Flying Squid to News@lemmy.world • 14 hours agoElon Musk Apparently Managed to Sue Unilever Into Advertising on X Againgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1252
arrow-up1252external-linkElon Musk Apparently Managed to Sue Unilever Into Advertising on X Againgizmodo.comFlying Squid to News@lemmy.world • 14 hours agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareoriginaluciferlinkfedilink80•13 hours agobut its unilever. they have nearly unlimited funds to fight musk… if they wanted to i suspect they just didnt want the unilever name and its bazillion brands brought into public lawsuits for marketing reasons
minus-square@PugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish13•13 hours agoOh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic “Cost not worth the price” reasoning still applies.
minus-square@PugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish14•13 hours ago… a lot of those are repeated multiple times?
minus-square@corsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 hours agoTo answer the question as written: yes.
minus-square@can@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink18•edit-212 hours agoI think it’s the continents the brands are Edit: actually “cif” is called “vim” in canada, so maybe there wasn’t that much thought put into it. Here’s a Wikipedia list instead.
minus-squareoriginaluciferlinkfedilink28•13 hours agoyou spelled ‘losing potential profits not worth fighting nazis’ wrong
minus-square@PugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish15•13 hours agoYeah, I mean, that’s the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like “not helping genocide along” or “preventing fascism”.
minus-squareFlying SquidOPlinkfedilink13•13 hours agoSee my response to @Docus. They own half the brands in half the houses in the world.
but its unilever. they have nearly unlimited funds to fight musk… if they wanted to
i suspect they just didnt want the unilever name and its bazillion brands brought into public lawsuits for marketing reasons
Oh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic “Cost not worth the price” reasoning still applies.
You probably know some of their brands
… a lot of those are repeated multiple times?
To answer the question as written: yes.
I think it’s the continents the brands are
Edit: actually “cif” is called “vim” in canada, so maybe there wasn’t that much thought put into it.
Here’s a Wikipedia list instead.
you spelled ‘losing potential profits not worth fighting nazis’ wrong
Yeah, I mean, that’s the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like “not helping genocide along” or “preventing fascism”.
See my response to @Docus. They own half the brands in half the houses in the world.