• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I do believe gorilla piss exists.

    I do not believe drinking gorilla piss would grant you gorilla strength (citation needed).

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        well you eyedrop it into your butthole and then expose your butthole to the sun so the positive solar energy modifies it primally because we’re all made of starlight and that’s just how it works

    • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      No, no, no, no. You have to sacrifice a goat by dropping it into a volcano and make sure to drink the piss while the goat is still falling. It works, trust me.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They also seem to believe wi-fi “powers everything”? What a loon.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “It’s funny how people will believe in Newton’s laws of motion but still think the Force from Star Wars is mythical nonsense.”

  • U7826391786239@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    if someone is trying to “convert” you to esoteric/occult beliefs, then that person has no idea what they’re talking about

    • TheFriendlyDickhead@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I peraonally belief in a really thin cable, but big tech is trying to tell us its waves and stuff. But you have your opinion, I have mine. Nobody can be sure wich one is really true.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        i don’t believe in wifi, just like i don’t believe in trees. i know they’re there. that requires no belief.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The belief would be that your senses aren’t being actively deceived. Also, that you’re not a Boltzmann brain hallucinating in the void.

          I personally believe all the axioms of science apply. It’s still fun to poke at them.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            the atheist says “i will not believe”. the agnostic says “i can not believe”. one is as dogmatic as the beliefs they purport to refute, the other lacks the capacity for dogma, as belief for them is simply not possible.

            • cynar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              36 minutes ago

              Belief in a null is a lot more reasonable than belief in something so powerful it can pretend to be a null.

              Belief that I am not in a Truman show like environment is a lot more reasonable (without evidence) than belief that I am in a Truman show, and they are doing a perfect job.

              That doesn’t mean I don’t try disproving the null hypothesis.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Oh, you’re a solipsist? You believe reality is an illusion and trees don’t really exist? I’m somewhat similar, I’m an antirealist. I recognise that reality is an illusion, but I still choose to believe in it until it can be overthrown. If we teach enough people how to reshape their beliefs and perceptions, then we can decide for ourselves whether trees exist. But at present, I need to believe in trees in order to inhabit consensus reality and communicate efficiently with the people who live here. It’s cool that you don’t believe in trees, though!

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I only saw the top part of the picture at first, and I was very confused: “Why is this in Science Memes?”

  • tetris11@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I do subscribe to a small comfort belief that our consciousness isn’t just encoded in our neurons but has a radiative component that constructively/destructively interferes with the environment on some small level we atttibute to random events, and that when we die, we sever only the somatic component of our consciousness but our radiative part lives on encoded into a wider network of ambient thought.

    Sort of like ghosts/an afterlife, but less moaning and chain rattling and more general vibing the emotion of a park bench from the overlapped thought networks that ever intersected it

    Might be in the wrong sub…

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think consciousness is more than just our neurons, it’s an active waveform riding and guided by them.

      Unfortunately, I don’t think it survives death. Without the underlying structure, it collapses to noise.

      Interestingly, our brains have special circuits, design to emulate others. In effect, our consciousness imprints onto theirs. It’s not the full pattern, and imperfect, but a part of us lives on in the consciousness of everyone who knows us.

      Like ripples in a pond. The water of the initial wave is no longer involved, but it has passed to others.

  • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    World appears to be solid/stable at first but on closer inspection is actually vibratory.

    It’s ok to have points of agreement. You don’t have to mock and bicker 100% of the time.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      People who believe in “auras” and actually think that thinking good thoughts in relation to a specific thing will affect it on any way are deserving of mockery.

      It’s religion for people who don’t like organized religion.

      • Dream@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        You’re changing the subject to auras and telekinesis: not what was being discussed.

        What will the mockery get for you?