You haven’t ever been doxxed period, and racists have harassed killed and doxxed even for minor shit, unless your definition of fascist is very liberal
Ah, so you’re very sneakily using inconsistent metrics to downplay the Nazis, counting every death that resulted from the policy of communists, but only counting direct and deliberate killings by Nazi Germany.
In other words, you are doing deliberate Nazi apologism.
By “wouldn’t take my source in good faith” you of course mean “wouldn’t unquestioningly accept it without reading it”. You’ll notice that my criticism of what you and your source are doing - deliberately using different metrics to give the data the appearance that it says what you want it to - is completely true and you can’t dispute it, so instead you’re just going to arbitrarily declare that it’s “bad faith” and “tankie” to make completely true criticisms of your deliberate dishonesty
And again, you are doing this as a way to downplay the evil of the Nazis, aka Nazi apologia.
You haven’t ever been doxxed period, and racists have harassed killed and doxxed even for minor shit, unless your definition of fascist is very liberal
Sure it was an attempted doxxing because they’re incompetent. I’m well aware of the evils on the internet and do a decent job remaining anonymous.
Tankies have killed as many people as the Nazis, actually more. Much more deaths attributed to tankies than racists could ever dream to commit.
Why are you defending tankies?
I’m not, and I dont care who killed more people, why are you defending racists?
I’m not, all I was saying is that tankies are worse than racists.
Edit: they’re equally as evil as Nazis IMO.
I too love to make unsourced claims that minimize the evil of the Nazis.
Knowledge is power, friend.
Ah, so you’re very sneakily using inconsistent metrics to downplay the Nazis, counting every death that resulted from the policy of communists, but only counting direct and deliberate killings by Nazi Germany.
In other words, you are doing deliberate Nazi apologism.
I knew before I even posted that link you’d try to explain it away, but I didn’t expect you to accuse me of Nazi apologia 🤣.
Have fun in your life friendo.
So you were well aware that your “source” didn’t hold up even before you posted it.
Though it’s unsurprising that a Nazi apologist would be deliberately disingenuous
No, I knew you wouldn’t take my source in good faith because you’re a tankie.
That Nazi angle is wild 🤣. Please quote me praising Nazis.
By “wouldn’t take my source in good faith” you of course mean “wouldn’t unquestioningly accept it without reading it”. You’ll notice that my criticism of what you and your source are doing - deliberately using different metrics to give the data the appearance that it says what you want it to - is completely true and you can’t dispute it, so instead you’re just going to arbitrarily declare that it’s “bad faith” and “tankie” to make completely true criticisms of your deliberate dishonesty
And again, you are doing this as a way to downplay the evil of the Nazis, aka Nazi apologia.