• UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Ok but 30% is still a lot. It’s not the completely comical number it was before but 30% increases on all imports from China is still gonna cause a lot of businesses to go under and prices to go up.

  • As expected, the previous China- US tarrif situation was unsustainable, both countries need each other in a way. Chinese exports to the US make up between 15-20% of total exports (GDP is misleading), and there is no replacing the US consumer market, other markets are already oversaturated with Chinese exports, and quite simply are not as wealthy as the US. The US needs Chinese exports to keep it’s economy running, they need consumers to keep buying stuff constantly to make the line go up, and China is the best source of these consumer goods, Chinese manufacturing can’t be replaced by any other country at this time.

    • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 hours ago

      there is no replacing the US consumer market, other markets are already oversaturated with Chinese exports, and quite simply are not as wealthy as the US

      This is not true. The tariff war is a prime opportunity for China to develop its own “internal circulation”, aka domestic consumer base (the CPC’s own terminology and stated goal) and to increase consumption/development in the global south. The US “consumer base” and “wealth” for imports is really just the American heavenly tribute that it extracts from the world. The US gets commodities on debt that it has no intention of ever paying back, while the rest of the world is forced to trade US debt with each other if they want to do business.

      The loosening of tariffs is a missed opportunity. The Chinese government could have continued to maintain pressure on the US. And while it’s true that this would have caused damage to export oriented businesses in China, China has a planned economy and certainly could print money to support these export oriented businesses. It could bouy its export industries by providing loans in Yuan to developing countries, so they can purchase Chinese products. The latter policy would pair well with China’s earlier decision to remove all tariffs on low-income countries (a much welcome move). Both China and the global south could then trade goods with each other using Yuan or alternative currencies.

      The only good part about this move is that it gives Chinese policy makers more time to consider consider their options and take things slowly. However, this time is fundamentally limited, as the American imperialists are becoming increasingly impatient and belligerent.

      • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        China has a planned economy

        they do to a far stronger degree then most modern nations but still fundamentally do market socialism. pushing the communism button would be irreversible one way trip and might be far too early to do that

      • SamotsvetyVIA [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The only good part about this move is that it gives Chinese policy makers more time to consider consider their options and take things slowly

        It is clear there is no consideration in China beyond “line go up” when it comes to their capitalism action plan. This is the fundamental issue that the USSR had to contend with in the 20s-40s, which ultimately planted the seed for fascism, reaction, and the eventual dissolution of the USSR.

        • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It is clear there is no consideration in China beyond “line go up” when it comes to their capitalism action plan.

          Certain factions in the CPC have this view, but there was an ideological struggle in the CPC a little bit before Xi became president precisely around this issue, and Xi’s victorious faction has made significant efforts in curbing liberalism. So this isn’t an accurate reading of the modern CPC.

          This is the fundamental issue that the USSR had to contend with in the 20s-40

          I think it’s kinda crazy to accuse the Stalin administration of being concerned solely with enacting some “capitalism action plan”. And while the USSR during this time was certainly very focused on increasing economic growth as rapidly as possible, this was absolutely necessary to ensure the survival of the Russian revolution (and the Russian people). The real seed of reaction was sown by Krushchev and the failure of the CPSU during that era of filling the loss of high quality and young party cadres in the aftermath of WW2.

  • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why did China put lower tariffs than the US? Seems like an L, doesn’t seem like they needed to do this, what is China even buying from the US?

  • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Bessent said the temporary reductions would effectively reduce the level of U.S. tariffs still in place on Chinese goods to about 30%, while China was reducing its levies on American imports to 10%.

    doggirl-tears

    Why couldn’t the US just destroy itself?! Don’t make the rational move! JDPON DON I believed in you!

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    And I’m sure Trump told everyone in his orbit to make just the right trades to take advantage of this - and when he brings the tariffs back he’ll give them a heads up so they can make some more trades before the rest of us know. Then he’ll do it all again.

    This whole administration is just an insider trading scheme.

  • dead [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The agreement statement only lists 3 actions, split into 3 paragraphs. Action 1 says that the US will suspend some of Trump’s executive order tariffs on China for 90 days. Action 2 says that China will suspend some tariffs on the US for 90 days. Action 3 says that China and US will set up a mechanism to have more discussions in the future.

    30% is pretty close to the number that Trump started with.

    The whole thing seems pretty pointless. Trump slowed shipping from China for over a month and the only thing accomplished is higher taxes on people who live in the US.