• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because Toyota invested a lot into hydrogen instead of EV, and they need to recuperate at least some of it.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I’m glad that somebody is exploring other environmentally friendly alternatives too, nothing wrong with having options.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Kind of? Hydrogen can be environmentally friendly, but EVs have big advantages:

        • Creating and burning hydrogen is way less efficient than EVs (almost an order of magnitude)
        • Hydrogen is much cheaper to create in environmentally unfriendly ways (using natural gas etc.)
        • Unless we have massive overproduction of power, the additional energy can be better used to de-carbonify other processes with larger impact
        • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why generating hydrogen during off-peak hours from a nuclear power plant will be very beneficial. It may be less efficient but way better for the environment then lithium

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You still have all the transport and storage costs associated with hydrogen. I’d need to see a study that actually determines the environmental impact of lithium to believe you.

    • Geobloke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve invested heavily into a partnership with Panasonic to build solid state batteries too . They hand just spread their risk