return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1370cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1370external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square58fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoGovernment doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
Government doesn’t help much with court, except where they change the law
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?