The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an unabashed liberal and Dem party voter: enough is enough. Let the future get started already.

            • transmatrix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Socialism has a definition, not sure why I’d need to provide one. In general, I feel the government should serve the interests of the people. I support things like welfare for all, basic income, guaranteed housing, etc.

              • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I ask because you seem to have a very different definition of what socialism is from me because everything you’re describing is just social welfare. For example, I an Anarchist (syndicalist, if you want to get technical), could be considered a ‘socialist’ as my ideology would have governance under a federation of industrial unions. No president, no electroeal college, no leaderism. I ask again, what do you consider “socialism” to be?

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That sounds like it would end up being a plutocracy within the first generation. Unions are great for workers, but they aren’t a magical solution for government.

                  • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Industrial Unions aren’t the same as trade unions. I’d recommend looking into the IWW as (pretty much the only) example of this.

          • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess it is a bit of a loaded question, but it was done with the intent of just finding out what they define their ideology as.

            • BigNote@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s precisely my point. It’s a question that was asked in the furtherance of a specific and very obvious regime of intent. In that sense it was the epitome of intellectual dishonesty.