• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    5 days ago

    For the life of me I don’t understand why people are putting them anywhere before every rooftop is covered with them. Roofs are dead space and unlikely to have debris issues (at least compared to a railway).

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s companies trying to make a quick buck. They tried this with roads too.

      Obviously every home should have them first and all newly built homes should be built with solar efficiency in mind.

    • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Deployment on rails is dirty cheap. Can be highly automated and you have highvolt power line just a few meters away.

      If you put solar upon your roof, 2/3 of the costs are labor costs. The material bill encompasses electrics, mounting system, cables, and pv panels that can get reduced on railways as well.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        Cheap if you only count the cost of plopping them down and walking away, the train could kick up enough dust and debris that efficiency is impacted significantly more than installing them on a roof would have been, necessitating installing new ones sooner.

        • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s all theory. That’s why I think it’s worth a try and learn the facts.

          Edit: A rough estimation with averages: 10 kWp gives 11kwh a year in Swiss, 1kwp panel costs 500€, 1kwh energy costs 0,28 EUR in Swiss. Panel material costs for 10 kWp is 5,000€ and earns you 3,080€ (11,000*0,28€) yearly. This shows the value of the idea.

          • gazter@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Don’t forget about the inverters.

            Low voltage (such as the output from a solar panel) suffers badly from losses over distance. Centralised solar makes up for this by having a large amount of panels close to a central inverter. There is going to be a distance tipping point of cost vs losses, if this is short and you need a lot of inverters, that’s going to become a major expense.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Every parking lot needs approval of the location, its probably a a pain in the ass, and would disrupt parking while being built which impacts sales (or will be perceived to anyway). If this worked, you only need to deal with a small group of people for a very large space.

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You need some serious concrete and/or steel hardware to build a carpark roof that can hold the solar panels without easily being damaged by cars or broken by strong wind, so that massively inflates the costs. If you had a state owned company producing cheap solutions for this it could work though.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, a lot of the places around me are putting up these massive structures. I don’t know why they don’t just install open sided polebarns

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Roofs are actually not that great. Installation is expensive because you are working at height. Roof angles and directions are also not ideal on many houses. Compare it to a simple installation on a field: You just take some corn field, stop growing corn there and can put your panels on some cheap holders and you’re good. You can access and service them without the danger of falling from a roof. You can install them on an industrial scale instead of a few square meters on every single roof. You need only one electrical installation.

      People love to cry about the loss of agricultural space, but currently we are growing a lot of corn to convert it to fuel or to put it into biogas installations. If you convert those field to solar, you will get more energy from them. And the loss of a big monoculture that is using a lot of pesticides is also great.

        • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And even if you do not: It’s better for the environment to not grow corn and just have some grass underneath the solar panels.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you choose the right crops or use grazing pastures in warmer climates, it’s not bad either.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hell parking lots are massive areas of dead space, build them over the damned things, it’ll help against the heat island affect and give shade.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      You can lay them down and remove them again and also clean them with automation. There are power lines nearby as well as consumers, electric trains.

      Installing on roofs is manual labor and needs electricians. Which is why you see so many solar farms by the roadside.