The privacy sub may be even more paranoid than the stim subs.

This haunts them in their sleep:

programming-communism

    • jaeme@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Android is leagues ahead of Apple, first of all, the core of Android is libre, anyone is able to take Android and create their own mobile operating system around it (with various amounts of success). Of course, this leads to OEMs who create bastardized nonfree operating systems with privacy holes, but it also leads to things like Vanilla Android, GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, /e/ etc.

      There are also GNU/Linux phones like UBports, GNOME/KDE mobile shell, so it’s not a binary decision.

      Android is not without its flaws (like Google play services and closed down hardware), but to say it’s not better than Apple is misleading. Countries choose Android, only America pushes their Apple sludge.

        • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To be clear, it is possible to defend yourself, but ofc no defense is perfect. For illegal activities that might attract federal attention? best to avoid them at all costs. But for general privacy in your day to day life that isn’t practical for most people, and “every cellphone is snitching on you” is way too reductive, even if it’s true in a sense.

          For example the person you are replying to mentions Linux phones, many of which publish schematics and make hardware kill switches for the discrete modem a big selling point. That still isn’t perfect protection, but it would protect you from a stingray… and if you have a thought out threat model, you can make the choice whether or not that device is appropriate for your situation.