• grahamja@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also am under the assumption that no material exists that could be stacked tall enough to build a space elevator.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’d want tensile strength rather than compressive. The trick is to anchor a counterweight out beyond your target distance and let it pull the weight of the cable up rather than building a tower. Think of swinging a ball on a string rather than building a skyscraper. Assuming a sufficiently sized counterweight you can support the weight of the anchoring cable plus whatever else you want to hang off of it (space dock, elevator terminus, etc.)

    • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      stacked tall enough…? The space elevator concept is a geostationary node orbiting earth directly above a fixed point, with cables running between them. Not a gigantic skyscraper up into the sky. What am I missing?

      • Cosmicomical@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You probably haven’t read 3001: the final odissey, in any case i think most ideas of space elevators are not like a lift, they are more like skyscrapers indeed.
        Edit: i might be very wrong though, i’m not up to date on this

    • Heggico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you build it tall enough, centrifugal force will start pulling on it. Building it that way though… But yeah. Doubt the right material exist atm.