• Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think there’s a lot of research on it, but it’s a way to measure aphantasia, the inability to picture something in your mind. I’m a 4 and didn’t actually know anything higher existed until I started talking to other artists.

  • 🐋 Color 🍁 ♀@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m a 1. I was today years old when I learned that there are people who can only visualize the outline of an apple, nothing at all, or anything other than a fully 3D rendered apple like in a computer generated image. To answer your question, no I don’t!

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember when I learned people weren’t just being metaphorical when they talked about “picturing” something in their mind.

      Do you have an internal dialogue? Or is it all visual? Cuz my internal world is basically a lightly illustrated book, 95% dialogue and occasionally I can imagine a vague image.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remember when I learned people weren’t just being metaphorical when they talked about “picturing” something in their mind.

        I had that same reaction. “You mean you can see it? No like, really see it, not just think about seeing it? What the fuck?”

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I can see it, separate it into parts, rotate it around, put it back together, etc etc. I design things entirely in my head visually before actually building them. I assume that’s how most engineers/artists operate.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah, I’ve always been a shit artist for I assume the opposite reason; I can think of a thing in a macro sense, like "I want to draw [thing], it has these features’, but when it comes time to actually draw those features, I can’t pinpoint exactly what they look like. It’s like reading a few sentence description of a tree, and then trying to draw one purely based on that description - you can get a general sense for what it looks like, but not the fine detail needed to accurately represent one visually.

            Incidentally, I have a difficult time commissioning art as a result, because I have an idea of what I want, but I have a hard time communicating the finer details. AI generated art has actually been really helpful for me in this regard; I can see something and know if it’s what I want or not, so being able to give an AI art generator a broad description and get back 100 images from which I can pick a few and tell an artist which parts of each one I want has made it much easier.

        • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          When i zone out, i can have full conversations with people ive never met in my mind while walking to work.

          Basically flying blind through traffic, unless something relevant registers on my “conscious” mind.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s funny, really, because aphantasia is supposed to be fairly rare, but every time a thread like this comes up, folks come out of the woodwork saying “Oh, yeah, that’s me.” Makes me wonder if it isn’t a lot more common than believed, but people just don’t realize they have it. There don’t seem to have been any real studies done on it.

            I can have conversations in my mind, but there’s no visuals associated with it. It’s like a radio broadcast vs. a TV program. I can think about the description of an object, and recite back its physical qualities, but I can’t visualize that object at all.

          • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            These conversations that never happened don’t always go well, so I whish I could have less of them.

            • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Same same, i try to be aware of it and ground myself when i do catch it drift into just verbalising anxiety with no real benefit.

              Especially when i should be enjoying reality instead, like during a movie, concert or hike

      • 🐋 Color 🍁 ♀@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Both internal dialogue which sounds the same as my spoken voice alongside images or videos, similar to when there’s a montage being narrated in a movie is the best way I can explain it. This is all fascinating to me now! Do you dream very often?

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I only seem to dream if I’m not sleeping well. I can pretty reliably make myself dream by having coffee before bed. Otherwise, nope, there’s just a vague sense that time has passed when I wake up. If I do dream it’s highly visual, though.

          • anguo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            You only remember your dreams when sleeping lightly. You most likely still dream.

      • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can create images, sounds, smells, etc the whole gaumut experience OF an apple in my mind. I almost always go for visual it made up in my mind. Just depends.

        Not the person you were asking, but seems like you’re curious.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m a 2 on the scale unless i try (I can do 1 but it’s not fast or easy for complex things).

        Visualization isn’t usually an active thing for me. But when you say “think of a car accident” I can visualize one generic car t-boning another on a generic road. If you ask me to describe a room in my house I visualize most of the things there and described based off that visualization.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m a 3 for memories, a 4 for everything else. Before my head injury I was a 5 for everything (no idea what that’s about lol)

          I can describe a car accident in great detail and draw a picture of it, but in my brain I’m just verbally describing the car accident to myself as if I’m the narrator.

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        For me when I’m daydreaming it’s like watching a movie, my eyes might be open but I don’t see shit, my brain’s doing other things. Or when I’m visualizing something it’s like free and organic AR. But yeah, no dialogue necessary, it’s like a hallucination that I control.

      • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        How do you think quickly if you need to say everything in your mind? Is the voice very quick?

        It’s also unfathomable to me how people can think of what they need to do tomorrow and not see it.

        I just think we don’t understand our own internal processes very well. The conscious part may come long after we had the thought and if you say it or see it doesn’t matter.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          How do you think quickly if you need to say everything in your mind? Is the voice very quick?

          Pretty quick, yeah. It’s basically my voice, but also, I don’t need to breathe or move my mouth or anything. Ever heard the term “stream of consciousness”? Also, grammar and punctuation aren’t necessary, I can just talktalktalktalktalk and I understand myself because I always know what I’m saying.

          I’m sure if you could listen to my thoughts it would sound like a fucking mess tho lol

          But also, there’s a difference between when I’m just thinking about stuff to myself and when I’m busy doing something. If I’m in a flow state or “in the zone”, I don’t necessarily monologue everything I’m doing. I just do it, y’know? It’s only when I slow down to think that my thoughts actually become dialogue again.

          It’s also unfathomable to me how people can think of what they need to do tomorrow and not see it.

          I can’t imagine why you need to see it! I know I need to lay some mulch on my garden tomorrow, I don’t need to visualize that? I can just make a mental note of it and keep that thought stored away as part of a to-do list. What would I even use pictures for when I can just tell myself “I need to do X, Y, and Z”?

          I just think we don’t understand our own internal processes very well. The conscious part may come long after we had the thought and if you say it or see it doesn’t matter.

          Well yeah, consciousness is an illusion. I think they’ve demonstrated with active brain scans that our conscious thoughts come after we’ve already made subconscious decisions. We make up our minds before we know it, consciousness is more like a way we convince ourselves to do the things we’ve already decided we want to do.

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      right, coz there’s no point if you can make better images in your head, yeah?

      you don’t run into problems like awful actors, or they suddenly introduce a fetish you’re not into

      is that about right?

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s like saying there’s no point in having sex with other people because you know how best to touch yourself.

        • leavemealone@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You are totally on point, to answer op and staying in topic, that’s like the difference between wanking and being wanked, both will get you there but being passive and enjoying new things is always nice. It’s not because you can visualize it that you can think of it. Moreover I have great spatial and detailed mind visualization but I have trouble with faces. As an example I can visualize myself navigating in streets and places, I can rotate objects in my mind and other stuff, but faces are hard for me, like reading in a dream . In real life too I have a bad faces recognition/memory.

        • froh42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree with the last statement at about a 70% level. The last 30% missing is - like you can’t tickle yourself, there’s some sensations that are different just because another person does them to you.

          I’m not anti relationship, it’s just when viewing sex alone a lot of the things I experienced with someone else are just overrated. With very very few exceptions when I met humans with extremely high emotional intelligence.

          But maybe in the end that’s all a discussion, that we all are generally bad in knowing and communicating what feels good for each other.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I introduce another option, as I’m much more detailed than even “1.” I can visualise entire scenes with the background and all, along with other sensory experiences such as touch, taste, and smell with complete realism. Very useful being in engineering. I do watch the referenced content, but it’s more to “enrich the dataset” so to speak, just for inspiration and to provide more details to imagine later. Sometimes I’ll just turn it off and go with the fantasy instead.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      In my case, it’s not exactly like an outline, it’s just… I can’t describe it because I can’t actually focus on it, it’s like a cross between a picture and a notion. But somehow, in the lineup, the outline seems like the most accurate level of detail.

      Also color is absent for me, don’t know about for others.

  • DeadWorld@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m a 1 and yes I do. I can imagine something, but it’s hard to concentrate on something super detailed and fully enjoy myself

  • Christian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m looking through this thread and the concept behind the picture is 100x more fascinating to me than the actual question. Is the number your maximum capability?

    I’d estimate I go through the majority (90℅?) of each day at like a 4 bordering on 5, but at times I’ll move up to 2. It’s a pretty seamless transition, I don’t really have an explanation for why it only happens every so often. It’s not like it’s exclusively reserved for moments where it’s more useful.

    • AdNecrias@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t expect people who can vividly imagine to be doing it all the time, kinda interpreted this as a cap. Still 1-2 distinction seems odd to me. Is it cartoon to realistic?

      • Moghul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        If I’m picturing anything, I usually go for 1 or 2. The difference might be in the amount of time I do it. I can just do it quick, then remember it.

  • RyanLiu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m a 1, and yes I watch porn to collect “materials” to concoct the most perfect porn in my head that no one has seen and will never see.

    • lyth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s meant to roughly gauge how clearly you picture things in your mind’s eye by asking you which apple you see when prompted to imagine one. #5 references the lack of a mind’s eye in people with Aphantasia (coincidentally this Wikipedia article has this same chart as a header image)

  • Luna@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    TIL about aphantasia

    Anyways, I’m between 1 - 2, and I just wanted to say that just bc I can visualize things in my head doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy seeing things with my eyes. If I was good at drawing, I definitely would draw my OCs and such

    But no, I don’t watch adult videos. I just don’t really like nsfw. Maybe I’m asexual or smt, idk

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m 1 and watch every day, though i read many books too, so everything balances out, also my work requires a lot of improvisation that makes you think on problem solving, so positive impact is bigger

  • moonlight@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m between 4 and 5, and no, I don’t need to. I can conceptualize things pretty well, I just can’t do it visually.

    • meanmon13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      TIL some people can visualize but it’s in black & white or devoid of color all together.

      For me, I can visualize things from 2 up to entire scenes. I don’t “see” it like with my eyes, it’s like a dream, sometimes a vivid dream.

      • LittleBorat2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I could dream up a scene right now involving me buying 20 photorealistic apples in a store I often go to. I thought this is normal and everyone does that.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I was a 5 before my head injury, now I think I’m a 3 if I close my eye and really focus on it.

    But also? I’ve liked adult literature the entire time. “Visualization” is overrated.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        I couldn’t visualize even slightly before! Total aphantasia.

        Now if I focus really hard I can briefly see images and memories. It still doesn’t come naturally but the difference is staggering.

    • moonlight@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wow, care to tell more about what that was like? I’m aphantasic, and the idea of suddenly unlocking the ability to visualize is fascinating to me.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s like, sometimes, if I really focus on a memory then I can start to fill in 3D space and contrasts of light/dark and especially faces. I can’t visualize color or really texture, but everything else comes to me. It takes a lot of focus and doesn’t come naturally though!

        I still mostly don’t visualize stuff, but sometimes a vision will strike me out-of-the-blue when I’m reminded of it. Weird.