Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • Auli@lemmy.caEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    There response well be we don’t know we can’t understand what its doing.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      10 months ago

      There response well be we don’t know we can’t understand what its doing.

      What the fuck is this kind of response? Its just a fucking neural network running on GPUs with convolutional kernels. For fucks sake, turn on your damn brain.

      Generative AI is actually one of the easier subjects to comprehend here. Its just calculus. Use of derivatives to backpropagate weights in such a way that minimizes error. Lather-rinse-repeat for a billion iterations on a mass of GPUs (ie: 20 TFlop compute systems) for several weeks.

      Come on, this stuff is well understood by Comp. Sci by now. Not only 20 years ago when I learned about this stuff, but today now that AI is all hype, more and more people are understanding the basics.

      • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        9·
        10 months ago

        Understanding the math behind it doesn’t immediately mean understanding the decision progress during forward propagation. Of course you can mathematically follow it, but you’re quickly gonna lose the overview with that many weights. There’s a reason XAI is an entire subfield in Machine Learning.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          10 months ago

          Understanding the math behind it doesn’t immediately mean understanding the decision progress during forward propagation.

          Ummm… its lossy compressed data from the training set.

          Is it a perfect copy? No. But copyright law covers “derivative data” so whatever, the law remains clear on this situation.