Image is sourced from this article depicting the 28th ASEAN Plus Three Summit, which took place at the same time as the 47th ASEAN Summit.


Last week concluded the 47th summit of ASEAN in Malaysia as well as a swathe of concurrent summits surrounding ASEAN. For those unfamiliar, formally, China is not a member of ASEAN, but is part of the ASEAN Plus Three (as part of the “Three”, alongside Japan and Occupied Southern Korea). And while not really ASEAN, there is also a yet wider organization, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which tacks on Australia and New Zealand to the group of countries that are currently in ASEAN (which is the single largest trade bloc on the planet). At the summit, Timor-Leste was officially introduced into ASEAN, making it the 11th country to do and the first since Cambodia in 1999.

Many important figures throughout Asia, as well as Trump, Ramaphosa, and Lula, attended the event. As you can imagine, Trump’s appearance was not exactly positive - signing four rather coerced bilateral deals there, including with Malaysia, which forced those countries to buy American goods in exchange for certain exemptions from Trump’s high tariff regime. The US is currently in a bit of a panic due to China restricting access to rare earths, a critical component of many weapons technologies (and electronics in general) and is looking around for countries to help supply them. After the summit, the US and China signed a deal related to tariffs and rare earths, but it seems very unlikely that this is the end of the saga; the US politically, economically, and militarily cannot tolerate China’s existence as a sovereign actor and will try to overcome them until the American Empire topples.

Meanwhile, China did as they ordinarily do, and urged higher regional integration and trade without high tariffs, as well as adherence to the Global Governance Initiative (which, as we here never tire of noting, is an interesting thing to try and encourage while the US only more feverishly violates the sovereignty of nations everywhere). One hopes they’re supplying a bit more than just speeches to Venezuela, Cuba, and beyond, as the US prepares to start bombing.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


    • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 days ago

      Trump’s attention flitting towards Nigeria isn’t a sign of some broader withdrawal from the Caribbean. The neocon eye of sauron has been pointed at Venezuela for more than a decade. It’s not going to stop over the whims of one man. Rubio’s personal actions are a much better proxy for how badly the neocons want to do a war in the western hemisphere.

      Air launched antiship missiles are fraught. I sincerely doubt Venezuela will shoot first, so their airframes are vulnerable to any opening salvo from the US. American ISR and F35s and formidable against Venezuelan fighters, regardless of how finite they are.

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 days ago

      Venezuela is a very hard target for military invasion on many levels. The US military, meanwhile, is a cowardly force that only wants easy pickings. If Venezuela keeps the US on their toes and makes them second guess serious action, the machine is going to turn its gaze elsewhere. But I don’t think Nigeria is going to be much easier, given its gargantuan population. There’s 8x as many Nigerians as Venezuelans and Africa is not easy terrain for large scale imperial operations.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        5 days ago

        There’s 8x as many Nigerians as Venezuelans and Africa is not easy terrain for large scale imperial operations.

        The key important issue is the revolutionary militancy of the people to bleed the invaders of their lands dry at all costs. The Venezuelan people are demonstrating their willingness to fight, I don’t know about thr Nigerian people on the other hand.

      • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If the US operate in Nigeria, I imagine it will be with Nigerian government support against ISIS and Al Qaeda offshoots like Boko Haram and JNIM respectively. All this talk about Nigeria started after JNIMs first attack on Nigerian soil a few days ago. It seems that JNIM has gone beyond threatening the AES states (Niger, Burkina Faso and Mali) and are starting offensive operations in other nations, they are going too far now. JNIM is also set to receive a $50 million ransom from the UAE for some hostages or something ridiculous. That would fund them for years.

    • companero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      5 days ago

      I do wonder if they drank too much of their own kool aid and thought they “need only kick in the door to collapse the whole rotten structure.” The successful mass mobilization and Russian weapon supplies may indeed have given them second thoughts. After everything that has happened over the past few years, I doubt the US can afford a whole new sustained war.

      It’s very possible that they will still try to kidnap or murder Maduro, though. He is one of the main things holding the revolution together, and the line of succession is questionable.

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s very possible that they will still try to kidnap or murder Maduro, though. He is one of the main things holding the revolution together, and the line of succession is questionable.

        I agree the US would absolutely attempt that, but I’m not at all confident Maduro is “holding the revolution together”. He’s an important and capable leader, but he’s used that leadership to ground the revolution deeply across Venezuelan society, especially with the huge project of commune building.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’m just going to copy/paraphrase my comment from the now locked previous megathread. All estimates based on publicly available information.

      Wouldn’t say so, Venezuela has had these Kh-31/AS-17 Krypton supersonic anti ship missiles ever since they bought the Su-30. You can find images of Venezuelan Su-30s equipped with Kh-31 from 10+ years ago. Russian military or Wagner technicians may have helped Venezuela restore these capabilities, but they have possessed them for some time.

      Their relatively short range of 40-60 nautical miles(nmi)/70-110km, and dependence on being air launched by Su-30s mean that it’s unlikely they’ll have any effect on a conflict. At most, Venezuela could score some lucky hits, similar to Argentina in the Falklands war. Though when Argentina did that, they were up against combat air patrols (CAPs) of Harriers. Venezuela is up against F-35B CAPs, a much better aircraft for air to air engagements, supersonic, stealth and already shown to be armed with AIM-120D AMRAAM air to air missiles, with a maximum range of 90-100nmi/160-180km. That’s not mentioning the anti aircraft and anti missile capabilities of AEGIS onboard the destroyers and cruisers. SM-6 missiles launched by AEGIS (anti aircraft and anti ship) have a maximum range in excess of 200nmi/370km.

      What Venezuela needs is a longer stick, and an ability to use it after conflict breaks out. The P-270 Moskit (Kh-41) and P-800 Oniks (Kh-61) supersonic anti ship missiles offer significantly more range and can be air launched or ground launched. Kh-41 is said to offer a maximum range between 135-160nmi/250-300km when air launched and flying on a combined high-lo trajectory. Export variants of the Oniks/Kh-61 offer similar maximum ranges and flight profiles. Modernised Russian versions of the Oniks/Kh-61 offer maximum ranges of 320-430nmi/600-800km. A ground launch or lo-lo flight profile will significantly reduce this theoretical maximum range. Though modifying the Su-30s to carry and launch them like Russia’s Su-33s can, or transporting missile batteries/ground launch infrastructure alongside the missiles for ground launch, would be a significant task. I don’t think the effort will be made, it’s quite unlikely. But it is theoretically possible. Ground launched modernised P-800 Oniks would be their best bet here realistically, gives them a long range option not dependent on aircraft. Hezbollah apparently had some export variants of this.

      Su-33/Su-27K with Kh-41 in between the engine intakes/nacelles, and Kh-61 on the weapons trolley:

      Person for scale with a Kh-61, massive missiles, an Su-33 can only carry one Kh-41 or Kh-61 on the centreline:

      For improved anti aircraft capabilities, the Su-30s Mech radars would need to be replaced by the Irbis-E, so they can fire the R-37M active radar guided air to air missiles. Currently they only have the active radar guided R-77 and semi active R-27. There’s no point in supplying R-37Ms without a radar replacement, they can fly much further than the Mech radar can see. Again, very unlikely.

    • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I do wonder if there’s any comparisons that can be made between Yemen and Venezuela, in terms of predicting how a conflict would go

      Because on paper, Yemen is very disadvantaged compared to the US (and indeed can only get missiles through to the US navy by depleting interceptors first) but in practice has been a monumental thorn in the US’s side when trying to reassert control over the Red Sea; merely bombing Yemen hasn’t seemed to achieve much either militarily or politically, and certainly not compared to the material costs in terms of manpower and drones and interceptor missiles and the constant expensive maintenance that bombing raids require (as we all know, money itself is no object to American imperialists, but the materials and time to manufacture the weapons certainly matters)

      Does Venezuela have any kind of comparable missile or mass drone production capable of engaging in gradual attrition against the US, or would such an attritional war only really arise if the US tries to put boots on the ground (or hires boots inside Venezuela) and then the socialist militias begin resistance operations? I’m assuming here that the Venezuelan air fleet would be taken out fairly quickly, and optimistically would “only” take out a ship or two before no longer being a threat (and indeed might not take out anything at all), which seems like a good assumption to me but I guess depends on what exactly Russia and China decide to do and send them.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        5 days ago

        A key difference is the Yemeni forces operate in a guerilla strategic mode of warfare whereas the Venezuelan forces is organized as conventional forces that operate with conventional strategic methods.

        So as long as the Venezuelan forces can maintain stand-off strategic offensive capabilities to keep u.s air force assets from being in range of penetrating into their air defense network, they can maintain full industrial capacity and continue to receive overseas aid. Nothing short of a sort of “deal” being made to let the u.s strike worthless Venezuelan assets for Trump to save face, to which would be a foolish move, there must be zero nautical water to give for the u.s navy to enter effective striking range of Venezuela. Or else I fully expect the invasion forces to strike first to open air paths into the country then utilize them to fully cripple Venezuela’s civilian, industrial, infrastructure, and military capabilities.

        Allowing Americans boots on the ground is the worst-case scenario. The Venezuelan military at all costs must keep u.s forces at sea and outside of their range.

    • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 days ago

      I sort of hope so for Venezuelans, and am not familiar enough with Nigeria to know what to think. The government there seems happy to accept help, but I’ve only seen western sources.

      But I think there’s a chance this is Trump’s last minute distraction before still attacking Venezuela. I’ll accept my punishment if proven wrong by time, but I’m not convinced he’d give up that fast. Or be allowed to give up I guess

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        not convinced he’d give up that fast

        I feel the same, and yet this is the same guy that we’ve all been mocking for years as being mercurial and easily distracted. I guess it’s more to do with the world’s largest oil reserves under Venezuela providing such a strong material incentive for capital and less to do with Trump himself.

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think there are probably very serious and intense debates among military brass and dipshit political leadership about if and how further escalation against Venezuela could be carried out. The US won’t bluff, but it can be deterred.