• Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had a similar conversation about a scene in some teen vampire show where a new vampire can’t get into his apartment because he lives alone. My argument was that a lease is pretty explicitly an invitation to enter a place, so the entire metaphysics of the show is fucked. If there’s one thing vampire rules should account for it’s a let of property by a lord.

  • astutemural@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    The imaginary entity known as ‘the state’ cannot give permission to someone to enter your house.

    What they can do is authorize state-sponsored violence to enter anyway.

    If vampires are bound by invitation, a warrant would be useless.

    • Posadas [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      But if property rights are a construct of the state, and a judge is acting as a representative of the state, wouldn’t the warent serve as permission from the progenitor of the property?

      • BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Only if you consider the state as legitimate. Depending on the story it’s also not that they must have an invitation from the owner of whatever dwelling they wish to enter, but the invitation of anyone residing within.

      • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its personal property rights. The vampire must ask the tenant not the landlord to be invited into the apartment.

        That or it could be as simple as any human on the other side of the threshold. Traditionally vampires or sort of autistic. Throw beans at them and they must stop to pick up each one.

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        But if property rights are a construct of the state, and a judge is acting as a representative of the state, wouldn’t the warent serve as permission from the progenitor of the property?

        I think it just comes down to which you think came first. If your version of vampires emerged after the creation of states (say, they were like Roman or something) then their rules would likely respect the authority of the state due to someone’s willing participation in its authority.

        If your version of vampires are pre-historical, then no. The state is a construct that has no bearing on individuals.

        • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The Vampire Diaries universe does follow the authority of the state and they play around with it in fun ways. Like they’ll transfer the deed to a property to someone else to reset who’s allowed to enter the house. I have a hazy memory that one time someone had a house foreclosed on so they’d be able to enter. I’m not sure about warrants though.

            • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think so too. Also notably to your first comment, in the vampire diaries universe the first generation of vampires were in like the 10th century, so some concept of a state, property rights, and the ability of the state to take away property rights did exist.

          • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Every time I hear someone talk about Vampire Diaries lore I get closer to watching it despite the CW ness, I love a show that plays with the details of its lore like that.

            • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I highly recommend The Originals, it’s one of the spinoff shows and follows the 3 first generation vampires in New Orleans and is a bit more serious and adult than TVD or the other spinoff. It’s the only one I’ve actually watched all the way through.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If they ask for permission from some random on the street and they say yes that’s counts? What in the law of vampiredom decides who can gives permission? If is the owner of said house, only the landlord can gives the permission?

  • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think magic operates on storytelling logic, not legal logic, so the Vampire would have to get permission even if they were the landlord because it’s “your” house.

    • OgdenTO [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Your house or your home? It feels right that it would be based on occupancy rather than ownership. What if someone was staying with you and you gave them a room in a shared house - the vampire could potentially get into the main house but then not enter that particular room?

      • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think that’s the correct distinction. They need an invitation into the home. A house is a dead object void of humanity, a home isn’t. A house can either be uninhabited or inhabited, but a home is only ever inhabited. Even though the landlord owns the property and it’s house, it isn’t their home.

      • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s mediated through societal convention like how a man cave or the garage “belongs” to the husband even though ownership of those two room is actually determined by who owns the deed of the house in which the rooms are located in. A cool edge case would be if the vampire gets invitation from the husband but the husband and wife immediately have a big fight afterwards, perhaps over inviting a vampire over, and agreed to divorce with the husband and wife doing the thing long-term couples that break up do of partitioning their home and sleeping in their own partition (ie the man sleeping on the couch). Does the vampire still has have access to the whole house or are they now restricted to just the husband’s partition of the house?

  • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Explicitly no, because what a search warrant actually does is say that the police do not need your permission to enter. If they didn’t have a warrant they could ask you to let them in so they could skip the paperwork and if you voluntarily allow them in anything they find can be used as evidence even without the warrant.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If a vampire cop can enter with a warrant, then a vampire count would be able to enter any residence in their county, right? Pretty sure that’s not how that works.

    What happens if a vampire declares a microstate that includes your house? What’s to stop any vampire from declaring themselves emperor of the world and disregarding the rule entirely?

    Iirc there’s a scene in the original Dracula book where Renfield invites him in while a patient at an asylum, where he didn’t have ownership or legal authority.

    Has to be “of the household” by Dracula rules.

    • BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Bram stokers Dracula is such a fun read. Starts out with the worlds most oblivious Englishman, ends with a party consisting of a mad doctor in charge of an insane asylum, a gun toting Yankee, a Dutchman wrapped in garlic, a power couple and I think one guy more?

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think this could be mostly resolved if you start with a much simpler case. If I have guests over and one of them answers the door, can they let a vampire in?

    My understanding of normal vampire lore is that yes, they could, because it’s not a question of ownership or any human idea of authority beyond just a person inside saying they can also come inside. Therefore, the vampire is not able to enter even with a warrant unless you let it in yourself.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think vampires have to be invited, and even if a cop has a warrant I’m not inviting them into my house. They’ll have to bust the door down.

  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Do you not see vampires when you use mirror camera, but do see them in dslr? Isn’t this like discrimination of vintage mirror camera users, I think vampire community should seriously consider this and post psa for photo enthusiasts

    • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      As long as it doesn’t have silver in it. They aren’t visible in mirrors because mirrors are traditionally made of silver

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        finally, i can use ye olde tin mirror for something (but isn’t large portion of cheap mirrors actually aluminium anyway?)

    • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      DSLR is a mirror camera, the R is for the reflex mirror that means the light in the viewfinder is the same axis of light that hits the sensor, you might mean mirrorless instead of DSLR?

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        ah yes i’ve tried to remember the name of the thingy without swingout mirror, thought they became standard and still called dslr

  • BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Two possible answers:

    • No, because they have to be invited in. Having a paper from someone outside the house is not the same as being invited in. Otherwise they could also just go to any rando and give them 10$ if the rando says the vampire is allowed in your home.

    • Possibly yes, if you perceive the court as legitimate and you would normally consider a cop with a warrant to be “invited” in your home. Sort of like how an atheist vampire won’t get burned by the cross, an anarchist or a sovereign citizen would be free from the vampire-cop warrant-menace. This would also depend on what the warrant stated (if it merely says they don’t have to ask for permission, then that won’t work, it must say they are allowed in) and what type of vampire we are dealing with.