Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
W_oOo_ke_3333@lemmy.today to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前

Thank you American software

fedia.io

message-square
131
fedilink
742

Thank you American software

fedia.io

W_oOo_ke_3333@lemmy.today to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前
message-square
131
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    2 年前

    A true patriot supports local spyware!

    • Olivia@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 年前

      Please log my IP address. This is a house that loves Managed Democracytm

      • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 年前

        Please log my IP address.

        127.0.0.1

        Checkmate. We’re watching you.

        • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 年前

          lol I started DDoSing this losers IP address, good op sec dumba

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 年前

            holdon i have connection issues

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          laughs in ipv6-only network

          Find me now!

        • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 年前

          Haha you’re wrong! My IP address is actually 192.168.2.1

      • objectionist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        democracy officers would be proud

    • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      I guess your world is only black and white ay?

      • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        They are being sarcastic.

    • caveman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Hahahahahah

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 年前

    This forced sale of TikTok for national security is a farce because they were already forced to move their service to the US on an American-owned hosting provider, and they have already put people with a history of aligning with “American interests” into executive positions, like CEO Shou Zi Chew and vice president Michael Beckerman. I think the US “intelligence community” already has everything it needs to monitor and control TikTok.

    • BaroqueInMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      I have a geoIP alias on my firewall and can still see TikTok sending telemetry to a Chinese CDN.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 年前

        If so, then maybe the US “intelligence community” doesn’t actually see that as a problem, despite the cold war propaganda.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Removed by mod

        • Diotima@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 年前

          Removed by mod

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 年前

            Anglo in the sense of the Anglosphere, I think: Five Eyes. Five Eyes in basically the inner core of the imperial core.

            • Diotima@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 年前

              Removed by mod

    • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 年前

      It doesn’t matter where the servers are located physically but who can access the data that’s on them

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 年前

        They were physically relocated to the US so that the US can access the data, as people like Edward Snowden and Mark Klein have shown us. I’m sure the US knows precisely what data is and isn’t being sent to China.

  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 年前

    I don’t discriminate. I say the data protection of all of these services is terrible and you shouldn’t use them.

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      I think users should embrace data harvesting and passively run chatGPT powered bots to generate more mindless data

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Is there some way to trick the chatgpt training bots by intentionally mislabeling data? Like can I upload some furry pornography tasteful erotica and label it “AP US history assignment - Civil War”?

    • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      deleted by creator

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 年前

    23andMe is much, much worse than the others due to the nature of the data it sells.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 年前

      Also, you don’t actually need to share your own data to be vulnerable. Some stupid relative sharing their genetic information is enough to have some ideas about you. I’m fortunate that it’s hasn’t caught on in my home country.

      • MBM@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        I feel like caring about heritage in this way is a pretty North-American (or maybe immigrant country in general) thing in the first place

        • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 年前

          My family won’t like the fact they’re not pure. Best not to kick that hornet’s nest.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      How do you mean?

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 年前

        I consider your personal genetic data to be a much more dangerous thing to sell, at least in the long term, compared to browser history.

        • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 年前

          Even if the corporation that holds onto the genetic data isn’t selling it for profit (which I doubt), they still likely have terrible security on their servers. How many data breaches have there been over the years?

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 年前

          I think it’s arguable. You can control thought with algorithms and feed addictions with browsing history. Both are still dangerous if abused.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          Oh right. I forgot what 23&me was

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 年前

    Removed by mod

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Removed by mod

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Source: Trust me bro [1]

        [1] I don’t like people who look different from me.

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 年前

          Ahhh, typical Hexbear, jumping to the conclusion that I am racist because I said TikTok is bad without any citations. See the other reply in the thread for the citations.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 年前

            TikTok is not the only company that uses its pixels throughout the internet. The report found Google, Meta and Microsoft, among others, use these trackers.

            Your first link has a sentence expressly disproving your own thesis, so in addition to concluding you are a racist, I can also now conclude that you didn’t read your own sources.

            • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 年前

              Justifying their attacks with claims of superiority, defending the obvious contradictions with equivalence. Classic motte and bailley.

            • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 年前

              I never said the other companies don’t also track you outside of the app.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                2 年前

                TikTok, regardless of the country of origin, is known to be spyware on a much greater level than everything else on this list.

          • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 年前

            Removed by mod

            • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 年前

              I’m not trying to openly lie. If you have any evidence that any of the other platforms are expressly worse than TikTok for privacy, please show me.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                2 年前

                Goalpost shifting, your original post said that TikTok is known to be spyware on a much greater level than anything else on this list.

                Your statement isn’t true even if you prove that Tiktok is the worst offender on the list. You need to prove that Tiktok is worse to a much higher degree than anything else on that list. Your own source straight out says that at least 3 of the other companies on the list engage in similar practices.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Sure, here are some sources:

        https://abcnews.go.com/Business/tiktok-data-app-report/story?id=97913249

        https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-data-privacy/

        https://www.wsj.com/video/series/inside-tiktoks-highly-secretive-algorithm/investigation-how-tiktok-algorithm-figures-out-your-deepest-desires/6C0C2040-FF25-4827-8528-2BD6612E3796

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 年前

          From the very first link:

          TikTok is not the only company that uses its pixels throughout the internet. The report found Google, Meta and Microsoft, among others, use these trackers.

          Rigorous scholarship there, champ.

        • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          Removed by mod

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 年前

      Yeah I remember when TikTok was first getting popular in the States, and some reverse engineer I followed on Twitter posted his findings about it, and it was honestly pretty terrifying. Like unfettered access to your device, regardless of permissions granted, and remote code execution capabilities kind of terrifying. I don’t think Spotify does that lmao

      • caveman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 年前

        This mean android permissions don’t work and a Google should be hold accountable also

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Removed by mod

    • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 年前

      Nothing beats Instagram, Facebook, Google, Microsoft or Twitter in spyware. Have you heard of the Snowden revelations? These companies provide all their data to US spies.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Removed by mod

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        https://lemmy.zip/comment/8340091

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          Removed by mod

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 年前

    How come every thread I see about this topic, there is nobody who is concerned about letting the federal government dictate which apps you can and cannot use to communicate with other people? This is some 1984 shit.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 年前

      deleted by creator

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 年前

        If it’s really about the military as you suggest then the extremely easy solution is to order service members not to use Tik Tok.

        Passing a specific law to compell the sale of one specific company is arguably some sort of Bill of Attainder, which I’m sure ByteDance’s lawyers will be argueing as soon as Biden’s pen touches paper.

        • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 年前

          deleted by creator

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 年前

            Most of those bans are organizations saying that employees can’t install TikTok on organization issued phones and computers, which is not at all comparable to an overall ban? My work doesn’t allow me to play video games on work computers or drink on work property, but that’s not at all the same as a law banning all video games and alcohol.

            Look at the Russian propaganda war in e.g. Germany, that shit can have a negative effect on the defensive abilities of a nation.

            Yeah one problem with human and civil rights is that they tend to have negative effects on the defensive abilities of a nation. War would be so much easier if you could just arrest all the peace protestors, or hold suspected enemy agents without trial, or force people to work without pay in defence industries, or force women to give birth to more people so you can conscript more soldiers.

            So let’s just do away with free speech and habeus corpus, reinstitute slave labor and force women to pop out lots of kids. Then Germany can defend itself again, just like the last two times.

            • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 年前

              deleted by creator

      • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        Well, you can expect China doing the same. This kind of behaviour triggers retalliation.

        • solarvector@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 年前

          You might look into the apps they have already banned.

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 年前

            The current situation over in China still allows internet users to easily access services like Facebook or YouTube through VPNs, it was more of a measure of digital protectionism to allow local development of IT companies, online business, etc. If China wants to do similar censorship in response to these measure, they very well could still crack down on VPNs.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 年前

            They were blocking the bulk of the internet via their great firewall before mobile apps were even a thing

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 年前

    I would say make laws about data collection, usage, etc. instead of banning TikTok.

    Heck, fix more important problems like income disparity, hunger, homelessness, healthcare, our wasteful spending, so many things more important and yet we’re wasting time on TikTok.

    I don’t think people think this is a good use of time.

    Seriously, it’s government overreach and ignoring freedom of speech, etc.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      We can agree that there is at least a slight difference in having your own (or a friendly nation’s) Government tracking you, versus allowing a competing nation to have direct access to over half of the adult US population (as per their recent push-notification stunt), as well as a robust collection of their interests and preferences.

      There is a reason China has banned most US-based software in the mainland (Meta, Google, etc.); in favour of self-developed alternatives. This is just treatment in kind; it’s not an outright ban, rather a forced sale to prevent more of that user data falling into dubious hands.

      • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        I’m not really ok with that type of anti other country behavior in (edit to add the word: almost) any case. Heck, I want cheap Chinese EV options in the US too.

        Make government (and other) tracking opt-out-able by law. That is the law we need. Not this bs version.

        This current bill literally sounds like it’s written by American companies to squash a foreign competition. You know Facebook, YouTube, etc. are biting at the teeth for more users (and ad revenue) of short form content; especially if TikTok users scattered to other platforms.

        Once again: give users the freedom to chose what they want. This is a government overreach.

      • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 年前

        Yes, there is a difference. Having your own government spy on you is way worse because it has the monopoly on violence over you. No one protects you from that. But your government will (try to) protect you from foreign influences.

        There is a reason for the outrage when PRISM came out of the closet.

        • threshold_dweller@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 年前

          But your government will (try to) protect you from foreign influences.

          Oh, like stopping a forogn government from influencing people through a popular app. huh. Good point.

          • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 年前

            Yes, my point is in this scenario there is a heavy hitter (government) on your site, which makes it a better sutuation than to let your government just prey on you.

            Although I would put this under the “try to” category. In my opinion it’s way better to regulate methods rather than names. Then again I would not know how to implement this thought in this scenario.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          But your government will (try to) protect you from foreign influences That’s what this is, though.

          Take a step back and consider for a moment the absolute mayhem TikTok was able to cause through one single push notification to their US user base (>170m, over half the adult population). That is not a power that should be wielded lightly, and definitely not one in the hands of a foreign adversary ready, willing and capable of weaponising it at their whim.

          Think of the power that affords them to put their finger on the scale when it comes to the critical upcoming Presidential election, not just directly - but through slight manipulations of the algorithm to engage one political cohort and disenfranchise another.

          • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 年前

            My point was that there is some institution on your site of that standoff. This will not be the case if you have to fight against your own government. So it’s better to have to fight a foreign government, rather than one’s own.

            TikTok is a dangerous influence, yes. I wasn’t trying to argue against that. But then, so are Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Twitter and similar social media. Maybe even all social media.

            Other than fighting with shortsighted regulations I don’t know how one would fight such an influence other than widespread education of the people. But that would make them more resilient against any propaganda.

        • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 年前

          because it has the monopoly on violence over you

          I’ve been hearing this one going for a while, where does it come from? Sounds like a corpofascist slogan.

          • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 年前

            Probably a bad translation from German. Maybe a better translation would be “force” instead of “violence”. It means only the police is allowed to use force.

            • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 年前

              Still can’t understand the point of it. Like, is the state ordering that civilians must be defenseless in the face of crime, for example? But yeah in general it just sounds like the usual “I am the Senate” fascist kind of takeover and control of power.

              • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 年前

                It means pretty much that, I would say. The reasoning is that in the case of a conflict you have to solve it by involving police and advocacies ( I think this is the right word ). The senate is only involved in setting the ground rules for the conflict in front of a judge.

                Of course, there is stuff like self defense (so one is not completely defenseless), but anything like revenge is heavily pursued.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        There is a reason China has banned most US-based software in the mainland

        I’m not at all saying what the USA is doing is right, but I find it hilarious Beijing is upset about it.

        “It’s only OK when we do it!!!”

  • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 年前

    “we will harvest your DNA and put a literal implant into your brain” melon-musk

    so-true

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    Spying on user data is a constitutional right of US companies, what are the poor going to live on when they can’t traffic with your data, or when a disgusting red communist company steals their bread? A little more proper patriotism, guys. Bad enough that the EU is cutting the wings of this companies, therefore also don’t use EU apps to make America great again.

  • BaldProphet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    US companies != US federal government

    • admin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 年前

      US federal gov already got their hand in companies ass.

      • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        reverse order

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      At first I thought you were being serious, but I think this is a joke? That Americans don’t care how many companies spy on them as long as it’s not the government?

      Which, is laughable because of course the government has contacts at everyone one of these companies and they’d gladly hand over your data then go to court to protect it

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 年前

        Removed by mod

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          This is sort of true, though it’s hard to make a clear distinction between US capitalists and the US government when the capitalists control the government, and have since the 1776 bourgeois revolution.

          China is a proletarian state, where the capitalist class is not in control: China’s housing minister says real estate developers must go bankrupt if necessary

          Whereas the US is a bourgeois state, where the capitalist class is in control.

          • BaldProphet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 年前

            Removed by mod

            • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 年前

              Removed by mod

              • threshold_dweller@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 年前

                Removed by mod

        • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 年前

          It should be a known fact at this point that US companies share all the data the goverment wants, i don’t think the greater influence matters in this case.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      Ever heard about CLOUD act?

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      All of the US corporate social media platforms are part of the US military-industrial-intellegence complex. Look at their boards of directors and executives. Look at the Twitter Files. Look Hamilton 68.

      Look at Reddit:

      • Facebook Partners With Hawkish Atlantic Council, a NATO Lobby Group, to “Protect Democracy”
      • Jessica Ashooh: The taming of Reddit and the National Security State Plant tabbed to do it
      • A Reddit AMA Claiming To Be A Uyghur Quickly Exposes A CIA Asset Slandering China
      • r/neoliberal was created by a neoliberal think tank » BPR Interviews: The Neoliberal Project

      .

      They have their eye on the fediverse now as well: Atlantic Council » Collective Security in a Federated World

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 年前

        You’re also misunderstanding. I won’t deny that US companies seek profit wherever they can, even from unethical sources. I also don’t doubt their involvement with law enforcement and intelligence agencies. But a company seeking profit through a partnership with the United States federal government is not the same as the totalitarian Chinese government requiring oversight of Chinese companies.

        It might not seem like a big difference to you, but it’s an important one to me.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 年前

          If you find it upsetting that the Chinese state imposes its will on the Chinese capitalist class, then you must really like capitalism, where the capitalist class imposes its will on the state.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      Chinese companies != Chin…wait.

    • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      deleted by creator

      • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        Removed by mod

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 年前

    Spottily is a Swedish company

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 年前

      Sweden is not an adversary of the United States.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Removed by mod

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 年前

        Op is just thanking the wrong country.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      Came here to say this

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Removed by mod

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    deleted by creator

    • W_oOo_ke_3333@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Removed by mod

  • isthereanyseal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 年前

    Isn’t spotify European?

    • othon_xxd@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      No, owned by Meta aka Facebook

      • isthereanyseal@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Well actually IS mostly owned by europe entitities and individual shareholders. Only the founders and some europe capital mamooths had +50% of it

  • caveman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 年前

    Just install an alternative app Store like Aurora or install it directly from TikTok sites.

    For open source projects, you can also use Obtainium or F-Droid

    • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      Oh really? This ban won’t effect people who use (for example) F-Droid to get the app?? That’s great to hear tbh. Hopefully this stupid ass decision will have the effect of turning more people on to FOSS stuff more than it will actually prevent people from using TikTok.

      • caveman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        I don’t think they will put it on fdroid, because it has to really be open source to be there, but there’s certainly other app stores which will have it.

        How can a ban be enforced? It’s always thru Google app Store or IP, and you can always bypass both.

        In Aurora Store there’s TikTok. You can install aurora store here:

        https://aurorastore.org/

        In Worst case you can try finding the official tiktok .APK install somewhere

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          It’s really hard to bypass ip bans. Tik tok in India has been non existent since the ban.

          • caveman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 年前

            You can use VPN (paid or free) for instance and if the ban is really badly done even by changing the DNS server (which is free) access can be restored.

            • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 年前

              Nope. You can’t access tiktok through vpn in India. You need a patched/modded app. I live in India and I’ve tried doing that. It’s a non-existent platform here. Bans will affect user engagement.

              • caveman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 年前

                As a curiosity: how do the system know if you are in India? You said VPN doesn’t work so it’s not thru IP address. What’s it then?

        • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          ok, thanks for the info. I don’t know a lot about how this kind of thing works (clearly), I just try to use and support FOSS and “piracy” whenever possible.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Aurora displays currently no app, be it anonymous or with login. Anyone knows why? I need it to reinstall my banking access app, dammit.

      • caveman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        Aurora sometimes malfunctions. Try reinstalling it

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          Thanks, i use APKupdater for now.

  • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 年前

    This meme is a bit dishonest because its about Chinese government harvesting this data not about companies harvesting it. Both are bad but ones substantially worse.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 年前

      Yeah, if China wants the data of Americans they should buy it from American companies, not harvest it themselves.

      They’re not mad about leaking data, they’re mad that China is drinking their milkshake.

    • SleepyWheel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 年前

      American companies have way more power over my life than the Chinese government

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      The bill actually addresses any foreign adversary.

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 885 users / day
  • 2.29K users / week
  • 4.31K users / month
  • 12K users / 6 months
  • 624 local subscribers
  • 56.9K subscribers
  • 16.6K Posts
  • 345K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org