Basically a repost pf things I said in the mega, but anecdotally I’m hearing that sales of fiction read by men are dropping precipitously, and English and literature classes in colleges are now dominated by women. It seems like young men are not being exposed to literature in the same way that they used to. Like, when I was in high school and college, you could be a “bro” kind of guy and read Chuck Palahniuk, or Hunter S. Thompson, or David Foster Wallace. For decades, authors like Hemmingway and Bukowski found receptive audiences in young men, not to mention all the crime fiction, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy that men have traditionally consumed. The “guy in your English class who loves David Foster Wallace” was a stereotype for a reason. I read in another thread that music is less culturally important to young men than it used to be. It seems like younger men just straight up see no value in reading literature or fiction, or exposing themselves or critically engaging with art and music, because the algorithms just railroad them into Alpha Gridset world.

Am I wrong about this? Am I being condescending and out of touch, or is this a real thing that’s happening, where the whole “male” culture is turning into grindset podcasts and streamers?

Edit: Okay, so the impression I’m getting is that everything is worse but also kind of the same as it ever was, which sounds right.

  • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t know if it’s attention spans or w/e but it does feel like fewer people of all generations are reading now, and when they do read, they just want slop. Anything that demands engagement or effort from the reader is denounced as ‘badly written’. It drives me a bit mad tbh, because at the same time that people smugly reject good literature, you can see that they’re unfulfilled reading the same old dreck for the millionth time.

    A common thing I used to see on Book Twitter was people complaining at the lack of beautifully written prose that focuses on the interior life and I just want to scream THAT’S MODERNISM YOU’RE DESCRIBING MODERNISM, READ THE WAVES, PLEASE READ THE WAVES, IT WILL MOVE YOU SO DEEPLY, but the thing is that while they want that, they also only read YA dystopian fiction written in the past simple as an iron rule.

    • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most conversations I have with people my age start with “I saw this Tiktok…”. Very dire. Don’t care if I sound like a cranky boomer.

        • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          Depends on the context really, but yeah, sometimes. I don’t mind any of it if other things get discussed, but it gets tiresome after a while.

        • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No one has ever been “i saw _____ on youtube” and it ever been anything morally good, very occasionally my IRL friend will reference a YT video essay or something, but otherwise it’s usually something frivolous (not necessarily bad) or some heinous culture war shit.

        • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Aren’t tiktoks necessarily like <60 seconds? That’s intentionally engineered to be more mindless than a YouTube at least has the potential to be. On the other hand, I hear on the news that the tiktoks are radicalizing the youths so I gotta give critical support.

          On the OTHER other hand, it’s an APP owl-pissed

          I also appreciate that tiktok seems to intentionally lower the barrier to entry by (so I’ve heard) showing new accounts’ videos to people, where youtube would bury them

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I only started using TikTok cause a cool commie I follow on YouTube posts exclusive (long-form) content on TikTok 🤷‍♂️

                And tbh I found many other cool commies on my FYP. Like the algorithm is much better than YouTube. YouTube will still from time to time suggest sigma grindset videos to me, or straight up fascist shit even. That has never happened on TikTok.

    • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      If something isn’t immediately understandable it’s “badly made”. This is true of software too. The term “user friendly” has come to mean “can a clueless new/prospective user pick this up and engage with it immediately?” less “Does this provide the experience existing users want to see?”

      • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh man don’t get me started. I’m so tired of Angry That The Terminal Even Exists Guy, and that’s before we even get to the co-optation of the concept of ‘accessibility’. NO, NOT BEING ARSED WITH LEARNING A DIFFERENT PARADIGM, WHILE UNDERSTANDABLE, IS NOT A DISABILITY

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      but the thing is that while they want that, they also only read YA dystopian fiction written in the past simple as an iron rule.

      I was watching a YouTube video yesterday tmaking fun of YA dystopian fiction and there were endless comments about how great the Hunger Games is. A lot of “Best book ever! Someday it will be seen as proper literature!” Granted, I haven’t read the book (only saw the movies), but it was Battle Royale in the future instead of the present day.

      I dunno. I want to let people enjoy things, but I also think a lot of this stuff is just shit. Battle Royale was already pulp, so Hunger Games being a copy is even more pulp. The same goes for 50 Shades of Gray being Twilight fan fiction turned into a whole series.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it a bad thing that Pangloss was what made me seriously question my own apathy and conformism? I can see why Candide is kinda slop but I think if everyone read Candide we’d have a lot more people interested in actually changing the world, IDK.

        • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not at all it had (if im understanding correctly) the same on me when i first read it in my teens. I genuinely thought pangloss was the bees knees

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Right, and I think that this idea of “the world is exactly as it ought to be” is just such an important tenet of liberalism (ironic since Voltaire is one of the most important thinkers behind liberalism, someone more educated on philosophy can probably explain the contradiction there) and I think that breaking out of that bliss is so important for building a pro-social worldview. A better world is actually possible!