• KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be somewhat fair, all of Russia’s claims in Ukraine (Crimea, the Donbas) would give them unparalleled access to the Sea of Azov and the northern banks of the Black Sea. Yes, I know they control a significant portion of the Black Sea already, but this would allow them to wrap the Sea of Azov nicely.

    I know Russia states they’re there to kick the Nazis out of the Donbas and protect the Russian language minority in that region, but I also don’t believe any nation, especially a very nationalistic, neoliberal government like Russia’s, is out doing something out of the goodness of their hearts. Call me a cynic, but I think the expanded Black Sea control is more important to the government.

    • egg1918 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see the expanded Black Sea control as a way to sure up control of Crimea. If they didn’t then the only physical connection between Crimea and the rest of Russia would be the bridge, which has shown to be quite vulnerable.

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s literally just to stop NATO expansion, protecting Russian speakers in Ukraine is just an incidental political benefit

      The “warm port” and “land grab” theories are pure nonsense that ignore the last 8 years of Eastern European history