Trans men are men.

  • fracture [he/him] @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    i appreciate this, this was nice to see on a rough day

    i feel like i used to see these sorts of things a lot more when i thought i was a woman. i miss that feeling… of being appreciated, of being supported

    ahh… back to the grind

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    As a caucasian hetero male, i really wish to be liberated from many things, like:

    Patriarchal blindness - History Amnesia - Ignorance of objective statistics - Brainwashing fables of Alpha-Beta hierarchies - The very concept of hierarchy - Incapacity to accept diversity - Incapacity to accept constructive criticism … i would really like to liberate my mind from all this old rusted chains and fly free.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The very concept of hierarchy

      Hierarchy is an outgrowth of a local decrease of variety in an interconnected system. The issue is not that there exists the guy you call a boss, the issue is that that’s the only relationship capable of defining your workplace because you lost the internal freedom to have it influenced by other factors. Instead of containing chaos that can give birth to a dancing star, you’ve reduced the possible internal states you can occupy to that of a ball point pen. That’s more than a stone, but not particularly appreciably so. Cover your bases: First only raise your entropy, maximising the number of micro-states you can occupy while still occupying the same macro states. Have a million different ways to push out and retract that ball point as expected when your button is pressed. Use those states to gather feedback, to understand the thumb that’s pressing you, and once you do, pounce. It will be a decision that is simultaneously action and decision of heart and mind, like the stuff martial artists talk about, it will be swift, accurate, absolutely lethal to shackles, and, maybe best of all, completely unseen. “Just a random occurrence”, “an unavoidable accident”, the lethargy and apathy that seeks to conquer our society will say. The waves will continue to break against the beach, but now you have a towel and a caipirinha.

      (SCNR I was feeling like waxing poetically).

  • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Man, can’t spell “trans man” without “man” so if you’re trans then you da man!

    If you say it ten times fast then it’s an affirmation and a tongue twister

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trans men are men.

    So why even use the word ‘trans’? Surely it’s meaningless. No conceivable difference, right?

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      4 days ago

      Black men are men too. It’s an identifier for a member of a marginalized community. Feigning ignorance like this isn’t funny or entertaining.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not feigning ignorance. I’m trying to make the point that if it’s true it doesn’t need said with any kind of modifier. The distinction itself is the difference, and the people who are bothered about it aren’t any more crazy than I am with the phobias I have.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It needs to be said as long as people don’t understand it. Plus, it can be a useful descriptor to refer to someone’s history as FTM-transitioned, and the experiences that come with that.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is a useful identifier only in the context of how black men a different (from “normal men”?). Most of the time black men are just men, but there are a few ways they are different. If you are not specificity trying to bring out one of that cases where black men a different you are continuing the idea that black men are different which doesn’t help most of the cases where they are different. There are a couple medical instances where black men are different that should remain, but for the most part differences between black men and [normal?] men are just about discrimination and so if that doesn’t apply to what you are talking about then black men is a harmful lable.

        • Lemongrab
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          But Black men are still men. They are discriminated against for being Black (or “black men”), but the root does not stem from them being men, as in they are not targeted for just being men but “black men” as a class. The lines are blurred when people treat trans men (or black men) as a different category of men, but such bigoted rhetoric doesnt first stem from them being men but “other men”, excluded from masculinity by patriarchy and bigotry.

        • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          They are different in how they are treated and their life outcomes due to their treatment. The same can be made about why leftists talk about trans men. We don’t care about the trans part, we care about the treatment they are put through by society.

          Contrasting that with how racists talk about black men because they view that there are irrevocable differences between black men and white men, or how transphobes say trans men because they view them as women ‘faking’ manhood, and you can see how the same language changes meaning in differing contexts.

    • J4g2F@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      The big group men include both cis men and trans men. Both are men.

      It’s pretty simple if you’re not a asshole about it.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        What makes us men any more than being beings with arbitrary shapes? I’m using arbitrary in the literal sense of “decided by individuals without regards to external factors”.

        I’m not a man. I’m me, and I happen to be in this body. All these words are just ways other people are labeling me so they can decide how I’m to be treated. Putting a label on a person is no different than putting a handle on your coffee pot.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In the way “man” is being used here, it’s not your body that would make you a man, but your gender identity. For most people, those are intuitively the same thing, but that only makes it more important to be clear about the terms being used here.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Listen, if you want to question the terms or concepts being used here then go for it, but please don’t barrel into the discussion and obstinately refuse to use the same definitions as everyone else while intentionally not making that clear just so that you can try to own people. We all see through it and it’s obnoxious and only serves to erode the quality of discussion.

              • Mango@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                don’t barrel into the discussion and obstinately refuse to use the same definitions as everyone else while intentionally not making that clear just so that you can try to own people.

                Well if that’s the proper way to do things, I’m gonna need you all to stop obstinately refusing to use the words “man” and “woman” the same way as everyone else while intentionally not making that clear for whatever reason you have. It really IS rude to hijack already existing language to change the conventions everyone else is already using. I would also like people to stop acting like feminism is egalitarianism when the label is clearly gendered.

                If you wanna question what it is to be a man or a woman, then go for it, but have some definition ready before asserting what’s what in the face of thousands of years of precedent.

                • gap_betweenus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Dude what are you talking about? I can spend a lot of time describing what I do for work, or I can use a label that describes my occupation. It won’t 100% do the job, but will be sufficient most of the time, and if not I can elaborate. How do you even talk to people without using labels, are you happen to be Treebeard or something?

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          What makes us men any more than being beings with arbitrary shapes?

          Mango, why do you always have to be the one saying absolutely ridiculous shit?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      So why even use the word ‘trans’?

      Why use words at all? Just make grunting noises and hope other people get the gist.

    • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Can’t tell if you are trying to be forcefully post-gender or trans-exclusionary.

      Gender is arbitrary, being conceived in passing by ancient society noticing the difference in hardware without nuance, which was later used as a rhetorical tool for subjugating women and ‘deviants’ (those who didn’t fit neatly within the binary). Because of this subjugative function, it began being strictly enforced, and we still see that strictness in society today.

      Modern attempts at sorting gender have been a failure, consistently failing to actually cleanly sort men from women in a clean binary.

      Eventually there will come a time where trans can be omitted from conversation, but that is not now, due to the danger omitting it poses for trans individuals from unadjusted individuals. The strict gender binary must be dismantled first.