travel as well.

      If you can travel through time you can travel through space.

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      That logic assumes that there is some universal way if measuring the position of the Earth, but there is no absolute system for measuring position in space. Location, distance, velocity, and even simultaneity depend entirely on the choice of a frame of reference. And the frame in which the earth is stationary is no less valid than any other.

      Also the type of time machine has a bearing here. The traditional H.G. Wells vehicle-type doesn’t jump, but moves smoothlythrough all the intervening moments in time, so there’s no reason it wouldn’t stay firmly on the surface. And a time portal that forms a connection to the same apparatus at a different time would have no problem either, since the machine itself doesn’t move except in the ordinary way.

      • ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        If i had a vaccume and a carbon nanotube rotating such that the ends are moving at the speed of light, and another going the opposite direction (no net rotational inertia outside the device), I would have a dimensional anchor as moving it would cause spacetime to exceed the speed limit.

        Voila, I just created a sci-fi plot device

        • counterfactual@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Read The Billiard Ball by Asimov to understand why a gravitationally “locked” device would not work.

          You lose the frame of reference to the astral bodies around it, therefore it stays in place as the Earth and everything else simply move past it. Essentially useless as an anchor.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There is also the idea that time machines work like telephones. You need to have a receiving end made first before you can call it.

    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Half this comment thread legitimately knows how they work

      The other half is speculation

      The truth is in the middle, Lemmy people are pretty well versed in science fiction and science :>

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Using “Knows how they work” while talking about goddamn time machines cracks me up every time.

        It’s like you’re confidently arguing that the inside of a black hole is another universe where time runs backwards and dogs meow ;)

        (For tonal clarity I’m not taking the piss, it’s just funny when folk get really into a scifi topic and get all fanfiction about it)

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Listen, dude: I’ve got a lot more concerts in my list before I get to your lame-ass party.

    Would you have missed Metallica in Moscow for some party you assumed nobody would attend? Fuck no.

    Now if you’ll excuse me I’m gonna go sell all your grandmothers some really strong modern weed to get into Hendrix, New Year’s Eve, 1969.

    Can’t wait to hear Machine Gun live.

    • BillyClark@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      17 hours ago

      lame-ass party

      Since the time traveler would be from the future, he’d have already known that nobody went to the party.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Would you have missed Metallica in Moscow for some party you assumed nobody would attend? Fuck no.

      Let’s see… the egotistical pricks that sued anyone that wanted to like them… in an authoritarian shithole… or hanging out with Stephen Hawking…

      Tough choice. Can I convince Lars to sleep in the disaster bed? Or help them with arrangements so that songs that have about 1 minute of interesting music don’t have 8 minutes worth of filler?

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        This was a million and a half people vibing so hard they broke their government. I’m not missing it no matter how much of an asshole Lars Ulrich is.

    • themoken@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      My God… Is the fact that boomers think '60s weed was mind altering proof of time incursions from the dank future???

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You can’t bring the time travel souvenir back with you in the time machine. You’ve got to store it in a safe cave or storage unit or something so that it’ll be at least plausibly aged by the time it reaches the future, even if surprisingly well-preserved.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No need to assume. You already know nobody attended. And you can also be part of the joke if it’s one.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Wasn’t it already a known fact? I swear I’ve read about it already like 5 years ago, and I’m not a time traveler.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 hours ago

      He wasn’t known for being a great guy, just a really smart guy.

      The name of the late Cambridge physicist was included in a 2015 email in which Epstein told Maxwell to offer a reward to any of Giuffre’s “friends acquaitonts [sic] family” who could prove false an allegation that Hawking had participated in an “underage orgy” in the Virgin Islands. Hawking, who died in 2018, has not been accused of a crime related to Epstein.