Maybe this is too fedposty (and let me know if it is), but I’ve been thinking about this a lot, especially with how things are going in Iran. It seems like modern warfare is basically just “my drones strike your drones”, and if either side has drones free to not strike other drones, they can instantly kill whoever they like. With this in mind, is it even really possible for a revolution in the US to escalate into a civil war without simply being air-superiority’d into oblivion with modern sensors? Is guerilla war viable anymore? The main counterpoint I can think of to this possibility is that the US military is A: incompetent and B: mostly a colonial garrison force, but I don’t know.
(And yeah, I know a revolution in the US would have a whole laundry list of prerequisites and is significantly hindered by the fact it can’t be tied with anti-imperial nationalism. I’m talking strictly in terms of if it actually happened.)


As you astutely pointed out, the prerequisites for revolution have to be realized before a real revolution kicks off, and these takes I made a few years ago are what I believe the prevailing conditions will look like when revolution becomes possible in the United States
I believe revolution in the United States will acquire a balkanized nature with the military situation being defined for both sides by defeat or victory in detail, there will be states where the left wins utterly and states where it is crushed completely, but the defeats and victories won’t be confined by state borders, which are largely irrelevant, but by the economic and demographic character of whole regions
I think the East Coast is likely to go full socialist. The working populations of Philly, New York, Baltimore, Boston etc know what’s up.