Considering all the recent attention surrounding Noam Chomsky and his connections to Jeffery Epstein, I thought I might ask this question.

I personally think Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a good book and makes a lot of good points regarding the bourgeois media which few other left-wing authors have made, at least not in such a concise and easily-explained way. When I shared this book with new leftists, they seem to appreciate and comprehend its contents rather quickly. The only part which I found myself majorly disagreeing with was the conclusion in which Chomsky suggests that “American democracy” is “under threat,” as opposed to being non-existent in the first place.

With that being said, I consider Chomsky’s work to be a pearl in an ocean of bad takes. I think that Chomsky, particularly recently, is an anti-communist propagandist and apologist for the bourgeois system, basically a left-liberal.

Is my take incorrect?

Edit: I failed to mention how this book was co-authored by someone else who is not on the Epstein files. Thank you to all those who mentioned that.

  • QuillcrestFalconer [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Manufacturing Consent fail to address the class dynamics of post-internet journalism. From 2000 onward, access is not that relevant.

    ??? Book was published in 1988 though.

    I mean you’re not wrong but the book was written before the Internet became relevant

    • micnd90 [he/him,any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      My point was that the book is relevant as a piece of history if you want to understand US media landscape at the time, but now it is outdated.