OC

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    With someone like him, after being publicly lynched, the corpse should be thrown into the nearest sewerage processing plant because that’s where shit belongs.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The classic move is to drag their lifeless body through the streets of the capitol to the cheers of people and the rain of ticker-tape confetti.

      The reason Hitler killed himself and had his remains burned immediately was because he was afraid of this very fate.

  • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Funny but a terrible fucking idea

    The whole point is making sure everyone realizes that you can’t use anything down there, that there’s no gold, no wealth, etc.

    But let’s say you buried Trump down there… Maybe not now but in 100 years, you might have some weird rumors floating around about how they secretly buried this corrupt leader who stole tons of money from the US into this one area where no one would think to dig up because of those signs.

    You would ruin the point of those sites. Nothing but unwanted radioactive waste should ever be laid there and spoken of laid there. As soon as you use it as an actual tomb, you will eventually have literal tomb raiders. You don’t want any historians even considering it. There should be no good reason.

  • lauha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Better bury them in normal unmarked grave in the middle of nowhere so they will be forgotten.

    OP is proposing a monument to the people we hate which is opposite to what we want.

      • lauha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, but better not vitrify. Better just burn the body so there’s nothing remaining. Vitrifying will just preserve them, which we don’t want. I propose burning because nothing will be remaining of them

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Burning, as in common cremation, turns someone to ash with some components that are not fully reduced. Vitrification homogenizes them even further.

          But the point is also to take them out of the ecological cycle. The material of scattered ashes are processed by the ecology and eventually are reintegrated into larger and larger life forms again. By reducing a tyrant to a solid and locking them in a vault, their material is removed from the life cycle for as close to eternity as we can fathom.

          Now if we had the option of throwing them into the sun, that would nicely reduce them to plasma, but that involves a heavy duty launch vehicle like the Atlas V. (My dad did the calculation once, and that would get about 150 lbs into the sun. Escaping earth is expensive.)

          • lauha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t believe in soul so symbolically removing them isn’t necessary. Burning to ashes will reduce them enough to make anything it impossible to trace any component back to them after spreading in to the nature. You’re just wasting resources on people you don’t like which sounds countrr productive

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plenty of political assassinations in history have been committed not by faction agents or hit men commissioned by a conspiracy but by solitary individuals with a grudge and a will.