• zwerg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They made their ‘allies’ pay a 10% surcharge… and then spent the ammunition on a fruitless war with Iran instead. So, no, they are not sending weapons or ammunition any more.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It just highlights the dependency on the US. To frame it as if the EU is fighting without the US gives the opposite impression.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Trick question because I think we are fighting for the US.

          The usual link:

          in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

          We are past that opportunity but the EU and Russia could have formed an economic union and could have become that challenger.

          Instead China is about to become that challenger. The US cannot isolate China if Russia is delivering all necessary resources. So the US is using the Ukraine war to weaken Russia to change that somehow.

          Buying the weapons is not a problem. Buying government bonds was the way of the EU to finance the US government weapons programs. With tariffs that has shifted to direct purchases.

          So to the EU it looks like we just defend Ukraine. But the big winner is the US because they achieve their long-term goal, which turns the with into a for.