The entire idea that your “fuck you,” as a reaction towards that comrade was in any way justified was defining the boundary. You said what they said was, “too much.” By definition, for something to be too much, there has to be “enough,” and defining where that is, is defining the bounds between too much and enough, thus defining a boundary.
And you’ve done nothing to me for an apology to come this way.
Missed where I tried to define the boundaries of acceptable dialogue but okay, if I did that I’m sorry. If people wish death on me I get it.
The entire idea that your “fuck you,” as a reaction towards that comrade was in any way justified was defining the boundary. You said what they said was, “too much.” By definition, for something to be too much, there has to be “enough,” and defining where that is, is defining the bounds between too much and enough, thus defining a boundary.
And you’ve done nothing to me for an apology to come this way.
Okay enough I’m done here, hope we have better interactions elsewhere
Ciao.
:fidel-salute: for engaging so persistently and with principles, calling out the bullshit.