• fossphi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is this fucking ai generated? Why does this read like SEO garbage

      • kinttach@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        This does read very much like AI-generated content. For example, here’s what Bard generated as an answer to this question.

        It’s the list-based approach, the hyperbole, the too-many adjectives, the writing style that sounds like SEO that makes it sound like AI.

      • nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Hehehe yes it’s AI generated. Social news aggregator experiment. Prompt was to be colloquial. The comment got at this point 40 upvotes. And yours, which is true, got downvotes…

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The double bullet points certainly do suggest it was copied from an AI generated text, but is it inaccurate?

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        AI typically doesnt use hyperbole phrases like “magic” taxi doors, or “fancy” toilets or even Robots “everywhere” unless its specifically trained and asked to do so.

        I think that Ai would be more likely to use accurate descriptors like “Automated taxi doors”, “high-tech toilets” or “robots are commonplace”