• sunbeam60
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    You hit the nail on the head.

    I see this so many places - nobody asks “how big does this company need to be”? This is the problem with public companies - they are caught in an endless growth trap. Private businesses at least get to a point where a) growth has to happen sustainably because often there isn’t endless money available to invest and b) once you’ve got one private jet, as owners, do you really need another?

    Reddit was no different. Maybe it would have been better for us all if it was a much smaller team and just careful tendered like a garden that had filled its plot.

      • sunbeam60
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well yeah, but we both know they are behaving like a company heading for an attempted IPO.

        • Copernican@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          But that’s why I don’t think the private vs public company distinction is what matters. When it comes to private, there’s a whole class of private equity owned companies that some people won’t even consider working at because of the reputation their cost cutting and flip mentality is. It’s not a black and white private good public bad because only one has public share holders and exchanges.

          • sunbeam60
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s definitely not as simple as my quick comment on Lemmy pretends, agreed.