Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoJill Stein formally launches 2024 White House bid as Green party candidatewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square358fedilinkarrow-up1232
arrow-up1232external-linkJill Stein formally launches 2024 White House bid as Green party candidatewww.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square358fedilink
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYep. I’m definitely not the troll in this thread. But please, do keep proving me right.
minus-squaregoldenlocks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’m the one substantiating my arguments
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYep, keep proving it by never answering my question. Good work.
minus-squaregoldenlocks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI presented photographic evidence that the clintons were in fact closer to Putin than Jill Stein
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYes, I know, anything to avoid answering my question.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’m pretty sure I presented photographic evidence that the clintons were in fact closer to Putin than Jill Stein Does not answer the question Am I a troll not worth talking to or not? Which is it? But I guess you’ve already tacitly answered it. If only you’d just admit it.
minus-squaregoldenlocks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt does answer your question much better than you can answer mine: what proof do you have that Jill Stein is working for Putin?
Yep. I’m definitely not the troll in this thread. But please, do keep proving me right.
I’m the one substantiating my arguments
Yep, keep proving it by never answering my question. Good work.
I presented photographic evidence that the clintons were in fact closer to Putin than Jill Stein
Yes, I know, anything to avoid answering my question.
That did answer your question
I’m pretty sure
Does not answer the question
But I guess you’ve already tacitly answered it. If only you’d just admit it.
It does answer your question much better than you can answer mine: what proof do you have that Jill Stein is working for Putin?
Still no answer…