@testeronious@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoDiscord is laying off 17 percent of employeeswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up1713cross-posted to: games@lemmit.onlinegames@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1713external-linkDiscord is laying off 17 percent of employeeswww.theverge.com@testeronious@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square162fedilinkcross-posted to: games@lemmit.onlinegames@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareExocrinouslinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoA good boss takes responsibility for anything that happens on their watch. Even if the worker did something wrong, the boss is still responsible for hiring them. It can also be the fault of the shareholders though
minus-square@sunbeam60linkEnglish1•6 months agoAnd you are saying there is only two states possible for execs: “everything is fine” or “you’re fired”?
minus-square@sunbeam60linkEnglish1•6 months agoI’m trying to introduce nuance. You seem to propose that all execs are fired for any issue. That doesn’t strike me as particularly nuanced.
minus-squareExocrinouslinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoNo, I’m not proposing that. You’re really awful at this.
So is all reductions the fault of the execs?
A good boss takes responsibility for anything that happens on their watch. Even if the worker did something wrong, the boss is still responsible for hiring them.
It can also be the fault of the shareholders though
And you are saying there is only two states possible for execs: “everything is fine” or “you’re fired”?
No. You seem really bad at grasping nuance.
I’m trying to introduce nuance. You seem to propose that all execs are fired for any issue. That doesn’t strike me as particularly nuanced.
No, I’m not proposing that. You’re really awful at this.