Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前Tipping culture npcslemmy.worldimagemessage-square675fedilinkarrow-up11.26K
arrow-up11.26KimageTipping culture npcslemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square675fedilink
minus-squaregeneraldenmark@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up163·1 年前Americans be like; “If you can’t afford to pay 69% tip then don’t go out eating at all”
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up106·1 年前If you’re going to say “69%” , you need to call it eating out, not out eating.
minus-squarejoelfromaus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 年前It’s only eating out if it’s 69%, otherwise it’s just sparkling oral.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·1 年前Also, complaining that things will cost too much if waiters eek by on more than minimum wage.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up36·1 年前The cost is literally the same… Restaurants would just be upfront about it then.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前That would be upsetting to the business owners, though. You know - the Job Creators.
minus-squareDavid_Eight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前If I’m directly responsible for their salary, then they’re working for me. I created that job.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 年前You assume the restaurant’s prices are connected to wages in any meaningful way. We’re paying the wages. That’s all food cost and profit.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Eek! They eke out a living on so little!
minus-squareSeabassDan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 年前I gotta say, complaining about being on the verge of a recession while going out for a $70 meal really puts my poverty into perspective.
minus-squareMidnight Wolf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前If all I had to do was 69 my waiter, I’d be eating out a lot more
Americans be like; “If you can’t afford to pay 69% tip then don’t go out eating at all”
If you’re going to say “69%” , you need to call it eating out, not out eating.
It’s only eating out if it’s 69%, otherwise it’s just sparkling oral.
While getting fucked! What a meal!
Also, complaining that things will cost too much if waiters eek by on more than minimum wage.
The cost is literally the same… Restaurants would just be upfront about it then.
That would be upsetting to the business owners, though. You know - the Job Creators.
If I’m directly responsible for their salary, then they’re working for me. I created that job.
You assume the restaurant’s prices are connected to wages in any meaningful way. We’re paying the wages. That’s all food cost and profit.
Eek! They eke out a living on so little!
I gotta say, complaining about being on the verge of a recession while going out for a $70 meal really puts my poverty into perspective.
If all I had to do was 69 my waiter, I’d be eating out a lot more