Is there drama or a story I’m missing? As I understand it, from lemmy.world I can see their posts but they cannot see mine. Why did beehaw block lemmy.world?

  • Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s no actual drama. It’s just that Beehaw admins have a specific view on how their instance should be, and for that they need stricter behaviour and content control. Based on that they defederated lemmy.world due to [ipsis digitis] “inability to effectively moderate that instance’s users”.

    I am not too big of a fan of defederation, nor of stricter admin/moderator control, but in this specific case I can understand and agree with their decision, even if I use content from both instances - it makes sense in the context.

        • Lvxferre
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So basically, they want to be like reddit with authoritative mods and overreactive bans.

          Wrong.

          Beehaw has a specific goal, and it’s transparently taking actions to further that goal. It’s neither acting “on a whim” or enforcing hidden rules, like Reddit authoritative mods would.

          Personally I don’t like this sort of moderation, I feel better in environments where mods/admins let users sort themselves out, but to compare it with the situation in Reddit is, if I may be honest, a fucking stupid false equivalence. And even if we two don’t need safe spaces, it’s good to have a few of them here and there, and Beehaw fits that role fine.

          • @Elkaki123@vlemmy.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 year ago

            Agree with the sentiment, I don’t need it nor is it my thing, I prefer to be the one that has to do the blocking rather than mods, but I can see why it’s there.

            I hate when people try to do safe spaces and some outsider looks at it and starts staying it’s authoritarian, an echo chamber, propaganda, power hungry admins, etc. Like, dude if there is a group of people that want to be protected from certain rethoric, it’s pathetic to act with indignation just because the don’t want everyone to interact. Not every community is about fitting everyone and being neutral, as long as they are transparent with it let them have their place in peace.

              • Lvxferre
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I don’t feel it as creepy; it’s useful for some situations, topics, and people. In special, it’s a good way to build a comfy place for people in marginalised groups to talk about their stuff, without hearing for the 20956th time the same helicopter joke.

            • Lvxferre
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can’t say that for certain

              That’s appeal to ignorance but I’ll bite.

              Perhaps I can’t claim it with complete certainty; but that applies to everyone, and everything. Nobody can be fully certain of anything at all. However since that leads to some useless trash called “solipsism”, we need to put an arbitrary line somewhere, and say that some things are certain enough to allow us to claim them “for certain”.

              And, in this case, we got two good ways to place that line: 1) consistency with the data at hand, and 2) Ockham’s razor.

              What I claimed is consistent with the behaviour and statements of the administration of that instance, and it explains the event (their decision to defederate lemmy.world). And it’s also the simplest explanation for it. So yeah, I am claiming it for certain.

              You know what can’t be claimed for certain though? What someone else “wants”. For example, your claim that they “want to be like Reddit”.

              yet you certainly seem to believe it.

              This is pretty much ignorable given that nobody have access to anyone else’s “beliefs”.

    • lamermannOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Ah. Technically, could they re-federate with Lemmy.world whenever they want or does re-federation require some sort of approval from lemmy.world admins?

      • @mysoulishome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I’m hoping they will. I subscribed to some beehaw communities that look appealing. I chose Lemmy.world out of convenience and I also appreciate the dude behind it…once things settle it would be sad if they don’t allow any LW people because of a few shitposters.

        • @Elkaki123@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Have you considered making an account there (or on a non blocked lemmy instance), especially with how most apps I’ve used allow for multiple accounts and changing with two taps I don’t think there is much reason not tp make an account in the meantime.

  • @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    It’s just that the moderation tools aren’t yet there to allow a server that wants low drama to federate with a server that’s attracting a lot of general-public attention.

    • lamermannOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Good point. I assume they’ll improve as time goes on.

  • lamermannOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Thanks for the links! I guess that’s the power of the Fediverse; everyone can do or not do their own thing. ☺️