Can anyone tell this meme is true or false? I don’t have Gspy so I cannot test this

  • Lunar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    never in my life have i ever said “hey” anything to my phone and i intend to keep it that way

  • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s true for hardware that has dedicated low-power keyword detection hardware. I know my Pixel 1 had this behaviour. Haven’t tested it on my current phone since I actually have it enabled…

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The meme makes it sound like they turn off the server transmit feature. Though I also could believe this meme being false as well. “Ok Google” detection runs locally on the device as training a model to detect that and only that accurately without a server is easy to do and costs a lot less than having every device continuously transmitting the microphone. So it’s possible mute just disables transmission to the Internet rather than the mic.

    • AuroraShine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Peace be with you 🌹. I could really feel that this sentence came straight from the heart 😂😂. Jokes aside, same here✋🏻😐. I hate them too.

          • 520@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            So, there are unsupported builds of Lineage for the phone. Can definitely understand why you wouldn’t want to try that though.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The problem with Samsung (last time I checked at least) is that the moment you unlock the bootloader (which is needed to install anything other than stock), there’s a flag raised voiding the warranty. That flag from what I know is acting like a hardware fuse, so it’s pretty much non-reversible. Shame, really, because Samsung do have some really nice things in terms of hardware.

            • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well, It’s also a quite old phone. I was never one to replace something just because newer version is available.

              • kamen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Yeah, but if it’s new, you either put up with the stock firmware, or unlock it right away, giving up the 1 or 2 years of warranty (depending on the region).

    • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I know this won’t be a popular answer, but with my distaste for google, my switch to linux, the rumored google search revamp later this month turning it completely to AI and THIS? I’m going to go to iOS I believe

      • kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Company A enshittifies

        Options:

        1. Go to company B and trust them not to enshittify
        2. Embrace open source (for example GrapheneOS)

        The choice is clear for me.

        (btw you can run all android apps on OS built on the android open source project like GrapheneOS or LineageOS. Banking apps also work perfectly on GrapheneOS, don’t know about LineageOS, not using it)

        • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Have you not seen that google is apparently going to limit the ability for grapheneos?

          By YOUR metric #2 IS #1. If you go to grapheneOS, you are trusting that one they won’t enshitify and two that google won’t absolutely wreck the ability to continue.

          lineageos is still based on androids kernel. It still has connectivity to google applications.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The choice is clear for me.

          (btw you can run all android apps on OS built on the android open source project like GrapheneOS or LineageOS. Banking apps also work perfectly on GrapheneOS, don’t know about LineageOS, not using it)

          Not entirely clear unfortunately. #2 requires google to continue to allow APKs to just work on the open OS’s. If they decide to require google signed OS components and/or encrypt the APKs, we’ll be at the mercy of the individual developers to continue to compile for FOSS. Banks will be far less likely to release ‘less secure’ versions of their apps to run on ‘aleternative operating systems’

          For now, 2 is a good answer, but looking toward the future, stuff is looking a bit bleak. It’ll be a slow downward slide into obsolescence if we can’t keep the developers interested in FOSS support and if they’re no money in it for them, we’ll always end up with the shit end of the stick.

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If you think google is problematic in terms of either control or spying I got serious news for you little buddy.

        Just get a Pine Phone or similar linux-based device.

        • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If you are implying iOS is anywhere near the control and spyware of google, you don’t know tech at all.

          • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Apple was the first company to start using AI to scan cloud storage and later iOS devices themselves ‘for CSEM.’

            • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              and they are the only OS widely available that isn’t incorporating AI baked into every app so far as android 17 going to allow gemini to control your phone for you and read anything on your device.

              • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                …Siri has been around longer than all google AI integrations and has had phone control features since the iphone 8.

                • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  That comment alone tells me you don’t know what you are talking about.

                  Siri, to this day is a voicd-command assistant.

                  Read this part slower:

                  Google is actively developing “screen automation” so Gemini can order food or book rides in apps without you touching the phone. Android 17 is being framed as an “intelligence system” where the assistant does real tasks on your behalf.

                  You are saying Siri has done that since iOS8? How old are you? was iOS 8 like the oldesr you can think of?

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            We’re not implying it, it’s ready fact. That walled garden is more secure against the outside, but you are completely a product to them that gets sold and you’re at the mercy of their appstore. Your data is not securely deleted from their cloud, tons of reports of data deleted years ago coming back, multiple attempts of them to auto-delete offending pictures from your roll with AI and the service being extremely overzealous.

            • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              All that did is further my point.

              we don’t know what apple does with it, we DO however know exactly what google has done and is doing with it. It’s not just them either, its preinstalled apps on flagship devices. iOS doesn’t have hidden meta files on your phone, and as you said, it is more secure.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                we don’t know what apple does with it

                So go put your social security number on a billboard, you don’t know what people will do with it.

                it only furthers your point if you’re sticking your fingers in your ears and going annanananananananananana

                • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  From Google themselves

                  "We want you to understand the types of information we collect as you use our services

                  We collect information to provide better services to all our users — from figuring out basic stuff like which language you speak, to more complex things like which ads you’ll find most useful, the people who matter most to you online, or which YouTube videos you might like. The information Google collects, and how that information is used, depends on how you use our services and how you manage your privacy controls.

                  Google also collects and uses data that is not associated with your account. For example, when you’re not signed in to a Google Account, we store the information we collect with unique identifiers tied to the browser, application, or device you’re using. This allows us to do things like maintain your preferences across browsing sessions, such as your preferred language or whether to show you more relevant search results or ads based on your activity.

                  When you’re signed in, we also collect information that we store with your Google Account, which we treat as personal information."

                  source : https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en-US#intro


                  from Apple themselves

                  "Personal Data Use for Personalized User Experiences

                  Unlike other gatekeepers, Apple does not use algorithms or profiling to make any decision that would significantly affect its users without the opportunity for human review. Apple does not receive or use any personal data from third parties for any marketing or advertising purposes. Apple does not track its users. "

                  source: https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/en-ww/personalized-user-experiences/


                  Seems Google is very open about using anything possible about their users even when not signed in.

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The control on iOS is much stricter, and it always has been, but I suppose at least they sold it as such from the start and didn’t slowly trickle it in while pretending to be supporting open source. The spyware is also the same. They probably share it with a few fewer people I guess, that’s about the best you could possibly say for it.

            • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The control for their hardware and sofware yes. They do it all in house.

              between Google and Apple, you genuinely believe iOS tracks and retains more data than Google? Google who is a data collection agency at this point?

              Android phones preinstall meta apps as well as google apps. Both heavy trackers. Even on a galaxy ultra device, hidden meta files will remain. You can’t even plug in and remove them passed the 24 models, as samsung and google have worked to explicitly block that.

              iOS does not. iOS has apple apps preinstalled. Hell they don’t even come with youtube anymore.

              Google is also pushing to block ‘sideloading’ while apple is opening it up.

              google is putting gemini ON devices with android 17 that can read your screens and do any task on your phone without your physical interaction, beyond voice.

              There is no avenue you can show or explain to me that would paint iOS near google’s anti trust data collection. You are acting as if I said 'iOS solves the whole issue."

              • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                control for their hardware and sofware yes. They do it all in house.

                what else is there but hardware and software?

                between Google and Apple, you genuinely believe iOS tracks and retains more data than Google

                they both collect as much data as they possibly can, yeah

                Android phones preinstall meta apps as well as google apps.

                iOS does not. iOS has apple apps preinstalled. Hell they don’t even come with youtube anymore.

                That’s OEMs, not Google. AOSP doesn’t come with anything installed.

                Google is also pushing to block ‘sideloading’ while apple is opening it up.

                Google is requiring registration with ID to publish on the app store. Apple always had that. The EU is forcing them to allow other app stores. Google will also have to do that.

                google is putting gemini ON devices with android 17 that can read your screens and do any task on your phone without your physical interaction, beyond voice.

                Apple tried to do this and just failed miserably to make it work, as tech improves they will do it again

                There is no avenue you can show or explain to me that would paint iOS near google’s anti trust data collection.

                Ok, if you aren’t interested in facts I guess we’re done here…

                • rumba@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  yeah they’re just trolling, no facts, just straight downvotes anythime you post anything of substance they can’t defend against. They don’t have a point and they know it.

                • baconsunday@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  Yes, they do it all in house. is that a surprise to you? Are you under the implication other brands do it all.in house, because I have news for you child.

                  There is no evidence of apple selling data to third parties or allowing third party apps to be preinstalled on their devices. There is also no carrier locked bootloader on any iPhone.

                  ANDROID devices (which are maintained by Google) come with an abundance of preinstalled apps thay you can’t see without using a debloater (which current models have had that broken)

                  So youre arguing Apple has had a better app store considering they are adding support for sideloading where as google is removing it? Interesting switch up.

                  Anf still, Apple isn’t doing it.

                  You haven’t shown one fact. You simply posted opinionated responses to my comments.

                  You sound like a dwindeling smooth brain who just can’t live knowing people think iOS just might be better.

                  edit:

                  You had to say ‘guess you dont lile facts’ or whatever while your evidence to data tracking was ‘they both do it as much as they can’ LMFAO Youre a joke. You get no more of my time child.

    • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Fuck man I cannot buy a new phone right now. All apps I use are from fdroid. I’m kinda fucked ain’t I?

      Looking at cad$300 for a pixel 8a to get graphine on it. So sad my galaxy 9 can’t run postmarket, lineage, or anything really.

      I guess the pixel 3 (I think that’s the one) with Ubuntu touch could work. Only a hundred it looks like to get that

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You can disable updates on Samsung even if not rooted. Fix it in time to where you are. Of course, that also means no security updates, but they’re kindof forcing our hands.

        • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not for my model. This ones got a locked bootloader and no way to unlock it. Tried everything I could think of to keep this boi out of the recycling center with no dice.

          Edit: Thanks for the other suggestions though I’ll take a look when I’m getting a new phone

      • dudesss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you reformat your phone before September will one of my mentioned operating systems, f-Droid will continue working.

        If you really need a new phone, but do try to avoid it, buy one second hand one. Or buy a new one of these https://scribe.disroot.org/post/8920564 including Fairphone as an option.

    • Levi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Can I still use apps from the app store if I use one of those alternative OS’s? I’m not very good with phones and don’t use mine much, but with so many things slowly going phone only I don’t want to cut myself off entirely.

      Also, can I use those OS’s on my tablet? Which is best for somebody with decent Linux knowledge but almost no smart phone skills?

  • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t know about Google home, but google meet is definitely like this. You mute your mic from the UI, you speak, and a small popup tells you something like, “are you trying to speak, your mic is off”.

    Something like this also happened on Short Circuit (a channel of Linus Tech Tips) when testing Meta Glasses. Riley, the host was talking to it, and after the convo ended, he asked, “are you still listening?” And meta replied, “No”.

    So, yes, it is safe to assume that the microphones are always listening and probably recording. These things are spywares and do not belong in private places like homes.

    • Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Same with Teams, but the point it to mute yourself in a meeting, not from Microsoft

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      1 day ago

      Muting microphone in a meeting is very different, the point is you don’t want other attendees to hear you, not the meeting software.
      Otherwise agreed, the only way this can be 100% trusted is using a hw switch, which we won’t find on any phones and only a handful of laptops.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        From my experience (Linux), switching off the microphone from the OS settings also works. You can’t be 100% sure, of course, but why would Linux / Firefox lie for Google?

      • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Didn’t Fairphone or some other Linux phone maker include switches in some relatively recent model?

        EDIT: According to (embarrassed for having to mention source) Google’s AI summary, yes:

        • Murena 2: Features a dedicated physical privacy switch that physically cuts the circuit for the microphone and camera.

        • Purism Librem 5: Offers physical toggle switches on the side of the phone to mechanically sever power to the microphone, camera, and baseband.

        • Pine64 PinePhone: Includes built-in hardware DIP switches under the back cover that allow you to completely disconnect the mic, cameras, and modems.

            • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Huh, you’re right. Guess I just assumed it no longer had them since I dismissed getting one because it was such a downgrade in terms of other hardware. I’d only just found out about the FLX1 about a month before they switched them out, and was pissed about the downgrade because I was saving up to get the original. They lost some sales over that.

    • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Guys, ten or hundred of thousands security researchers have been going at this for years. Google isn’t secretly listening to you.

      These things work with 2 mics, and 2 different circuits. The recording mic is one, while the detection mic is another. The second mic is only capable of pattern matching.

      So yeah it’s on but only capable of hashing a 5 second recording and matching it to your voice (this shit works a lot like rsa keys if that’s helpful) to serve as a wake word. Maybe flag a simple response.

      All that’s happening is the device heard a loud sound and knows it wasn’t a match or what’s expected.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That’s the neat thing, you don’t have to believe: the researchers proved that it works like that.

          Of course that only applies to the models they tested, and not future ones, but still.

          • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.mlB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, it only applies to what they understood about the software and hardware, not any potential updates or firmware bugs being deliberately put out as backdoors. You know, the stuff that has been whistleblown on repeatedly. Oh well, why bother to remember all that stuff. It’s much easier to get angry at those nerds for spreading conspiracy theories about the Zionist glory of Google.

            The truth is, none of you would believe this stuft was secure if your life depended on it. Your threat model is to be so entertained it would be foolish to kill you. Keep clapping big boy

            • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Why are you talking about me as if you thought you knew who I was.

              I don’t believe a quarter of the shit you put on me. I don’t believe in Google having ethics, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make predictions.

              Yes, firmware updates exist. But since Google designed the things that way, there’s also a reasonable assumption that they’ll continue to work as they do for the foreseeable future. Doesn’t mean anyone should buy it or rely on it, but we weren’t talking about that.

              • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlB
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s not a reasonable assumption to make about a company that brags about how closely it works with NATO, which has very clear “counterintelligence” goals which are more like zero tolerance for anything left if you read abt Gladio and shit. I think it reflects serious inconsistencies to read articles about Palestinians being stalked and tortured by American tech companies & their gulf state benefactors, then go, oh yippee, I found security researches born and bred in the exact same creche as all the other tech psychopaths, who act befuddled like “b-buh there’s no reason google would ever do that?! It would be against their business model!! 8D” like genuinely who givrs a fuck im sorry maybe it’s just you saying this about people who brag about hauling people in for torture, that is bothering me about the remark lmao. If I missed some subtleties

        • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That’s the neat part. You don’t. There is an entire industry of devs trying to be the guy who conclusively proved all the companies are actually recording you.

      • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        Every time someone comes out and says that the phones aren’t secretly listening to us, I gotta tell this story.

        I was at one time practicing therapy in a University. We did charity work, and I was providing therapy to a homeless man. This homeless man did not have a phone, or any electronic devices of any kind. We kept in contact via email, and he would use library computers in order to connect with us.

        While providing therapy for him, the only electronic devices in the room are a batter operated digital clock, a battery operated voice recording device, and my own cell phone, locked and inactive. Nothing but my cell phone is connected to wifi or internet of any kind.

        During session one day, he started talking about wanting to move to another country. We hold our usual session, with plenty of talk about moving to that country specifically. Once the session is over, we say goodbye and he goes on his way. I go back to my desk, and within an hour or so, scrolling on my phone, I’m getting advertisements for flights and vacations to that exact country. I had never gotten advertisements to that country before, or even for much travel in general.

        So how do we explain it? The most common answer is “Oh, well he used his phone to look up flights and stuff, and google detected that your phones were near each other, and must have assumed that you would talk about it.”

        Except the other man did not have a phone, nor did he have any way for Google to tell that he was near me after having looked it up at a local library. There was no way for Google to be able to tell that he was coming to our office at all unless it was reading his emails, and even then, it couldn’t know that he was talking to me specifically, such that I would get the targeted ads and none of my colleagues would.

        Nobody can give me an explanation for what happened other than my phone was actively listening to the conversation. I’m definitely open to alternatives, I promise. Nobody has been able to explain it.

        • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I get ads in Spanish if my phone hears me use a rotary saw a lot. I used to think it was from working near Spanish-speaking work crews, or purchasing lumber, but it’s happened from isolated backyard projects using materials that had been bought with cash weeks prior. The adbots are listening, and they think power tool noises are a dialect of Spanish.

      • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s far too easy to change the software that drives that. For example, in order to minimize blatant power drain the trigger mic could easily become a switch that activates the main mic only when human voices are detected (or even specific voices). With authoritarian governments on the rise — along with the more than willing corporations backing them — I don’t think a bit of paranoia regarding the possibility is unwarranted.

        ETA: Also there’s nothing saying the hardware can’t be updated for newer capabilities without anyone on the outside knowing. It’d be pretty easy to get away with once everyone gets lulled into a false sense of security regarding how they work.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I was running a fascist government, I wouldn’t enable my spyware on every phone–that would make it too easy to detect and it would mean the people I’m spying on would take measures to protect themselves.

          Instead, I would leave a backdoor open so that I could activate the specific phone of a specific person, a phone unlikely to be monitored in a lab by a security geek.

        • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Which is why shit is continuously tested. Guys, billions of dollars goes into this. It’s not hard to find extra data pushed into packets. Far more complex shit is the norm.

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Discord does this too. Occasionally instead of putting my voice through it just says “we’re not detecting any input from your microphone” but only while I’m speaking

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Discord? Never had that. And it is super annoying that there is no mute indication. So many people “oh I was muted”, teamspeak had that solved decades ago. They also had actually distinct sounds for (in)muting…

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There’s 2 mute indicators on discord? One on your name in the channel and one in the bottom left corner, where the digital mute button is. In any case, this issue has to do with the microphone detection and not the mute button itself

          Edit: or did you mean like an audible indicator?

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s the old-school method. You ask “can you hear me?” And after someone says “no”, you know your microphone is working

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I turned off “ok google” detection in my phone. Still it triggers incorrectly from the car radio sounding similar to “ok google”. In theory turning off the detection should mean that the assistant only starts when I tap the microphone icon, but that’s not my experience.

    I can confirm, google is always listening, and it’s not even very good at pretending not to.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I never use any voice commands for my phone. So I disable it and uninstall all voice related apps and settings.

      An unexpected benefit was this significantly improves the overall performance of the phone.

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not true anymore, but Alexa’s used to only listen for specific keywords using a low-energy local-only chip.

    It has since changed, as stated, and I have to assume other vendors followed suit.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As a specific example, the ESP32 chip does low power voice recognition for pre-trained trigger words. This lightweight recognition lacks the training to detect anything other than the list of trigger words that Espressif provides.

      Basically only battery-operated devices work this way (for power consumption reasons). If you’re plugged in you’re probably always running the high quality listening loop.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This is also why a lot of the wake words are similar:

        • Hey Siri
        • Alexa / Echo
        • OK Google / Hey Google

        Those all have different vowel sounds, hard consonants etc. because without that there’s not enough difference to make a unique wake word/phrase. Google needed something like “Hey” or “OK” before it because “Google” itself doesn’t generate enough unique sounds to act as a keyword. They’re also between 3 and 5 syllables because they need to be short enough to monitor for them, and long enough that they can be distinguished reliably from background noise.

        The sounds are converted into MFCCs, which is sort-of an extremely lossy form of compression. It was originally used to identify numbers, like when someone would call into an automated switchboard and they’d have to say “one” or “five”. It couldn’t identify complex words, just distinguish between a small set of very different sounding numbers.

        The way these systems work is that they’re running on a very low-power loop converting ambient sounds into these patterns and seeing if there’s a match for a wake-word pattern. The sound is converted into basically a time vs. frequency matrix and matched against the keyword / phrase. If there’s a match it unlocks the much more computationally-expensive voice transcription programs, otherwise it just throws out the data.

        You can tell that at least mobile devices aren’t always listening because if they were actually doing full-on voice transcription all the time, the battery would drain much faster. If they were doing off-device voice transcription, the antenna would have to stay on a lot more, which would also kill the battery, and it would be visible in your bandwidth bill.

        People need some more basic computer literacy. I get that the FAANG companies are “evil”, and want to do unscrupulous things with your data, but there’s often a simpler explanation that doesn’t involve massive privacy violations that security researchers would have caught long ago.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even in the first scenario, what stops there from being multiple wake words with different functionality? So like “ok google” wakes up the bot but “pepsi” wakes it silently and has it tick a box on the back end of a server that now sends me Coke adds because they paid about $3.50 for the privilege?

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pretty much nothing. Any company with the resources of Google or Amazon could easily have their top 100 wake words trained into that model.

  • Art3mis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are we ai upscaling so many things??? Like what does that playdoughy smoothness add to anything. Espescially 10 year old memes 😭

    (i dont blame op, anybody still using google or unaltered ddg will get ai for their first like page or two of image results)

  • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Last I muted mine it did this still. I believe the rationale is that wake word detection is local

    I plan on moving away from the ecosystem but haven’t yet been able to invest time and money in a home assistant setup and start thinking about migrating

    (I know many feel smart home tech is frivolous and just a security risk and privacy violation- I use automation to help manage a disability/medical condition)

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I have been very happy with local stuff. I have home assistant running on a pi, independent of my main server (cause I wanna control the lights easily while changing server hardware).

      All my smart devices (lamps, mostly) use Zigbee, and it’s just way easier and more flexible than classical dimmers. There’s local voice recognition support, but for that I’d probably run it on something with more horsepower than a raspi.

      • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, I’ve been planning to set up a smart light switch in my kitchen and if/when I eventually get to that I’ll be setting up a home assistant install on a little thin client and using ZigBee instead of a WiFi device directly connected to google home. That way I can start to play with automation in haos and start connecting all of my existing wifi devices through haos on my own hardware.

        I’d like to transition everything to offline protocols running locally, its just kind of a project and takes money. A while back I was doing my research for it and I think I decided on hardware, but haven’t gotten further than that, I just kinda have too many expenses and projects on my plate for the moment

        I’m looking forward to all the tech stuff I depend on being actually my own in the future though :)

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, totally understand that. Had an easy start cause I got a lot of Philips Hue stuff for free from a friend who got fed up with smart tech in general. He now has a Pixel with mostly blank Graphene and a Raspberry Pi as his only computing devices, lol.

          I had a lot of fun programming click patterns for smart switches that are incomprehensible for anyone but me XD

          Good luck with your transition~

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You muted yourself from the conversation, but it still listens for commands.

    Also, I love how every time “microphone” is mentioned on social media, the social media/spyware sockpuppets come out and say “well aktually…” and put this word vomit all over the place hoping you’ll just roll over and accept it. Must be a nice paycheck to cash…

  • Tehdastehdas@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My recommendations on Quora’s feed follow closely what I’ve said with an Android phone present, even someone else’s phone, as my presence is detected by Google from my voice and my /e/OS phone’s radio traffic.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Quora-listening-to-my-conversations-Why-do-suggestions-pop-up-relating-to-what-I-am-talking-to-my-friends-family-about-offline/answers/320063126

    I highly recommend GrapheneOS, /e/OS, Jolla Sailfish OS Linux phone, or anything that doesn’t work for Google or Apple. My battery life (idling) went from 2 days with Android to a whole week with /e/OS, because spying consumes energy.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I had this cheap android phone, it costed like €70/80, the battery life would die in a day or even less, in idle and then i decided to get rid of google play services, assistant ecc and now the damn battery can survive 7 fucking days in idle with termux in background hosting a discord bot this shit is just crazy