• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    They literally could just leave the feature on the device, but then you can’t force your users to send you all their data, voices, thoughts and first borns

    Fuck Amazon, fuck Bezos

  • jcs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If anyone remembers the Mycroft Mark II Voice Assistant Kickstarter and was disappointed when development challenges and patent trolls caused the company’s untimely demise, know that hope is not lost for a FOSS/OSHW voice assistant insulated from Big Tech…

    FAQ: OVOS, Neon, and the Future of the Mycroft Voice Assistant

    Disclaimer: I do not represent any of these organizations in any way; I just believe in their mission and wish them all the success in getting there by spreading the word.

  • Ronno@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Want to setup a more privacy friendly solution?

    Have a look at Home Assistant! It’s a great open source smart home platform that recently released a local (so not processing requests in the cloud) voice assistant. It’s pretty neat!

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have one big frustration with that: Your voice input has to be understood PERFECTLY by TTS.

      If you have a “To Do” list, and speak “Add cooking to my To Do list”, it will do it! But if the TTS system understood:

      • Todo
      • To-do
      • to do
      • ToDo
      • To-Do

      The system will say it couldn’t find that list. Same for the names of your lights, asking for the time,… and you have very little control over this.

      HA Voice Assistant either needs to find a PERFECT match, or you need to be running a full-blown LLM as the backend, which honestly works even worse in many ways.

      They recently added the option to use LLM as fallback only, but for most people’s hardware, that means that a big chunk of requests take a suuuuuuuper long time to get a response.

      I do not understand why there’s no option to just use the most similar command upon an imperfect matching, through something like the Levenshtein Distance.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve seen something about this pop up occasionally on my feed, but it’s usually a conversation I’m nowhere close to understanding lol

      Could you recommend any resources for a complete noob?

  • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you traveled back in time and told J. Edgar Hoover that in the future, the American public voluntarily wire-tapped themselves, he would cream his frilly pink panties.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I didn’t even know this was a feature. My understanding has always been that Echo devices work as follows.

    1. Store a constant small buffer of the past few seconds of audio
    2. Locally listen for the wake word (typically “Alexa”) using onboard hardware. (This is why you cannot use arbitrary wake words.)
    3. Upon hearing the wake word, send the buffer from step one along with any fresh audio to the cloud to process what was said.
    4. Act on what was said. (Turn lights on or off, play Spotify, etc.)

    Unless they made some that were able to do step 3 locally entirely I don’t see this as a big deal. They still have to do step 4 remotely.

    Also, while they may be “always recording” they don’t transmit everything. It’s only so if you say “Alexaturnthelightsoff” really fast it has a better chance of getting the full sentence.

    I’m not trying to defend Amazon, and I don’t necessarily think this is great news or anything, but it doesn’t seem like too too big of a deal unless they made a lot of devices that could parse all speech locally and I didn’t know.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    No way! The microphones you put all over your house are listening to you? What a shocker!
    If you bought these this is on you. Trash them now.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Maybe I misread the actual text, but it sounds like the exact opposite, that it’s going to auto-delete what you say.

    • Cokes@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      They delete the recording from your device…after it has been sent to Amazon to be stored and used limitless.

  • impudentmortal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How disheartening. I knew going in that there would be privacy issues but I figured for the service it was fine. I also figure my phone is always listening anyway.

    As someone with limited mobility, my echo has been really nice to control my smart devices like lights and TV with just my voice.

    Are there good alternatives or should I just accept things as they are?

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There aren’t any immediate drop in replacements that won’t require some work, but there is Home Assistant Voice - It just requires that you also have a Home Assistant server setup, which is the more labor intensive part. It’s not hard, just a lot to learn.

  • PeterisBacon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have always told people to avoid Amazon.

    They have doorbells to watch who comes to your house and when.

    Indoor and outdoor security cameras to monitor when you go outside, for how long, and why.

    They acquired roomba, which not only maps out your house, but they have little cameras in them as well, another angle to monitor you through your house in more personal areas that indoor cameras might not see.

    They have the Alexa products meant to record you at all times for their own use and intent.

    Why do you think along with Amazon Prime subscriptions you get free cloud storage, free video streaming, free music? They are categorizing you in the most efficient and accurate way possible.

    Boycott anything Amazon touches

  • blackberry@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 hours ago

    be aware, everything you say around amazon, apple, alphabet, meta, and any other corporate trash products are being sold, trained on, and sent to your local alphabet agency. it’s been this way for a while, but this is a nice reminder to know when to speak and when to listen

  • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 hours ago

    People are saying don’t get an echo but this is the tip of an iceberg. My coworkers’ cell phones are eavesdropping. My neighbors doorbells record every time I leave the house. Almost every new vehicle mines us for data. We can avoid some of the problem but we cannot avoid it all. We need a bigger, more aggressive solution if we are going to have a solution at all.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So… if you own an inexpensive Alexa device, it just doesn’t have the horsepower to process your requests on-device. Your basic $35 device is just a microphone and a wifi streamer (ok, it also handles buttons and fun LED light effects). The Alexa device SDK can run on a $5 ESP-32. That’s how little it needs to work on-site.

    Everything you say is getting sent to the cloud where it is NLP processed, parsed, then turned into command intents and matched against the devices and services you’ve installed. It does a match against the phrase ‘slots’ and returns results which are then turned into voice and played back on the speaker.

    With the new LLM-based Alexa+ services, it’s all on the cloud. Very little of the processing can happen on-device. If you want to use the service, don’t be surprised the voice commands end up on the cloud. In most cases, it already was.

    If you don’t like it, look into Home Assistant. But last I checked, to keep everything local and not too laggy, you’ll need a super beefy (expensive) local home server. Otherwise, it’s shipping your audio bits out to the cloud as well. There’s no free lunch.