“I will no longer be complicit in genocide [in Gaza]. I am about to engage in an extreme act of protest,” the man apparently said before setting himself alight and repeatedly shouting “Free Palestine!”

Archive link

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    372
    ·
    9 months ago

    Law enforcement also drew a gun on the burning man during the incident, according to a report by Task and Purpose.

    When you’re a hammer…

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      325
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I read that and was like “of fucking course they did.” Honestly the next paragraph makes it even worse, IMO.

      Authorities were heard asking the man – “May I help you, sir?” – at first but as soon as he was engulfed in flames they started yelling at him to get down on the ground. They even drew their guns on the burning man before someone pushed them to get fire extinguishers to extinguish the fire.

      Threats of physical violence are the only tool they have in their toolbox. THE ONLY tool.

      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        116
        ·
        9 months ago

        Threats of physical violence are the only tool they have in their toolbox. THE ONLY tool.

        And actual gun violence. They’re the sniwflakiest and wimpiest of the all, bringing an AK-47 to a civilised discussion and feeling “threatened”.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            casually j-walks across a non busy street

            https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/california-police-shooting-jaywalking-video-b1806614.html

            Sheriff’s deputies from Orange County fatally shot the man, 42-year-old Kurt Reinhold, amid an altercation in September in San Clemente, California.

            The video, released on Thursday last week, shows two sheriff’s deputies considering whether or not to charge Reinhold with jaywalking, before tackling him to the floor.

            Reports say the sheriff’s deputies were on patrol and were assigned to the homeless outreach team, when the shooting took place.

            One of the deputies says in the video, “Watch this, he’s going to jaywalk,” before asking Reinhold: "Are you going to stop or are we going to have to make you stop?

            "Jaywalking here? That’s ridiculous,” Reinhold adds.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, but I’m sure you can get shot by police if you have an onion - that’s basically a biological weapon to assault delicate cop eyes.

  • tree@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    255
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s a bit of a beleaguered point, but it’s very telling that this will assuredly get almost no coverage on big news networks like abc, cbs, fox, etc. and virtually no coverage in the larger papers like the NYT, sure the press agencies like Reuters and the AP will cover it and then redistributors like your source will publish this, but little thought among the media class/commentariet will be given to the man who decided there was so little hope of being able to do anything through legal/electoral means to stop a genocide that he could no longer stand idly by and had to do something to protest the sheer inhumanity of what’s going on. Barely anyone probably still remembers the person who did the same thing and died in 2022 on earth day protesting inaction on climate change/destruction, that story was absolutely buried. I don’t support any kind of self harm, but doing something as drastic as this requires a pretty compelling reason, most people remember Tibetan monks doing the same thing, but the same importance was not extended to that person in 2022 and will almost definitely not be extended to this person now. I may end up being wrong, but I expect this to be out of the news cycle/discourse in days at most.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was listening to BBC World Report this morning. They made quick mention of it along with some other things happening in the conflict, then went on to introduce their “expert” who would illuminate the situation.

      Their so called expert was an employee of some Israeli institute of security or whatever, and he talked on for ages with minimal push-back about how the israeli army is doing everything by the book and how “Gaza is safe for civilians, and if it’s not it’s the fault of Hamas”.

      That was all the coverage they did.

      What a fucking joke.

      • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        76
        ·
        9 months ago

        “gee why did he set himself on fire? must just be something people do”

        it’s laughable how US media attributes self-immolation in Tibet to what must be CPC oppression, but self-immolation in the US must just be a cute little coincidence due to poor mental health

      • tree@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        9 months ago

        you managed so thoroughly to miss the point I was making, I’m impressed

      • Ooops@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t confuse people whose whole narrative is build on some conspiracy of media suppression with facts.

        I guess skipping the term “Lügenpresse” to avoid the obvious link was deemed enough progress to keep that same 100 years old tactic alive…

        • onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          ·
          9 months ago

          They said almost no and virtually no coverege. It’s not anti-semitic to point out that western media is heavily skewed towards Israel. You’re completely delusional if you think that’s not the case.

          Obviously there were going to be articles about the man who set himself on fire just as there was for the person who did it in 2022 due to the climate crisis. The point is the attention the media places on WHY it happens that is being ignored or heavily downplayed.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      most people remember Tibetan monks doing the same thing

      Out of political selfimmolations there were 7 Tibetan cases, but dozens of others including many Americans. I wonder why “most people” remember particularly those. Would it be that US media wasn’t fair to report not only this one here?

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lmao that’s what i was talking about, the one on this album cover wasn’t even Tibetan, he was Thích Quảng Đức, a Vietnamese buddhist monk, selfimmolating in Saigon in 1963 as protest against US-backed South Vietnam government persecuting buddhists.
          So why people like you think he was Tibetan if not for media misleading you? This was literally the most famous of public selfimmolation and the one that started it all for in XX century.

    • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 months ago

      doing something as drastic as this requires a pretty compelling reason

      I’ve already had a couple people immediately retort “wow mental health is scary”, then say “nobody will remember his name”.

      These people will shamelessly undermine any action then act disappointed that these actions are quickly ignored.

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      They didn’t even share his name, either it is something middle eastern sounding or they just want everyone to forget about him.

    • Lath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      Few people will remember him, but if any are spurred into action by his act, then it won’t be a completely wasteful loss of life.

      • tree@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve seen some discourse that things like this when done by an individual as opposed to a group effort like the Tibetan monks are primarily to take their own life and the message is secondary/additional, but I would like to think that on some level something positive will come out of someone doing something as drastic and sad as this. Dying or taking your own life is not something positive or to be glorified, but when someone feels so hopeless to the point that they turn to this, I hope it’s at least a wake up call for some people to take this seriously and not just ignore/tune out one of the biggest genocides in recent history.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, my first thought was, “Crikey! Has anyone in the united states self -immolated, before?!”

      It’s a horrific way to call attention to a cause. I’m sure after his best possible recovery, his military unit will rally to prosecute to add to his anguish.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m sure after his best possible recovery

        I don’t think he’ll recover. (In fact, apparently it is already being reported that he died. But even if he hasn’t yet he will.) He was taking deep lungfuls of flame and smoke to continue his chant. He’ll have destroyed his lungs. He knew going in that he wouldn’t come out of this alive.

        What a brave man.

        • MajikalMonkey2000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Thank you for sharing this list, we should probably be more aware of the sacrifice these people have made. The vast majority of the Americans have done it for honorable causes.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          9 months ago

          The first case of an active duty serviceman self immolating in the US. Alice Herz was the first one in the US, but there have been a dozen or two since then.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              9 months ago

              Right, which I confirmed. The person you replied to asked if it had ever happened in the US before, without specifying the military service. That’s why I clarified that this is not close to the first US self immolation generally (not even the first in response to the same thing), only for active service members.

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s right. It says a lot, either way and this thread makes me feel very sad. It says a lot, and not on the actors. It’s rather too much to bang out on social media but it gives one a long pause for deep reflection. It feels about like one little old self confronting the collective unconscious again.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, the megacorps will only allow this on main TV when pushing regulation against protesting.

      Like, "think of how many innocent moneys lives we would save if we shoot protesters’.

    • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I get so tired of this talking point. New York times, Washington Post, and even Fox news each have an article (or multiple) on this event.

      • tree@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        OMG THEY HAVE AN ARTICLE OMG THAT WAS TOTALLY MY POINT, I QUITE LITERALLY TALKED ABOUT REDISTRIBUTING THINGS FROM PRESS AGENCIES JFC, HOW CAN YOU READ WHAT I WROTE AND GET TO THIS, IS THERE ANYTHING RESIDING IN BETWEEN YOUR EARS ???

  • amzd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    9 months ago

    as he was engulfed in flames they started yelling at him to get down on the ground. They even drew their guns on the burning man before someone pushed them to get fire extinguishers to extinguish the fire.

    Stop killing yourself or I’ll shoot you! lmao

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seems weird that an anarchist was a US soldier. Maybe he joined before he came to the political beliefs he held as he burned, or perhaps he came to these beliefs because of what he saw in the army.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        9 months ago

        That happens quite a lot when you recruit teenagers with the promise of tech job skills.

      • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Excuse me, what?

        It is incontrovertibly ON TOPIC to point out the fact that his dying words were FREE PALESTINE followed by a scream of DEATH AGONY because he was ON FIRE. His remarks factually did not conclude in the reported way. This is not a joke. I disagree it is crass or insensitive (Whose sensibilities am I supposed to have offended, precisely? More importantly: why the fuck should I care that their feelings are hurt by my pointing out the message he died to scream to the world?), and regardless it is factual and relevant. Go back and watch again if you don’t believe me, if you have the courage.

        “Crass jokes” aren’t prohibited by your badly written rules even if it were a joke.

        Your moderator indiscretion is what is crass here, if anything. Shame on you.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Nah i’m with the mods on that one, it came off way too much like you were laughing at them.

          • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Well, I’ll be the first to admit it’s very hard to tell what a person’s intent is through text alone. I could have provided more context. I suppose it felt to me like it didn’t need context because it was seared into my brain.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the 2nd one. The only reason we’re even hearing about this is because he had to foresight to live stream it and also an independent journalist was there with a camera

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Anyone who still visits reddit, how [deleted] is this story over there?

    Edit: I’ve created a torrent for the video if anyone wants to help seed. His sacrifice in bringing attention to the US-sponsored genocide in Palestine must not be forgotten.

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wait really? Just using genocide gets you banned in politics? What a bunch of shmeggs. I got banned there years ago because the mods simply went through my post history. I’m still shook with how the narrative and mind of users are tilted towards a very skewed viewpoint.

        Some people believe the user base of reddit is diverse, and they’re getting a healthy view of the world. Unbewknowest to them they find themselves dumbfounded when the world isn’t conforming to what they believe is the majority opinion

      • olivebranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        r/politics mods are horrific. In the mod log (at the bottom of the screen) you can see they delete posts just because of different opinions.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        So that is what “politically correct” means when we let the far right define it. If it can’t be mentioned, it doesn’t exist.

      • SummerIsTooWarm [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        To be fair, that post in particular seems to have been locked because it is a repost. This post is older and has quite a bit of engagement. While a quick search in the popular subs reveals that this story seems to be surpressed there, it is not true for r/TheDeprogram. Even if that sub has some problems, this story is none of them.

        The screenshot was posted to r/TheDeprogram, it wasn’t taken there, I’m dumb.

          • SummerIsTooWarm [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Oh, I misunderstood. I thougth that the pic was from the deprogram sub. Thats why I went there and looked it up, because it would be very surprising to see that su censoring something like this.

            Edit: It even says r/pics on the top of the screenshot, either I’m blind or I already forgot the layout of stormfront (or both)

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fucking Christ my hearts beating so fast. Goddamn i didn’t want to see that but i watched it cus i thought i owed it to him… Goddamnit.

      And also shout out to the “hero” pointing his gun at his smouldering corpse as if it will lunge at him any moment.

      Goddamnit

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        That was fucking something. I’m like you I watch it because we owe it to him.

        He kept screaming free Palestine over and over, past the point where his lungs had to be toast, and stayed standing so long.

        • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          When people perform stunts (stuntmen running around engulfed in flames for movies) the most critical part, aside from extinguishing the flames as soon as is necessary, is making sure those people have oxygen. The fire will consume the oxygen that you would otherwise breathe in.

          • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, but when you inhale super heated air, it scorches all of your alveoli?, the little fucking airbags in your lungs, and I would just figure that you would pass out very quickly from that lack of oxygen and the fact that you’re working all of your insides.

            I know that speech works from the diaphragm and all that but fuck men vocal cords.

            When I did my cryo training, they made very clear that you had about two steps into an oxygen free room, and you were done.

      • s1gtrap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        At least one of them went “I don’t need guns, I need fire extinguishers!”

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I read about this and saw the censored version last night. I nearly threw up seeing the uncensored version now. I feel similar to you.

        And to all the shitheads on twitter downplaying this as “glorifying mental illness,” fuck the lot of them.

    • Nix@merv.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      He specifically livestreamed the video and sent links to the livestream and archive to various journalists and anarchist press so that the video would be shared and viewed. Its a disservice for it to be censored and weird that person also watermarked it with their @

      Uncensored version: (GRAPHIC VIDEO WARNING) https://x.com/v4p4l/status/1761995206465888567?s=46&t=xtlq_1V7eXJ31HI_SLdE9g It will likely be removed soon so download while you can if you think it deserves to be archived.

      Twitter is terrible so heres an upload on archive.org that has a torrent and driect download https://archive.org/download/rpreplay-final-1708967255

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because it is censored, more people will see it and more people will get the message so I disagree with you but I see your point.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          literally the entire point behind this act is it being explicitly graphic, sharing the uncensored version quite literally goes against that. It’s almost as bad as censoring the message from the get go, except now we’re actively disrespecting his intention.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think the graphic nature can be shared while also censoring the gore. It’s not like it changes the events in any way.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              you can also do what this post and basically every article did, and then post a single frame of the video. No blurring needed, no graphic content explicitly posted.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I really debated if I wanted to see this, I thought didn’t need to get what he did. Let me tell you watching it made me sick to the stomach and made it much much more real than just knowing what did in text.

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    9 months ago

    He was too innocent for this world. I don’t know what to say other than I promise I will never forget him and that I’ll try to spread his message and do everything I can to help free Palestine.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      9 months ago

      He is the fiery monk of our time. I watched the video below and I will admit after the second “Free Palestine” and the screaming started, I had to turn the sound off until he fell and I suspected the screaming stopped.

      He is braver and has more strength than anyone on the Israeli side. I won’t forget that this hero couldn’t stay silent in the face of genocide.

    • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      He’s like the third guy to do this in a year, big money doesn’t want you to know about it

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    9 months ago

    The pigs shouting “ON THE GROUND” to a person who is actively burning to death have got to be the finest example of cop brain. Everything’s a threat.

    I kind of wish this troop would have done something like sabotage or leaked Intel like Chelsea Manning, but I’m also not gonna deny the bravery involved. Free Palestine. Death to America.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 months ago

    This guy is very brave, but everyone taking about the embassy security drawing weapons when they arrive. Of course they would. They don’t know what was planned, if it was a suicide bombing gone wrong, our whatever else. I’m not pro cop but I don’t understand why people are surprised by this. They are security

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Sure, maybe if they drew their weapons immediately, before his act. That’d make sense. They wouldn’t know what he was gonna do.

      The trouble is, based on the reporting we have, they drew their guns after he lit himself on fire, not before:

      as soon as he was engulfed in flames they started yelling at him to get down on the ground. They even drew their guns on the burning man before someone pushed them to get fire extinguishers to extinguish the fire.

      I’m thinking by the time the guy was engulfed in flames he was a little too preoccupied to do much else.

      Can you imagine facing a living bonfire, and your first thought is “I should draw my gun and tell them to get down on the ground”? There’s genuinely no excuse for that level of inhumanity.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If your job is to secure the embassy/ site/ scene you work down a list. They clearly followed the list.

        We now know that he was no risk, but they couldn’t.

        They aren’t equipped with fire extinguishers (aside from the guy who got one), so are you assuming they should jump on him? Smother a fuel fire with their bodies? Does that secure the site? No. It’s also not realistic.

        Seems like securing the site then 1 person getting a fire extinguisher is a completely responsible response.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          9 months ago

          He’d already fallen down and stopped screaming when they drew on him. What threat would he pose that a gun was going to solve at that time? Before you say bomb, think carefully about what a gun was going to do in that circumstance.

          No, this was an example (once again) that “try to kill anything you don’t immediately understand” is the default condition of our law enforcement. Last week’s example was an acorn, and a very, very lucky handcuffed man in the back of a police cruiser.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            This is not the acorn thing at all. They are trained to secure the embassy and they did that.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                I ignored it because it’s irrelevant. You’re applying a subjective value assessment to professionals following training. It’s ugly, but it’s not meant to be “nice” or compassionate. They are there to protect the embassy

                • zaphod@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I ignored it because it’s irrelevant.

                  You ignored the context and circumstances because they’re irrelevant?

                  Your answer to every comment has consistently been (paraphrasing): “trust the cops, they know what they’re doing”, irrespective of any surrounding facts that might suggest otherwise, or any past history that would suggest that law enforcement doesn’t deserve that level of blind trust.

                  Given that, there’s little point in further discussion.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I just want to know what they were going to prevent with guns, given he was immobilized and not even screaming anymore in addition to being engulfed in flames. You seem to have all the answers, so I’m sure there must be something dangerous he could have done at that point which could have been stopped by a gun - please just tell me what it was.

      • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        9 months ago

        Stop him before he got any closer to the embassy. Obviously a gun won’t stop him from commiting suicide, but it could easily be the difference between one person dying and a much larger act of terrorism

          • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Considering the security forces had no idea whether he was working alone or what was happening, they obviously didn’t think they could rely on the metal fence.

            Look, I’m all for a free Palestine and I agree that what is happening in Gaza is a genocide. I also think that voluntary membership in any American or Israeli law enforcement makes them complicit in the heinous acts perpetrated by American cops and the IDF, respectively. I don’t know you, but I’d guess that you and I agree a lot more than we disagree on these issues. I’m just saying, from the PoV of the security forces at the Israeli embassy, this was a potential threat to the embassy and their job is literally to prevent threats from harming the embassy. Without any further information to go on, their decision to draw guns first and get the extinguisher second is reasonable.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              If he wasn’t alone what would shooting him accomplish? You still haven’t actually presented a compelling reason he needed to be kept under a gun.

              I think it’s understandable that people untrained for a situation like this would fall back on the default, I know I wouldn’t know what to do, but calling that “reasonable” as if it really makes sense in hindsight is a stretch.

              • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                If he wasn’t alone what would shooting him accomplish? You still haven’t actually presented a compelling reason he needed to be kept under a gun.

                Once Bushnell was on fire and had stopped moving toward the gate/fence, you are correct, he didn’t need to be kept under a gun. However, if he had started to move in a threatening way or if he had been working with a larger group, having the guns drawn could have saved crucial seconds if someone else began to act in a threatening way. The security forces simply didn’t know what the fuck was happening, and in that situation, it is better to have the guns drawn and to be ready for the worst case scenario.

                I think it’s understandable that people untrained for a situation like this would fall back on the default, I know I wouldn’t know what to do, but calling that “reasonable” as if it really makes sense in hindsight is a stretch.

                That’s fair. I can get behind calling it “understandable” instead of “reasonable”

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Shoot the suicide bomber before a bigger boom. What if there was another person? Another thing? We can’t know, they can’t know. We know now, due to hindsight.

        They are security. They secure scenes. They aren’t paramedics.

        I am not making pro cop statements here, but all the comments about “ohhh the cop arrived to a dangerous scene with a weapon drawn!” Is like saying “the garbage man picked up the garbage bin when he drove past my house!” Duh!

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          He’s on fire! Shooting him wouldn’t stop a bigger boom!

          I’ll give the cops this: they probably were not trained on what to do if someone lights themselves on fire. They just fell back on basic training.

    • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well yeah I’m not surprised that cops are not there to protect average people and provide them safety, they’re there to protect private property.

        • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Secures the embassy from a man caught on fire (very capable!) and is outside its fence. Could you imagine what would’ve happened if they weren’t there? Yeah, still no threat to the embassy :)

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I see one seeming to be getting medical equipment while one secures the scene. seems very professional.

            Did you want to find another screenshot?

            I’m not being pro cop here, I’m being anti assuming cops will be helpful buddies when you do things near an embassy. in an era of mass shooters and all sorts of public violence it’s no surprise that agents of the state be state agents

            • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Someone had to yell “fire extinguisher not guns!” for them to even consider doing anything other than raise guns at a burning man.

              I’m being anti assuming cops will be helpful buddies when you do things near an embassy.

              That is the point I make. Never trust cops. They will rarely ever be helpful.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                And as I’ve argued/miscommunicated with folks a few times here: they aren’t expected to be so. They aren’t there to help. They are there to secure the embassy